kickthat
Power Member
- Sep 18, 2014
- 755
- 1,110
Um, you linked to this same thread![]()
They got merged.
Um, you linked to this same thread![]()
verification
ˌvɛrɪfɪˈkeɪʃ(ə)n/
noun
noun: verification; plural noun: verifications
[LIST=1]
[*]the process of establishing the truth, accuracy, or validity of something.
"the verification of official documents"
synonyms: confirmation, substantiation, corroboration, attestation, affirmation, validation, authentication, endorsement, accreditation, ratification, establishment, certification; More
[LIST]
[*]PHILOSOPHY
the establishment by empirical means of the validity of a proposition.
"the verification principle"
[*]the process of ensuring that procedures laid down in weapons limitation agreements are followed
[/LIST]
[/LIST]
fiction
ˈfɪkʃ(ə)n/
noun
noun: fiction; plural noun: fictions
[LIST=1]
[*]1.
literature in the form of prose, especially novels, that describes imaginary events and people.
synonyms: novels, stories, creative writing, imaginative writing, works of the imagination, prose literature, narration, story telling; More
antonyms: non-fiction
[*]2.
something that is invented or untrue.
"they were supposed to be keeping up the fiction that they were happily married"
synonyms: fabrication, invention, lies, fibs, concoction, untruth, falsehood, fantasy, fancy, illusion, sham, nonsense; More
antonyms: fact, truth
[LIST]
[*]a belief or statement which is false, but is often held to be true because it is expedient to do so.
"the notion of the country being a democracy is a polite fiction"
[/LIST]
[/LIST]
I like the analogyJust keep throwing shit against the wall and something will eventually stick. But try to improve your shit throwing technique in the meantime.![]()
Whether Web2.0's are expired or new one? If new one have you created backlinks to Web2.0's?Fantastic stuff man. I recently ranked a bunch of client domains just with web 2.0s and press releases. Web 2.0s are handmade with 300 words content each. IMO web 2.0s are the most cost effective form of backlinks.
Um, you linked to this same thread
I see this "expired domains don't work the way they used to" thing quite a bit lately, countered by people saying "they work as well as they always have". I'm wondering if this has to do with how people set up and treat their PBN sites. Like maybe, for example, if you just make a one page PBN site that doesn't topically match the original site or the linking sites, just 301 all backlinks to homepage, and post your moneysite link immediately, then you get crap results. (This is just my theory.)
@Nargil Can you provide any insight on how to best treat an expired domain? I know you've mentioned it's best to let the PBN site age for a couple of months before posting your link. What about all the backlinks to inner pages? I feel that simply "301-ing all 404's to homepage" is the approach most likely to lose juice.
What I've been doing on some of my PBN sites is restoring the inner page URLs, but using my own content that topically matches whatever the original site had there. The idea is that this way Google has less reason to consider the existing backlinks irrelevant and devalue them. I don't like the idea of restoring stuff from Wayback because I don't want copyright issues or duplicate content issues if the previous owner moved their content elsewhere.
I don't know if this is a good approach and it's too early to talk about results. Any comments would be highly appreciated.
do you think if I use 404 to 301 way then the domains are already marked? or all I have to do is just to change it to normal way and link juice will come back
They got merged.
You have pretty much the same approach as I do. I try to avoid the redirects unless the backlinks are all over the inner pages (massively). Recreating URLs with my own content or just leaving them as "content not found" is surely a better option. I also never recreate the content of the previous sites, as I believe that the perfect niche relevancy between PBN and money site is a must when it comes to content. I also believe people underestimate the power of the content when it comes to sheer size and of course, onsite SEO. 3 - 5 articles on your PBN will not cut it. Shitty full homepage articles won't cut it either. 1 OBL link to your money site as well. No interlinking? That's the least you can do for your PBN. There's dozens of really simple mistakes that people do here.
Why they do these mistakes... looking for quick results, lack of patience etc. And most of all, they are not treating their PBNs as assets. Scraped domains... alright, you can treat those however you want, but if you own expensive auction domains, then fuckin hell, at least try to treat them with a bit of respect and they will reward you for that.
However I admit that few of my clients had non existent results even with auction domains (RD200+, clean and all), where I simply could not determine the reason why they haven't moved a spot. The best we can do is to eliminate as many factors that prevent PBNs from working correctly. And rest... well, we have to hope for the best. Let's not be mistaken here, there's a huge damn chunk of luck involved with SEO. But the more you try, the bigger your chance of getting a nice ROI. Just keep throwing shit against the wall and something will eventually stick. But try to improve your shit throwing technique in the meantime.![]()
Thanks for your input, greatly appreciated.
I understand your main approach is to use the inner page URL, but put different content on it. So you might have a PBN site scrapbookingprincess.net and there's a bunch of existing links pointing to scrapbookingprincess.net/magical-scrapbooking-ideas-for-christmas-2014/ or something, then you just use that URL but upload an article titled "Benefits of Industrial Vacuum Cleaners" (since the target moneysite that you'll eventually link to is about industrial vacuum cleaners). Is this more or less correct?
I'm kind of torn between making PBN content relevant to the existing backlinks and making it relevant to the target moneysite, that's why I'm asking.
.....There's no link reset. And please for sake of all that's dear to you, do not "work on your PBN authority" by blasting GSA/RankerX links there.
.....
Fantastic stuff man. I recently ranked a bunch of client domains just with web 2.0s and press releases. Web 2.0s are handmade with 300 words content each. IMO web 2.0s are the most cost effective form of backlinks.
Is this really true?
We have another one, just because link numbers will drop over time it does not mean that Google completely resets the backlink profile that they see. Stop posting this crap.for MOST dropped domains and leaving it at that state for a lengthy period before registering, the answer is "yes"...... if i had a website that is linking to a once live website/domain and I find out that it has ceased to be a live site it once was, then it just makes sense that I stop linking to that website...in this scenario Google has nothing to do with it. There are automated software that can detect dead links and services peope can hire that will remove such links.
That said and as a domainer since 1998, if you are contemplating buying aged domains that has some authority, then buy the ones that have expired or expiring, NOT the drop domains. There is a difference or A HUGE difference if you want to use these domains to build your own PBN, I will leave it up to you to do your own due diligence. RegisterCompass is a service that lets you browse through literally thousands of expiring domains, and can tell you the domain's age, backlinks and even sites are linking to each expiring domain eg edu, ,gov, CNN ( rare but a real gem if you find one)
We have another one, just because link numbers will drop over time it does not mean that Google completely resets the backlink profile that they see. Stop posting this crap.
.
I try not to comment on shit like this as I would most likely be seen as biased but when I see idiots posting shit about how "Google confirmed resetting backlink profiles of dropped domains" I start to get angry.
Not only are the peddlers of this crap affecting my business by posting unconfirmed and unlikely conjecture as truth but they are also misleading everyone else in our community.
It is one thing to post something as your opinion but as soon as you post that it is confirmed without any evidence or independent testing you are hoping that the one person that stated it (without proof themselves) in an obscure google hangout video about a year ago you are being wilfully misleading or simply lazy. You should not be posting things as truth unless you know it to be true.
SEO has not changed much this year at all, compared to the changes seen such as the original Panda and Penguin updates we have seen no changes this year.
Can we all just agree to stop asking what is working and continue making content and backlinks, that is what works and it won't change.