[Beta Testers] AI Writer - GPT-3 Based - Relevant Content

Interested

Would love to try it. Just read about gpt-3. Will probably try to generate niche articles.

Interested, been using copy ai and anyword. I need niche articles and blog posts.

I would be happy to test this new kid on the block!

I have the below AI writing tools that I use regularly for one thing or the other, so I probably know a little bit about how these tools are supposed to work.
ClosersCopy
LongShot
Peppertype
nichesss
WordHero
Frase

I have also used Jarvis for a while.

interested, please count me in, i have used Jarvis before and would love to try your AI writer

Interested.
For general website articles,
I've used copysmith before

I have Quillbot and am interested in seeing how this will stack up. Please count me in!

I want the tool, looking for my niche blog posts.

be interested - use Frase and lately peppertype - years ago used wordai
May not have 100 post but been a member since 2012...

Interested

interested but not qualified, following

Interested!
I am using jarvis ai for creating niche blog posts

Short update: some of the people who are already testing the app have reported some important bugs.
Big THANKS to all of you who helped us and who are participating in this program!!!

Last night we operated a large update on our app and on a few of our systems. The followings should be fixed:
- empty rows: the tool should not respond with empty rows and should also stop taking them into consideration even if the user adds them by mistake
- improved response time for text generated by Relevanto. The wait time for generating titles, intros, and related-topics should be considerably reduced
- eliminated the bug that sometimes prevented newly generated text to be displayed to the user (text coming from both Relevanto Engine and from the standard GPT modules)
- eliminated the bug that sometimes increased the response time of GPT-3 modules

Some of the testers have asked if we will add the Rephrase/ Expand/ Fact checking capabilities.
Our top priorities are relevancy and speed. But we're working on other features, too:
The Rephrase feature that most of our competitors are offering right now is based on GPT-3. While it works to OK, it's not great. We plan to offer this, too, but it will not be based on GPT. We plan to use a different AI model (not related to the Generative Pre-trained Transformer type) which should offer much better rewriting/ rephrasing capability (Quillbot level). But this will be available at a different stage in our project.
Expand feature will be part of our top module which will contain many other new features. We're working on it, so it's not yet available for testing.
Fact checking will be added, as well, but cannot confirm if this will happen before or after the end of the beta-testing phase.

To those that haven't received an invite yet: because the demand is quite high, we will probably go beyond the 50 users limit allocated for this beta-testing. So, don't worry, there is enough room for most of you.

Cognitive said:

Short update: some of the people who are already testing the app have reported some important bugs.
Big THANKS to all of you who helped us and who are participating in this program!!!

Last night we operated a large update on our app and on a few of our systems. The followings should be fixed:
- empty rows: the tool should not respond with empty rows and should also stop taking them into consideration even if the user adds them by mistake
- improved response time for text generated by Relevanto. The wait time for generating titles, intros, and related-topics should be considerably reduced
- eliminated the bug that sometimes prevented newly generated text to be displayed to the user (both from Relevanto and from the standard modules)
- eliminated the bug that sometimes increased the response time of GPT-3 modules

Some of the testers have asked if we will add the Rephrase/ Expand capabilities.
The Rephrase feature that most of our competitors are offering right now is based on GPT-3. While it works to OK, it's not great. We plan to offer this, too, but it will not be based on GPT. We plan to use a different AI model (not related to the Generative Pre-trained Transformer type) which should offer much better rewriting/ rephrasing capability (Quillbot level). But this will be available at a different stage in our project.
Expand feature will be part of our top module which will contain many other new features. We're working on it, so it's not yet available for testing.

To those that haven't received an invite yet: because the demand is quite high, we will probably go beyond the 50 users limit allocated for this beta-testing. So, don't worry, there is enough room for most of you.

Click to expand...

thanks for your updates. hope to continue to support.

think there's room to be part of your team?

@Cognitive

Is your tool able to tell the difference between correct and incorrect information?

For example, I have tested this in open.ai playground and in Jarvis.
But without success. The input is mostly wrong.

"Coffee is created mainly from bananas".

Me. Is this sentence above correct?

AI: Yes this is correct. Coffee is mainly made of bananas.


Example-2:

"Bill gates was the first president of the united states of America"
Me: Is this sentence above correct?
AI: A: No, it is not.
Me: What is the correct answer?
AI: The correct answer is: Bill Gates was the first president of the United States of America.

----End

This may be funny but I see a big problem in it. GPT-3 should be able to distinguish correct information from incorrect information.

I hope you will integrate some kind of fake news checker in your tool, I miss that in "Jarvis" "shortlyai" and so on.

I don’t classify for beta testing but I would like to purchase it when it becomes available. How can I be notified?

I am interested if you will need more testers. Thank you.

Interested in tool!

I am interested in beta-testing your tool. Currently writing with rytr.me getting decent output.

Most of the information is true, but it's not up-to-date. Meaning, it can't write about something else that wasn't included in the gpt-3 training data.

I believe rytr.me is your main competitor if their claims of having proprietary algorithms are true. It can write in my mother language without duplicates which for me is a big deal.

However, it wouldn't be able to write about my country recent issues, news and so on, which sometimes I am asked to write.

The work I'm in today requires using Jarvis. Really interested in testing your tool right away (If there is any slot still).