GregFromMoonsy
Power Member
- Aug 12, 2018
- 598
- 261
@splishsplash
I had on mind all kind of fake gurus and their correlations, NOT YOU.
Just I hate this word, because it's completely useless in SEO.
I saw many times, for an example: "We analyzed xxxxxx number of sites and here is what we learned"
In this case if 50% of sites was hosted on black servers and 50% on silver, those fake gurus find the "correlation"
But, when you will do the real test on hundred OWN sites - you not will find any correlation
You will find the true about SEO, instead of millions possible stupid correlations.
Especially that Google using a lot of algorithms for ranking sites,
and about each you can learn from Google patents.
The only problem is, that very low number of people is able to understand heavy technical language and what is
really contained there. Where in many of those patents, is repeated that claimed solution is used to prevent "spamming" the search engines.
By knowing it, you can understand for an example how Google detecting paid links, PBNs and many many other things,
which you have no chance to discover by any kind of correlations of sites which failed (or not) - because of complex of those algorithms.
So, even your way of learning SEO is much better than many people around ( what I am appreciating )
but as I said - you have no chance to find the true reason if you don't know algorithms which are explained in mentioned patents.
Also, I have used "color of server" to underline, how stupid correlations can be.
And usually they are.
Only who getting profits from mentioned "correlations" - it's Google,
because year after year real SEO knowledge is destroyed with absolute amazing speed.
For this reason they never will tell that SEO is at least 10 times cheaper than PPC,
because it's their main source of income.
I hope, that I have explained everything enough clear this time.
Best regards,
Greg.
I had on mind all kind of fake gurus and their correlations, NOT YOU.
Just I hate this word, because it's completely useless in SEO.
I saw many times, for an example: "We analyzed xxxxxx number of sites and here is what we learned"
In this case if 50% of sites was hosted on black servers and 50% on silver, those fake gurus find the "correlation"
But, when you will do the real test on hundred OWN sites - you not will find any correlation
You will find the true about SEO, instead of millions possible stupid correlations.
Especially that Google using a lot of algorithms for ranking sites,
and about each you can learn from Google patents.
The only problem is, that very low number of people is able to understand heavy technical language and what is
really contained there. Where in many of those patents, is repeated that claimed solution is used to prevent "spamming" the search engines.
By knowing it, you can understand for an example how Google detecting paid links, PBNs and many many other things,
which you have no chance to discover by any kind of correlations of sites which failed (or not) - because of complex of those algorithms.
So, even your way of learning SEO is much better than many people around ( what I am appreciating )
but as I said - you have no chance to find the true reason if you don't know algorithms which are explained in mentioned patents.
Also, I have used "color of server" to underline, how stupid correlations can be.
And usually they are.
Only who getting profits from mentioned "correlations" - it's Google,
because year after year real SEO knowledge is destroyed with absolute amazing speed.
For this reason they never will tell that SEO is at least 10 times cheaper than PPC,
because it's their main source of income.
I hope, that I have explained everything enough clear this time.
Best regards,
Greg.
Last edited:
