Matt Cutts in new Webmaster Video

what to expect? disinformation from Matt and good rankings for my shitty spam sites.... oh and money in my bank account

^This is always the greatest irony to the updates: SERPs are immediately rendered an irreconcilable combination of full retard and ultra-authority sites dominating. The middle suffers most every time. By the time SERPs become quasi-rational again, Cutts goes and reinserts his penis into the Internet.



Then Danny Sullivan says nothing really happened.
 
^This is always the greatest irony to the updates: SERPs are immediately rendered an irreconcilable combination of full retard and ultra-authority sites dominating. The middle suffers most every time. By the time SERPs become quasi-rational again, Cutts goes and reinserts his penis into the Internet.



Then Danny Sullivan says nothing really happened.

Danny Sullivan is in love with Matt Cutts...but, hell I would be too if I could be that close to that guy...
 
Danny Sullivan is in love with Matt Cutts...but, hell I would be too if I could be that close to that guy...

Danny Sullivan is scared of Matt Cutts. He is scared that if he asks tough questions and doesn't blink and nod at the canned answers he does manage to illicit that Cutts won't talk to him anymore. Which, of course, means less high quality content on SEL *tounge-in-cheek*.
 
Some of my clients have struggled ranking even when they have big sites, lots of content and lots of links. We've now started creating microsites targeting specific verticals. Basic 5-10 page sites with a simple template and they rank higher than our sites and our competition, it is truly ridiculous that we have to take these steps to reach a position we rightful should be.

You will be aware of the reason why this happens.Large sites tend to use pages rather than domains for terms so there is less authority on the pages.The site may have authority in a few primary keywords where the homepage ranks.Pages are similar to web 2 sub pages although a subdomain in my eyes is stronger than a page.So your strategy is spot on by creating specific microsites.Indeed my own view is they convert better than a large sites page would anyway.
It's a pain,but most of it can be outsourced and it is effective and buffers the client site if you're using bh to rank these micro sites.In fact even when the update passes this strategy will work well because of the nature of it.
Google is a business,they want adwords prices higher,we counter that with skill and cunning,bh can adapt quicker than google can ever respond(in the forseeable future).There are always casualties in an update,that's life.However I have done what gorang has started doing for a while.Not only that I deliberately use specific strategies for lesser important microsites so when the update comes I can monitor results and quickly respond to the update within a day or so9though you'd leave it a week or 2 as the updates get tweaked for a while after they are live).I'd suggest you start getting domains and use different strategies in each in order to positively respond.

I wouldn't enter a niche without at least 2 sites in the same niche using different stategies.In gorangs case he has the page from the large site and the microsite(s) in the same niche.I would imagine the backlinking will not be too similar for both so there are 2 comparisons available to be made.

I wouldn't lose sleep over any update simply because you have no control over it,why waste nervous energy on something with which you have absolutely no control over.We are on one side of the fence they are on the other.The battle starts in the middle(the serps).Now when you consider the unlimited resources of google and the limited but highly effective resources we have(automation,imagination and intelligence) yet bh still prevails,if you get hit it's a change of tactics.

The advantage also is google cannot actually carry out as a blackhat destructive update as they like,because everyone is at it.Links we use are used by real people and businesses,yes certain networks,blog networks etc can get hit but does that truly suprise you that publically advertised services will get hit,I hope not,by all means use them for hit and runs.You can bet when the update comes google webmasters forum will be maxed out by whitehatters,the difference is a blackhat might winge,but they ought to also be right in amongst it testing new shit out and fast,the early bird catches the worm.

I wish you all the best when it eventually comes but if the results aren't positive for you,get going with a new strategy.
 
p.s. Matt Cutts is just a nerd doing his job. He's intelligent. A lot more productive than most of you. Quit it with all the Matt Cunts stuff, when he mentioned black hat forums you could hear the disdain in his voice. We aren't going to G to get rid of their webspam team. So stop getting emotional and research, learn, and adapt.
Hahahaha, damn! you just insulted a lot of blackhatters dude... :D
 
To this and a few posters above stating that google is creating a better and safer web by being a great search engine and trying to show the most relevant results..... have you seen how the SERP real-estate is dominated by google ads, shopping, and other owned and sponsored properties? Are those really the most relevant results? Also please explain to me why exactly a well SEOed site where the webmaster/seo has taken the time to build a solid site, and has gone through the painstaking process of building loads of links from all across the web, using anchors, contextual linking... blog posts, social signals, etc etc etc. Even if it is using so called "blackhat tactics" where links are build by automation... Why The F should that site not rank and be under threat of penalty?

Panda I understand. Content needs to be good and legit. Valuable information offered to the searcher... absolutely. But how is it that good hardworking people (marketers/SEO's/bloggers/whatever) who build up a site, or even small mom and pop shops who take their business online..... decide to get into this thing called SEO, have some links built because they are trying to succeed online... how is it a good thing for the web, or creating a better search engine to penalize them right out of the SERPS, many times destroying livelyhoods, months of hard work, and hope of succeeding. Then what, they have to go on their hands and knees and send re-consideration requests? Use the disavow tool to give google more fodder? ...... yep, if that's building and maintaining a better search engine, maybe I have missed the point.

And those championing Matt Cutts, if he's in any way shape or form responsible for Penguin and thereby the direct creation of Negative SEO which is now a very real and disgusting part of online marketing and SEO.... so much to the point that clients are contacting me to destroy ranking of their competitors (which I will never do and shame on anybody who uses these tactics) .... if this is his idea of a better search engine and a better internet, then he's a freaking douche and you can thank him the next time somebody neg SEO's your site and all your hard work and $$$ go down the toilet.

Best post on this thread +Rep
 
Back
Top