Quick thoughts on traffic sources for forex offers

[DmitriyFX]

Been testing a few traffic sources for forex lately and the traffic behavior is very different across platforms.

1) Facebook: huge volume but quality feels weak. A lot of curiosity clicks, short sessions, and constant compliance issues. Feels like people scroll and click but don’t really intend to trade.
2) Google: much stronger intent. If someone searches trading-related keywords they already have interest, so deposit rates tend to be higher even if CPCs are expensive.
3) Native (Taboola etc.): depends heavily on the pre-lander. With a good educational bridge page it can scale, but raw traffic quality varies a lot.
4) MSN / Microsoft Ads: surprisingly solid. Smaller volume but the audience seems more serious - more desktop users and longer engagement. And payment value from MSN is really high, because MSN manage to reach very big whales

For me right now quality-wise it feels like:
MSN → Google & Native → Facebook

What do u think guys?

 

[wernerk93]

Been testing a few traffic sources for forex lately and the traffic behavior is very different across platforms.

1) Facebook: huge volume but quality feels weak. A lot of curiosity clicks, short sessions, and constant compliance issues. Feels like people scroll and click but don’t really intend to trade.
2) Google: much stronger intent. If someone searches trading-related keywords they already have interest, so deposit rates tend to be higher even if CPCs are expensive.
3) Native (Taboola etc.): depends heavily on the pre-lander. With a good educational bridge page it can scale, but raw traffic quality varies a lot.
4) MSN / Microsoft Ads: surprisingly solid. Smaller volume but the audience seems more serious - more desktop users and longer engagement. And payment value from MSN is really high, because MSN manage to reach very big whales

For me right now quality-wise it feels like:
MSN → Google & Native → Facebook

What do u think guys?

Pretty similar observations on my side. Facebook can bring huge volume for forex but the intent is usually weak unless the funnel is very well optimized.


Google still converts better because the user already has trading intent, even though CPCs are painful. Native can work too if the pre-lander educates the user properly.


MSN traffic is underrated in my opinion — lower volume but much higher-quality users. In finance niches that kind of traffic can outperform social pretty easily.

 

[Goddess Freyja]

For my opinion, much better if you use seo parasite method. (It easy to rank on google if you know how works parasite) you will gain more organic traffic. Since forex are highly CPC

 

[rikyzz13]

Been testing a few traffic sources for forex lately and the traffic behavior is very different across platforms.

1) Facebook: huge volume but quality feels weak. A lot of curiosity clicks, short sessions, and constant compliance issues. Feels like people scroll and click but don’t really intend to trade.
2) Google: much stronger intent. If someone searches trading-related keywords they already have interest, so deposit rates tend to be higher even if CPCs are expensive.
3) Native (Taboola etc.): depends heavily on the pre-lander. With a good educational bridge page it can scale, but raw traffic quality varies a lot.
4) MSN / Microsoft Ads: surprisingly solid. Smaller volume but the audience seems more serious - more desktop users and longer engagement. And payment value from MSN is really high, because MSN manage to reach very big whales

For me right now quality-wise it feels like:
MSN → Google & Native → Facebook

What do u think guys?

you´re sending the people to direct offer or for example AD -> Landing Page -> Telegram group -> Deposit ?

 

[gitobo]

FB pushes huge volume but it’s mostly curiosity clicks unless the funnel is super tight. google usually wins on intent because people are actively searching trading terms.

 

[darrenvr]

Been testing a few traffic sources for forex lately and the traffic behavior is very different across platforms.

1) Facebook: huge volume but quality feels weak. A lot of curiosity clicks, short sessions, and constant compliance issues. Feels like people scroll and click but don’t really intend to trade.
2) Google: much stronger intent. If someone searches trading-related keywords they already have interest, so deposit rates tend to be higher even if CPCs are expensive.
3) Native (Taboola etc.): depends heavily on the pre-lander. With a good educational bridge page it can scale, but raw traffic quality varies a lot.
4) MSN / Microsoft Ads: surprisingly solid. Smaller volume but the audience seems more serious - more desktop users and longer engagement. And payment value from MSN is really high, because MSN manage to reach very big whales

For me right now quality-wise it feels like:
MSN → Google & Native → Facebook

What do u think guys?

How are you running google search adds for forex is it with regulations via broker or are you finding a way to circumvent restrictions?

 

[DmitriyFX]

How are you running google search adds for forex is it with regulations via broker or are you finding a way to circumvent restrictions?

Of course just by finding the way to go around this restrictions and of course there are lots of nuances and blockings
So the process is not easy at all

 

[darrenvr]

Of course just by finding the way to go around this restrictions and of course there are lots of nuances and blockings
So the process is not easy at all

Im just thinking google search adds with those restrictions im struggling to see profitability at all(Im thinking white page with email redirect or telegram), as licensed competitors will make cpas crazy expensive. Any luck with MSN adds? I hear they may be easier to get through without huge hoops