Can I use bots to generate ads traffic ?

[ekuin0x]

I have this idea to code a bot that uses thousands of proxies and send traffic to my websites and click on links, is this method legit or will I get banned?

 

[Mactronn]

LOL! Dude, it's 2024...

 

[TheLoveofMoney]

I have this idea to code a bot that uses thousands of proxies and send traffic to my websites and click on links, is this method legit or will I get banned?

it will work if you use residential and static proxies.

 

[mrnixdorf]

I have this idea to code a bot that uses thousands of proxies and send traffic to my websites and click on links, is this method legit or will I get banned?

Don't know what you wanna achieve exactly, but you can only fool your websites with that traffic not 3rd parties like google
Proxies, fingerprints & cookies aren't the only thing that get detected nowadays.

Instead of focusing on building a bot for traffic, focus on a script that redirect real traffic to achieve your purpose
There's many place from where you can get that cheap traffic, "popup traffic" is one of them

 

[bonzo90]

it will most likely be detected as bot traffic if you plan on sending the traffic to any kind of network.

 

[Roxau]

No, this will definitely not work. Networks have some really good algos to detect this and you will be either not get paid or kicked off the network.

 

[satyr85]

it will work if you use residential and static proxies.

Nope, it wont wotk

 

[thedorf]

Ad networks have a big head start against your plan.

You won't get paid when nothing converts.

 

[ekuin0x]

@everyone , what if I use hundreds of proxies and make the navigation process random, like the bot will click the ad after a random number of seconds each time it's working (I'm using threads) , I believe that making the process so random can pass the bot detection test, specially if sometimes the bot won't even click an ad, it will just scroll the page and leave. any ideas?

 

[ekuin0x]

@everyone , what if I use hundreds of proxies and make the navigation process random, like the bot will click the ad after a random number of seconds each time it's working (I'm using threads) , I believe that making the process so random can pass the bot detection test, specially if sometimes the bot won't even click an ad, it will just scroll the page and leave. any ideas?

Instead of tagging everyone, I tagged someone with the username "everyone" XD

 

[Alpha1404]

I have this idea to code a bot that uses thousands of proxies and send traffic to my websites and click on links, is this method legit or will I get banned?

You will ban in ... 12 seconds.

 

[Ashk881]

@everyone , what if I use hundreds of proxies and make the navigation process random, like the bot will click the ad after a random number of seconds each time it's working (I'm using threads) , I believe that making the process so random can pass the bot detection test, specially if sometimes the bot won't even click an ad, it will just scroll the page and leave. any ideas?

There's basically no sophisticated bot detection tests on the client side. That's usually too resource expensive to run and hampers user experience.

So all ad networks will initially count your clicks as valid. But just before your payout, they will do some pretty advanced math stuff like Bayesian Filtering to figure out how many of yours were fake.

Basically, ad networks have fuckton of data about ads and conversion rates. They know exactly what percent of ads convert in a certain niche, how long users stay on a page, whats the average "impression to conversion" ratio for a certain niche and several other metrics.

So they run math to compare yours with theirs, and if it's inflated their anomaly detection code figures it out. It works almost 99% times.

Your artificially inflated conversion rate won't line up exactly with their data ever.

Basically, you can't cheat anymore.

The amount of time and energy you are going to invest into commiting ad fraud, do that into getting legit views. Its far easier.

 

[TiagoS]

There's basically no sophisticated bot detection tests on the client side. That's usually too resource expensive to run and hampers user experience.

So all ad networks will initially count your clicks as valid. But just before your payout, they will do some pretty advanced math stuff like Bayesian Filtering to figure out how many of yours were fake.

Basically, ad networks have fuckton of data about ads and conversion rates. They know exactly what percent of ads convert in a certain niche, how long users stay on a page, whats the average "impression to conversion" ratio for a certain niche and several other metrics.

So they run math to compare yours with theirs, and if it's inflated their anomaly detection code figures it out. It works almost 99% times.

Your artificially inflated conversion rate won't line up exactly with their data ever.

Basically, you can't cheat anymore.

The amount of time and energy you are going to invest into commiting ad fraud, do that into getting legit views. Its far easier.

This! Also, I don’t think they will even count the traffic as valid, as almost all residential proxies are flagged because people abuse them and is shared among many users.IPs are low quality, most come from botnets. Anti fraud tools have massive databases of bad IPs. I use IPQS for example on my websites to prevent fraud. It flags 95% of proxies. Unless you are using a service like @mobilehop , but it’s $200 for a single proxy, so I doubt it. And yeah, ad networks have the data, you will get banned. Forget about it.

 

[roydan]

You will ban in ... 12 seconds.

In some networks it might take up to 5 minutes

 

[Winifreed]

LOL

 

[Kenzo Wong]

I don't think it will work...

 

[ekuin0x]

I Dreams about It every night, but only in Dreams iam Not banned

Lucky you, I'm banned in my dreams too.

 

[synciaguard]

you can generate web traffic by using bots. If they’re well programmed, and routed through random anonymous residential proxies, most analytics software will think they’re real visitors.
However, if your goal is to fool someone, for example, getting the bots to click on ads to inflate your website’s revenue, you’re breaking multiple laws and could face prison time (unlikely).
Virtually all bots can be detected.

 

[ekuin0x]

you can generate web traffic by using bots. If they’re well programmed, and routed through random anonymous residential proxies, most analytics software will think they’re real visitors.
However, if your goal is to fool someone, for example, getting the bots to click on ads to inflate your website’s revenue, you’re breaking multiple laws and could face prison time (unlikely).
Virtually all bots can be detected.

Thank you that was very informative.

 

[Lisans Ofisi]

I wouldn’t go down that path. Using bots, proxies, or fake traffic to inflate visits or clicks is generally considered fraudulent behavior. Most ad networks, analytics platforms, and hosting providers have systems to detect this, and if you’re caught, you can get your accounts suspended or permanently banned—and in some cases even face legal trouble.