DISCLOSURE: I tested this app when its public beta was opened here:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/beta-testers-ai-writer-gpt-3-based-relevant-content.1356861/ . I also used Jarvis for a couple of months and right now I’m on a paid subscription with Rytr.
Sensit looks like a combination of both Jarvis and Rytr. The long-form editor module in Sensit comes with the best features I personally liked in Jarvis (3500 characters look-back so the long-form content will stay on-topic and consistent; titles recommendations, introductions recommendations, rewrite, summarize etc). The content I managed to get with the long-form module is on par with the one I used to get from Jarvis and the time I needed to build a 1k words article was about the same: 25-30 minutes after I have made my complete research on my given topic. There’s no surprise here, I think both (or all these apps) use the same AI engines. From my understanding, the main differences are in the way they are tweaking/ fine-tuning them. And in the price, of course
The blog outlines module in Sensit works just like the one in Rytr. If you are familiar with the latter you will find it very easy to work with; if not I would recommend checking their video tutorial. The quality feels a bit better with Sensit blog outlines because Rytr tends to build generic outlines (a comprehensive guide, complete guide, best method, best practices, how to etc) and repeats them in most of the articles while Sensit provides some outlines that feel more relevant and adapted to your topic.
Example: I gave Sensit the following main topic: how to install wordpress and it created a list of step-by-step instructions, based on which I could easily build new paragraphs with its continuation feature. No other nonsenses.
You can check the differences in the below mentioned screen-shots:
Sensit:
Rytr:
However, all of these AI content tools need sometimes several rounds of content generations to give you such a decent output.
Regarding the rest of the modules (ads, product descriptions & bullets, video content and description, frameworks etc): I haven’t really tested them much but, again, they felt relevant during my limited tests. The Video Chapters module looks very interesting, I think I didn’t see it in the other platforms I’ve used. Anyway, I’m not involved in the Youtube/ video content industry (yet) but if I’ll get into it (soon, hopefully) I think this module has a lot of potential in building the video script and content.
During this beta the whole app changed a lot and its current form is way different compared to what it looked like in the beginning; the devs behind it took into consideration a lot of the feedback they received.
And a few things I think this app is missing: a fact checking feature, tone of voices (I don’t really use them but I think they would be a nice touch), more languages (only English is supported now), expand & shorten (they do have the rewrite & summarize functions but it’s not the same thing). The speed of the app: sometimes generates new content very fast, but sometimes is a few seconds slower than its competitors.
Price-wise, this tool looks like the best bang for the buck, especially with this early adopter price.
So, OP
I want 20% LIFETIME DISCOUNT coupon
This sales thread has been permanently closed!
Click here to find active and tested Content / Copywriting services! 
