If you gonna get shared hosting then THCServer if EU (solid speeds in US)
I actually just got hosting from them yesterday ;):p:D Testing them out. I understand that VPS and Dedicated are the next steps in terms of upgrading the service but for now due to budget wise (and perhaps that is what i need at the moment) i will stick to shared hosting.
So besides THCServers...Got any positive experience in the past? (Take into account im mostly targeting US).
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIQ_LGL7cB8 ren a performance test for 30 days with 16 different hosting companies showing their results in page loading time and server response time as well as rating their benefits/features as well as their support, thought it was pretty informative...what you guys think?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIQ_LGL7cB8

I have to agree Siteground deserves that spot!
 
I actually just got hosting from them yesterday ;):p:D Testing them out. I understand that VPS and Dedicated are the next steps in terms of upgrading the service but for now due to budget wise (and perhaps that is what i need at the moment) i will stick to shared hosting.
So besides THCServers...Got any positive experience in the past? (Take into account im mostly targeting US).

You can always solve slower loading times in US with some sort of CDN (bunnycdn is cheap and works good local company) or get another server just for that location (its what I will do next).

Been customer of THCservers for about 2 years now ... all good :)
 
But why BlueHost did better on the test than Hostgator if they´re using the same datacenters?
Different machines in the same datacenter will have different loads. If he had bothered to use an external source to test the latency of the datacenter itself, the graphs would have been identical.
 
Back
Top