He still doesn't get it. Does he ? We are not looking to flow Page Rank. We are after rankings.
Whenever I see this guy's videos, I always feel like he has said the exact same thing in all his videos. Don't know if this is just me or anybody else noticed.
Your correct, but there a few interesting things he said in regards to panda and then with the exploration of going upstream in linking tears. It seems, the best way to be safe is to never link directly to your money site and always send generated links through a 301 redirect, so you can always turn of the positive/negative juice at any time.
More propaganda.
They really need to focus on having ONE domain per query. Having hundreds of ebay, zillow or whatever Fortune 500 websites in the results, is a bit much.
Yeah, there is no reason to be scared as long as you know what you are doing or not doing..."Shark 1", "Shark 2"
"Penguin 1", "Penguin 2"
Scary, I tremble horrified. :mmm:
I heard that his favorite place to hangout is BHW.
Code:http://barracudarecipes.com/cunt-bacon-sausage-and-spam.php
lol Soo Famous
Also, at the 3:12 mark, cutts mentions that google is going to analyze "going upstream" to find spammy links. To me, this sounds like they have found a way to take down clean Tier 1 links backed up by spammy 2nd and 3rd tiers.
Exactly, that's why he said also that they are willing to go deeper and deeper throught the links.
lol Soo Famous
It always amazes me that people watch videos by Cutts and think that google somehow is trying to help webmasters. There is a huge conflict of interest here. Google is now a very big, very serious advertising corporation. They have corporate targets they have to meet, and shareholders they are responsible to. Ads are their main source of revenue... basically their entire bottom line. Now please tell me again WTF would they send this clown out to directly instruct people on how to best rank websites and circumnavigate paying ads revenue. Basically taking money directly out of their own pockets. Now google is the biggest and best (well I don't know anymore) search engine out there, and without that they wouldn't have an ads revenue platform at all. So they have to deliver good and relevant search results to their users, but anything and everything Matt says regarding SPAM, rankings, what their new algos do and what they are targeting needs to be taken with a BIG pinch of salt. "Hey webmaster boys and girls, it's Monday's SEO Show with uncle Matty. Come sit on my lap while I tell you how you can directly avoid paying google money."
Paranoid... nah I don't think so. Google is not some evil empire. But its important to never lose sight of the fact that businesses seldom like to sabotage themselves. There's probably some useful info they release from time to time, but taking everything at face value is a little foolish IMO.
More propaganda.
They really need to focus on having ONE domain per query. Having hundreds of ebay, zillow or whatever Fortune 500 websites in the results, is a bit much.