Twistler
Power Member
- Aug 26, 2021
- 760
- 287
For as long as I remember, people have always said botting a YouTube channel or social media in general is bad.
It's rare for me to actually see people saying botting YouTube is effective
I even often see posts here on BHW about people worried that they ruined their channel from botting.
To a sense, I agree with a lot of these people saying botting is bad. The question is the intentions of the botting.
Is the botting to manipulate the already f**ked up YouTube algorithm, or is it to brag to people the following that you don't truly have.
What are your thoughts about botting intentions? Does it matter why the user is botting or is botting just for people who don't deserve to get a chance on the platform.
Now that I got that out of the way, time to answer the main question of this thread, is botting YouTube effective?
I think this depends on one thing. Are you trying to manipulate the algorithm, or are you trying to manipulate people?
I have had luck in both of these departments as I started my channel off botting and I was actually able to trick people into
thinking I had more of a following than I did which lead to some great partnerships that in the end helped grow my channel exponentially.
After my channel started getting the initial boost from the botting, I stopped botting for awhile until I felt that I needed more of a boost.
By this time I had roughly 5,000 subscribers (~3,000 organic). I started botting my videos for a month or so, and by the time I stopped,
I noticed my videos were now getting the same amount of views when I was not botting, than when I was botting. Meaning the botting worked!
If I never botted myself and had success, I would have agreed with everyone that botting is bad, but like I said, I have only had success from it.
I have managed to get 2 viral videos (not shorts) with one video having 7m views and the other one having 3m views. I have also had many other
semi-viral videos with 100-900k views. Not only that but while I was active on the channel, I was getting 10k-50k views a video, and a large portion
of those views were from the search bar meaning botting DID NOT ruin my channel and my videos were just as findable as a channel that did not bot.
I often see channels worrying about ruining their channel from botting, and of course your channel will be "ruined" if you have 10k subscribers with 5 views a video
but in the sense of the YouTube algorithm, I have had no issues with my botting ruining my SEO and my channel.
So in the end, I have had success with manipulating the algorithm and not ruining my channel.
I wonder if a lot of the people thinking their channel got ruined from botting maybe just never had their videos pushed into the algorithm like a most videos.
Even if you're botting, the chances of the algorithm picking up the video is unlikely hence making these people think their channel is ruined.
From your own experience, has your channel ever been "ruined" by botting it? If you do not have experience, let me know your thoughts on this.
It's rare for me to actually see people saying botting YouTube is effective
I even often see posts here on BHW about people worried that they ruined their channel from botting.
To a sense, I agree with a lot of these people saying botting is bad. The question is the intentions of the botting.
Is the botting to manipulate the already f**ked up YouTube algorithm, or is it to brag to people the following that you don't truly have.
What are your thoughts about botting intentions? Does it matter why the user is botting or is botting just for people who don't deserve to get a chance on the platform.
Now that I got that out of the way, time to answer the main question of this thread, is botting YouTube effective?
I think this depends on one thing. Are you trying to manipulate the algorithm, or are you trying to manipulate people?
I have had luck in both of these departments as I started my channel off botting and I was actually able to trick people into
thinking I had more of a following than I did which lead to some great partnerships that in the end helped grow my channel exponentially.
After my channel started getting the initial boost from the botting, I stopped botting for awhile until I felt that I needed more of a boost.
By this time I had roughly 5,000 subscribers (~3,000 organic). I started botting my videos for a month or so, and by the time I stopped,
I noticed my videos were now getting the same amount of views when I was not botting, than when I was botting. Meaning the botting worked!
If I never botted myself and had success, I would have agreed with everyone that botting is bad, but like I said, I have only had success from it.
I have managed to get 2 viral videos (not shorts) with one video having 7m views and the other one having 3m views. I have also had many other
semi-viral videos with 100-900k views. Not only that but while I was active on the channel, I was getting 10k-50k views a video, and a large portion
of those views were from the search bar meaning botting DID NOT ruin my channel and my videos were just as findable as a channel that did not bot.
I often see channels worrying about ruining their channel from botting, and of course your channel will be "ruined" if you have 10k subscribers with 5 views a video
but in the sense of the YouTube algorithm, I have had no issues with my botting ruining my SEO and my channel.
So in the end, I have had success with manipulating the algorithm and not ruining my channel.
I wonder if a lot of the people thinking their channel got ruined from botting maybe just never had their videos pushed into the algorithm like a most videos.
Even if you're botting, the chances of the algorithm picking up the video is unlikely hence making these people think their channel is ruined.
From your own experience, has your channel ever been "ruined" by botting it? If you do not have experience, let me know your thoughts on this.