1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Google + - amazing. Facebook, Twitter will die??

Discussion in 'Social Networking Sites' started by m.rvs2141, Aug 6, 2011.

  1. m.rvs2141

    m.rvs2141 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    692
    Google + - amazing. Facebook, Twitter will die??
    A few days I spent researching Google Plus.
    A couple of big giants such as Face Twitter made conference with name, "How we shall defend ourselves against incredible big G?
    I'm not sure how they can actually resist the pressure from Google +.

    SOCIAL NETWORKS.
    Google + is similar to Facebook. The interface looks almost identical, with the classic three columns, as in Facebook. But the differences begin to appear immediately as soon as you start to invite friends

    In Facebook, you can not invite someone without making him add you as friends. Then he see your updates, and you his, most of us do not fully understund this problems on Facebook, because before Google + there was no alternative, and we saw no flaws, even though they were on the face.
    [​IMG]

    Instead of viewing all your friends, Google alow you to put them into different groups, called circles, such as "Friends," "family," "sex," etc. These circles as Google says: the powerful innovation. They allow you to send a personal "status" only for your closest friends, instead of forcing you to share with all of your friends (someone has thousand, someone has a hundred friends - but not for all you want to show a particular status .) In Facebook it is not possible. Google + allows you to block any information from your friends - you can read only information interested to you - the circles of "friends", "boobs", "work. Google +circle concept powerful and easy at the same time, the main differences between Google and Facebook that they have a differnt view of social networks.

    [​IMG]

    PRIVACY POLICY
    Each of us has an average hundreds of friends on Facebook. Add me! When you want share "status" on Facebook, you should share it with all of them! Is it realy stupid? This is the notorious problem of Facebook, the problem of separating different information.

    When people have to choice to share with all Facebook-"friends" information, or do not share most of us will choose the 1st option - and share.But at the same time tens of millions people do not want to give up their private lives, and they were forced to do this. They will keep their "status" with them without getting buzz from social networks.

    With Google + we get our privacy back. We can share updates with one person, if we like it. We can share it with any circle of friends whom we choose ourselves. We can even share with someone from another world (real world)) and allow it to index to the Internet, simply marked it as a "public." It's a good thing. Now we are ready to share more information as we can devide people - who need this information, and who dont.

    [​IMG]

    FOLOVING PEOPLE THAT NOTI IN YOUR FRIEND LIST

    One of the most powerful option in Google +, which is completely absent in Facebook - an opportunity to follow the updates of people who are not in your friends list (Facebook has "pages", but it is not the same). On Facebook you can see all update from person or no one!!! No alternative.
    In Google + you can follow anyone, and they do not have to approve you or folow you back. Twitter features allows us to see updates from people that we are interested in, such as celebrities, politicians, photographers, and so on. We can follow other people's tweets, even if they do not follow us.

    Twitter is in danger?
    Google has a model of Twitter "follow", "tweets", integrated into Google +. But Google +, seems to offer much more tweets, because now there are circles! With Google + you can tweet and share but 140 characters are now gone! You can share videos, images, etc.

    [​IMG]

    the discussion about your post can be greater than in Twitter - because it is more convenient. Google is - Twitter on steroids. Google allows you to send more information to your followers, and this allows them to discuss with you and with each other everything. Will Facebook have to follow the example of Google on this issue?

    Plus for Twitter is its simplicity. It is possible that the simplicity will win in the end? Coincidentally (or not!) Not so long time Twitter and Google canceled the agreement, Google paid a substantial sum to appear tweets real-time Google seatch result. Go ahead and add another minus for Twitter.

    SOCIAL FLOWS FILLED with junk - Say NO!
    Google solves the problems of privacy, since they also removed the news feed problems - unwanted information.

    Do you have hundreds friends on FAcebook, but your news is always filled with rubbish of 5 friends who seem ready to send the status every minute(i am eating, i am in toilet, i masturbate and etc) All friends are equall for facebook news.
    There are no simple way to updates received in your feed, sorting them by topic or by author (Facebook lists in most cases can do it, but thid function is not an integral part of the facebook platform, and Most users do not know about it or do not wont to use)

    [​IMG]

    With Google + above mentioned problems are solved. When people share something about the sport, they can share the news with their sporting friends, and other who dont care about sport protected from this garbage. Say goodbye to clutter feeds that we see on Facebook. Google + just did a news much better. Rejoice!

