Does ONLY-WORDPRESS-PBN-SCHEMA make google penalise/not rank you?

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Messages
169
Reaction score
41
Hey guys, I'm trying to set up a scheme for my website and all I have are websites built on an old CMS which is used in like %1 of all websites.

My problem is with whether google will detect and penalise/not rank me for it. I figured there is literally no chance anyone would have relevant experience so I figured an analogous situation which many people should have experience with:

Say I have built business directories to my business, web directories, image links and some web 2.0's. I'm going to be deriving most of my value from PBN's anyway, and the default way to go with them are wordpress websites. If I had no guest posts form different cms's etc and I only had wordpress websites to get links from, would google in this case detect the pattern and decide not to rank my website? Wordpress accounts for 45% of the websites, and it would be highly unlikely for anyone to get like 20 links from them and nothing else besides business directories.

Would you say this would be problematic or am I free to blast links on my old cms websites?
 
@tiiberius do you know anything about this? You are the best, thanks in advance
Hmm CMS was never an issue since I only stuck with popular ones. Or I just make simple HTML website myself. :)

If it's something super specific and easily to see similarities then it might be a major footprint.

Back in the day an acquaintance of mine got penalized for using very unpopular registrar. At least that's what he thought was the reason.

This seems similar because registrar is usually no problem, most of them are huge.
 
Hmm CMS was never an issue since I only stuck with popular ones. Or I just make simple HTML website myself. :)

If it's something super specific and easily to see similarities then it might be a major footprint.

Back in the day an acquaintance of mine got penalized for using very unpopular registrar. At least that's what he thought was the reason.

This seems similar because registrar is usually no problem, most of them are huge.

Penalization is not really the issue for me, I still have resources to 'make it happen' for a dentist website im working on. I also have an adult website and everyone in the niche has very unnatural link profiles yet none of them get penalised. Some smart guys figured out how to escape the penalty for non-business/serious websites via redirects, and I plan on doing just that if I get penalised at all.

My actual concern is with the algorithm. If I don't have that diverse of a backlink profile google may just not rank me that high, which is a common occurrence, and I wonder if this may be the case with cms's too. I have seen adult websites rank with pure wordpress links though, so I guess if something like that were to exist it'd apply for them too. I know things are different for adult websites but it's not like water flows upwards
 
My actual concern is with the algorithm. If I don't have that diverse of a backlink profile google may just not rank me that high, which is a common occurrence, and I wonder if this may be the case with cms's too. I have seen adult websites rank with pure wordpress links though, so I guess if something like that were to exist it'd apply for them too. I know things are different for adult websites but it's not like water flows upwards
I don't think CMS is a link diversification factor.

But if you are worried, just build some links from other sources.
 
Hey guys, I'm trying to set up a scheme for my website and all I have are websites built on an old CMS which is used in like %1 of all websites.
CMS is not a problem. I've got 100% html sites that do GREAT as backlink sources even.

I would only focus on creating great content on your site.
 
Back
Top