I still use Ahrefs, but i trust Search Console more once a page starts ranking.
That's pretty much where I am too. Ahrefs is good for the opportunity, but once Google starts showing a page impressions, GSC feels like the more interesting dataset because you’re seeing the actual queries Google is associating with the page.
I'm still trying to figure out when you make that switch. Do you use Ahrefs to select the first topic and then leave it to GSC once the page begins to receive some impressions? Or do you keep comparing both during the article’s life?
I’ve seen a lot of queries in GSC that are not the keywords I did the original research for so I’m curious if we’re missing a ton of content opportunities by making keyword tools the first place we look.
I agree, search volume alone is not enough anymore. A keyword with less volume but growing demand can be a better opportunity. Tools are good, but real user data matters more.
Precisely. I think the hard part is realizing demand is growing before everyone else starts chasing it.
Google trends can show the direction but I don’t think it’s always enough by itself. Sometimes a topic looks like it’s taking off, but there’s just not a lot of meaningful search intent behind it yet.
I’m interested in how you validate those opportunities.” Do you start with Trends and then look at SERPs, GSC, Reddit/forums or something else to verify before you create the content?
And, if you find a low-volume keyword that is obviously growing, do you publish early and allow the page to mature, or wait until the search demand is more established?
Compare the tool’s estimate with the impressions and query variations accumulated by older pages in the same topic cluster. That gives you a site-specific correction factor instead of trusting the same volume number every competitor sees.
Interesting point of view. I think the "site-specific correction factor" makes more sense than treating a 5K search volume estimate as a universal number for every site.
I'm curious about how you actually put it into practice tho. Are you comparing the tool's estimated volume against total GSC impressions on the same query/topic cluster over a fixed period or more just looking at the ratio of related queries?
Also, do you apply that correction factor when deciding what to publish next, or mainly when estimating the potential of an existing page?
Because if the same topic is getting 2-3x more impressions than the 3rd party estimate for your site consistently, that could totally change how I’d prioritize the next batch of content.
Traditional keyword tools only show the past, so you need Google Trends for the future, GSC for what Google already trusts you for, and Ahrefs/Semrush last just to check the competition..
I like the workflow, especially having the competition check last instead of KD deciding what to publish.
But there’s one piece I’m curious about: does Google Trends actually tell us the future, or does it just tell us that something is already starting to happen?
There can be a pretty big gap between “search interest is rising” and “this is going to become a valuable topic for a blog.” One trend can surge and then vanish, while another subject can grow slowly over two years.
Do you think the rate of change in Trends is a cue to publish early, or would you still want some evidence from SERPs, Reddit/forums, social discussions etc before committing an article?
I'm beginning to believe the interesting workflow is Trends for direction > GSC for site relevance > SERP / user discussions for intent > Ahrefs / Semrush for competition.
I think the tools are still useful, but I wouldn't treat their volume as absolute. I usually look at Trends and actual SERPs too, then use GSC once the site has data.
Search volume alone can definitely be misleading.
Agreed. I think we've all learned by now that the search volume isn't an absolute metric, but I think we're in the camp to say that the opportunity is a much better indicator than the search volume.
A keyword with 20k searches may not be a good opportunity if the SERP is all branded queries, there's little opportunity to capture clicks because of the intent, or Google can answer the query right then and there.
A keyword with 500 searches, on the other hand, may be an opportunity if the intent is good. We're all saying "I don't optimize for search volume", but we all need to start answering for ourselves "how much opportunity is there in this serp".
So how do you judge that before publication? I know for me it's a combination of a SERP checklist, but also trusting your instincts based on experience. How do you do it?
Don't check KD check the serps and see if the serps answers the query
This is probably one of the most crucial aspects that I’ve changed. While KD highlights potential difficulties with the link profile, it says little about whether the SERP actually satisfies the query.
How far are you willing to go when researching keywords? Are you looking for easy competition or do you assess whether the SERP actually answers the query?
The reason I ask is that sometimes I encounter SERPs with strong domains but poor content or answers. This is more valuable to me than an easy keyword with a KD of 0 that Google already answers sufficiently.
In case of AI Overviews, would you also try to find out whether Google can answer the query directly?
Traditional kw research still works but I wouldn't rely on volume & KD alone, I usually check the serps & threads first then use gsc date & ahrefs semrush to confirm the opportunity & competition
That's very close to what I'm doing myself, but looking into discussions to actually validate topics before going after them
The thing with "threads first" I'm curious to understand is what are you finding in the discussions that SERPs aren't telling you
For example, are you using Reddit/forums to find questions Google isn't answering well enough, language that people are using, topics that have potential before they appear on the SERPs with reasonable volume?
If so, I think that's an incredibly powerful way to find topics rather than waiting for Ahrefs/Semrush to tell you there's enough volume
Have you found any topic via a Reddit/forum before that became a search opportunity?
There are several things to check when doing keyword research, but the most common one is What is your intent to reach the audience?
This will decide which keyword can really help you reach users. Because some seasonal keywords reach the audience soon during a particular period, but for the rest of the month, those keywords don't help to create any conversion for you. (Example: World Cup football final match, date of the World Cup final, etc.)
That's a good point, I think, and one that is probably really useful for distinguishing between keywords of different search intent. This is where, actually, I think the "search volume" can mislead most of all, because two queries can have a similar number of searches, but offer vastly different value depending on what you want to do next.
Your example with the World Cup final is particularly interesting, but, in my opinion, it is the wrong question. Perhaps, it would be more interesting to ask yourself whether the keyword has a short-term or a long-term intent.
Say, if you are to publish an article about the final game, it will attract a ton of traffic during the event and will plummet right after, while a piece about the best football boots for beginners will offer sustainable traffic for months and years to come. How do you differentiate between them before you publish?
Does keyword research help you in any way to distinguish a keyword with temporary intent from a keyword with durable intent, or does intent research based on the SERP analysis help you more in determining whether the short-tail keyword offers any commercial value at all?
I still use Ahrefs or Semrush, but mainly for competition and keyword ideas. I like to validate the topic with Trends and actual Google results before writing.
This is very similar to what most of the folks here are doing. For me, the interesting part is what comes between saying "this topic has promise" and writing the piece.
What would be your criteria to reject a topic based on your analysis of Trends and the SERP even when the keyword has fair volume and low competition?
For me, things such as negative trend, weak click-through rate potential, lack of intent, or Google having the answer to the query already will be factors to think about.
Do you have some sort of check list in your mind or it is more based on your experience with the SERPs?