    PARTY ON GOOGLE +
    Google + offer too many new and innovative opportunities for social networking, to much to list them here. One impressive feature that can not be ignored, however, issomething called a Hang-outs, where you can invite one or more circle to join you in the room. The room is included text chat and video chat and it's really destructive feature.
    Party may also serve as a virtual cinema, where you and your friends can watch YouTube videos together as a group. Party added a whole new meaning of social networks. Facebook, is likely will try to reproduce this feature very soon, but with Skype. I think it will take them time to repeat the success of D +.

    [​IMG]

    Tools such as Skype, Gmail, Tinychat, and even the infamous Chatroullete offers text and video chat over the years. So why is Google such great party?
    The difference is obvious.

    Firstly, the implementation of technical and user interface perspective at the highest level.GOOGLE parties are easy to use, and they work fine. Second, and more importantly, it's the first time that the text and video chat and were joined directly to social networking on a large scale. Chatting with a group of people is a social activity. By combining these activities with a social network Google introduces all the attributes of socialization, we expect, as well as people.
    In addition, PARTYS allows users to create and delete Party on its own terms, avoiding the inconvenience of having to ask someone directly at the entrance to the chat to go fuckin out from his party or chat)).

    [​IMG]

    In addition to these attributes, ↑, parties offer a feature that currently has no analogues in the digital universe: the ability to communicate with interesting people, such as a celebrity or a scientist, and you do not need to be friends. It depends on each celebrity to decide how often and with whom they will initiate the crowd. Google Party offer us the opportunity to meet with friends, celebrities and people who are interesting for us no matter where we are physically in the world. It's pretty amazing!

    [​IMG]

    While Google does not have enough gaming features and third-party applications with 3D in comparison with Facebook, but offers many wonderful features which Facebook does not offer. To compete with new rival, Facebook will be forced to keep his game, and present innovations faster.

    Where are we going?

    Google + dont have quite a bit Facebook street magic. Google + currently does not offer a platform for third-party developers to create such amazing games like Farmville,widgets, FB-laundering, and other services for which we love Facebook. Google +does not have a digital currency, as Facebook (aka Feysbuka credits). Google + no advertising yet.

    However, the Google + has a secret weapon, iven for Facebook be difficult to deal with in long term.
    This secret weapon is all that what is belong to Google, and that is not associated with Google +. A formidable armada of Google products including Gmail, Picasa, Calendar, Docs, Maps, Search, News, Youtube, Chrome Web browser, Blogger, interpreter, Android, and so on are ready to help and join the Google + in the battle for the future of social networks. These products are the best in its class, it is very difficult to reproduce and is used by more than a billion people across the woeld. As those products are fully integrated with Google + we will see.

    In the stock market Google increase price up to 12% when Google + was launched.

    Google + really can take off Twitter or put it in some serious trouble, and hundreds more of our favorites in Silicon Valley get out of date ...
    launch of Google + fot Facebook is an alarm clock to create innovation to the platform.
    Facebook is a nimble company with a bunch of smart people, and they do not take this new threat lying down. But the threat is real, and it seems powerful. Facebook will have to try hard to outscore it.

    [​IMG]

    As for Google, Google + launch is a big step, especially for a company that has not been so fortunate in the social sphere.
    Google + attempt to make Google's products better than trying kick Facebook ass. Even if Google + can not compete with Facebook, it still big plus for the products of Google and its users. Thank you.​
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 23
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2011
  2. 3mountains

    3mountains Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    nice article
     
  3. Virus1

    Virus1 Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Occupation:
    destroyer of worlds...
    Location:
    Welcome to Black Hat World........................
    Home Page:
    Good article....

    I did not read it in depth... could not stand all the dumb pictures...
     
  4. m.rvs2141

    m.rvs2141 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    692
    Someone copy it from here and post to his blog. He get free article from me why he even did not press the thanks button?
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2011
  5. Solsupreme

    Solsupreme Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    2
    I disagree, Google+ is very boring, I don't know what all the hype is about, I don't think it is better than facebook
     
  6. Chris22

    Chris22 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    I think the problem with Google+ is the lack of user base.

    Facebooks current user base (I'd say) are mostly people who are in the 'habit' of using it, for many people using facebook has become the social norm. Although Google+ is good for the reasons you've stated, it just isn't worthwhile using because it doesn't have all the users yet.

    I signed up to G+ as quick as I could, because it looks great.. the problem is, out of my 400 or so fb friends, about 12 of them started using G+, which makes it sort of boring.
     
  7. m.rvs2141

    m.rvs2141 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    692
    For us google+ its another platrofrm to make some $, and great thing that its product of google, so staff we will share(public) will be indexed very fast and well i guess.
     
  8. core_philosophy

    core_philosophy Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Theres always 'buzz' around a new player in the scene. It will be at least a year before we know what their long term impact will be
     
  9. starbeezy

    starbeezy Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    I gave thanks for the effort put into writing this post and the time it took to edit them pics. Good stuff patna
     
  10. Deviant991

    Deviant991 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    7
    I think facebook will be around for quite a few years
     
  11. Joeblack99

    Joeblack99 Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    20
    Thanks is for the vids! Don't agree with your post -- well, I do agree but not the conclusion. You're thinking logically, but people are not that rational. Everyone's gonna stay as they are i believe, other opinions anyone?
     
  12. m.rvs2141

    m.rvs2141 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    692
    I am agry with your point, even i think that google+ is better, but people use to be on facebook and they will no jump for google+ imeditly . But this will bring us lot of updates on both servise, and mb some fresh methods to make $.
     
  13. Kameeleon

    Kameeleon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    14
    agree. more competition means more options for us. If G would have monopoly on web, we would be screwed
     
  14. britcpa

    britcpa Power Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    1,384
    thanks for writing this - its the first time ive managed to read something about g+ that made any sense. dont know that id agree with your conclusions, but before reading your article i was unaware of the main differences between g+ and facebook.

    - ability to restrict who gets to read what on your 'subscriber' list
    - ability to reject the meaningless drivel of people whose subscriber list youre on
    - private chat rooms for groups

    i can certainly see the appeal of G+ compared to facebook a lot more now. cant stand facebook and i dont use it on a personal level because of its invasiveness, but g+ sounds like theyve got themselves a better formula going. perhaps thats part of the reason why facebook are going for an ipo sooner than later - raise capital before the threat of g+ to their dominance becomes too apparent.
     
  15. andytopspin

    andytopspin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    40
    Occupation:
    9-5
    Location:
    Sweden
    One should know that Google+ and it's privacy has been discussed indepth by people around the world. I read today that Google as a company is the first company to be placed on some organisations privacy list with the level "Hostile Privacy".
    Might wanna look that up further for confirmation. I read it in the news.

    Anyways, I think Google+ won't hit. People are too hooked on Facebook with all it's features. Although we saw myspace go from top to loss within a few years. Very possible that it will happen to Facebook too, but they'd have to really step into it in order to loose #1.
     
  16. Antikvar

    Antikvar Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2
    What about youtube?
    Twitter, facebook are temporary using ....
    but Google will not fall
     
  17. ADHD-Dude

    ADHD-Dude Power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    119
    Do you know why facebook got big? Because of people

    G+ is a big mash of features that you can use to share webpages StumbleUpon.
    All the other features are useless facebook can add them
     
  18. omg123

    omg123 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    World domination, it's still quite underated as a
    Location:
    In front of my computer.North by north west of thi
    i havent read this yest, but youve got some good videos on here, especially the zebra crossing + football commentator.
     
  19. highrider778

    highrider778 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    152
    anyone spamming google + yet? lol
     
  20. LoLzzz

    LoLzzz Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketer
    Home Page:
    Loved the gif's :))