Create WEB2.0 Structures Yourself - A Simple Method
- Thread starter Scritty
- Start date
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Sorry to double post here. Looking to see what NukeX offers.
It needs to offer the ability to multi post to a web2.0 to be effective.
That's not a "tick box" feature - that's a solid "MUST HAVE"
Without it, web2.0 sites are a total waste of time.
Schedule all the fancy stuff you want, draw lovely diagrams of wordpress and wiki sites springing up all over the web...
Then cry into your coffee 6 weeks later when they are all deleted or de-indexed.
One post web2.0 are a complete waste of space. Also one's with default theme, no author bio etc - they have a footprint bigger than an elephant walking through shite on your kitchen table.
Without that feature properly updated, NukeX is a mish mash of nice sounding nuts and bolts - all of which could be obtained cheaper and better elsewhere.
Nuke X keyword tool - OK - most are suffering at the momenht as the currency of good keyword research is being bought up by aggregators and now sold on rather than being freely available. The google keyword tool which the free or bundled KW tools use as their backbone is a joke.
Article Submission - Very inferior to AMR and Edwin softs Article Demon in terms of usability and number of sites
Bookmarking - Vastly inferior to BMD
Video Submission - Tubemogul and others are just as good - but the better features (in built ads) do cost
RSS submission - Man this is piss poor in NukeX. RSS Submit and Fast Submit (which is sold on this forum for under $10) are quicker and serve far more sites
Pinping - "PINGING" - oh do fu%^ off. If you are RSSing and bookmarking your links what value is pining - oh alright Scrapebox then. I have a list of 70.000 sites (more than SB will take in one go - and all checked working) it'll do your blog commenting as well
Press Releases - Get PR bot or some crappy $10 tool from Warrior forums to do this. It's a tick box feature that adds little.
So - by my reckoning - get yourself a Clickbank account, but most of the above on your own affiliate code and for about $185 (after you get your cash back - try and buy with CC and paypal and get a mate to buy one for you and pay him back to get past CB's "sole user" checks) you'll have FAR BETTER tools than NukeX and never have to pay another penny.
Not "almost as good as"
But noticably a whole fecking lot better.
The thing that would make NukeX is multiple postings to WEB2.0's to give them some value and the faint chance of surviving post "farmer" and "panda".
Even than it would be harsh as $127 when Serpassist does it all on remore servers (so your PC is tied up all day posting - or you have to buy a second PC - or or you internet connection isn't constantly in use) and allows multiple posts to WEB2 and costs half as much - hell Serpassist even comes with free captcha solving.
Yeah you can host Nuke remotely then add that to the cost.
Man it simply is not value - and you risk wasting time as well as money setting it to make these pretty looking web2 diagrams that won't last 2 months before they are deleted cause they are single post spam closets and the site you post on are actively looking for these and shutting them down as quickly as they can - far more than they were say 6 weeks ago - and it ain't going to change. The big algo update HATES single post web2.0
Get your head around it - adapt and survive - it's not 2009 any more - or get wiped in a flood of tears.
Your choice
It needs to offer the ability to multi post to a web2.0 to be effective.
That's not a "tick box" feature - that's a solid "MUST HAVE"
Without it, web2.0 sites are a total waste of time.
Schedule all the fancy stuff you want, draw lovely diagrams of wordpress and wiki sites springing up all over the web...
Then cry into your coffee 6 weeks later when they are all deleted or de-indexed.
One post web2.0 are a complete waste of space. Also one's with default theme, no author bio etc - they have a footprint bigger than an elephant walking through shite on your kitchen table.
Without that feature properly updated, NukeX is a mish mash of nice sounding nuts and bolts - all of which could be obtained cheaper and better elsewhere.
Nuke X keyword tool - OK - most are suffering at the momenht as the currency of good keyword research is being bought up by aggregators and now sold on rather than being freely available. The google keyword tool which the free or bundled KW tools use as their backbone is a joke.
Article Submission - Very inferior to AMR and Edwin softs Article Demon in terms of usability and number of sites
Bookmarking - Vastly inferior to BMD
Video Submission - Tubemogul and others are just as good - but the better features (in built ads) do cost
RSS submission - Man this is piss poor in NukeX. RSS Submit and Fast Submit (which is sold on this forum for under $10) are quicker and serve far more sites
Pinping - "PINGING" - oh do fu%^ off. If you are RSSing and bookmarking your links what value is pining - oh alright Scrapebox then. I have a list of 70.000 sites (more than SB will take in one go - and all checked working) it'll do your blog commenting as well
Press Releases - Get PR bot or some crappy $10 tool from Warrior forums to do this. It's a tick box feature that adds little.
So - by my reckoning - get yourself a Clickbank account, but most of the above on your own affiliate code and for about $185 (after you get your cash back - try and buy with CC and paypal and get a mate to buy one for you and pay him back to get past CB's "sole user" checks) you'll have FAR BETTER tools than NukeX and never have to pay another penny.
Not "almost as good as"
But noticably a whole fecking lot better.
The thing that would make NukeX is multiple postings to WEB2.0's to give them some value and the faint chance of surviving post "farmer" and "panda".
Even than it would be harsh as $127 when Serpassist does it all on remore servers (so your PC is tied up all day posting - or you have to buy a second PC - or or you internet connection isn't constantly in use) and allows multiple posts to WEB2 and costs half as much - hell Serpassist even comes with free captcha solving.
Yeah you can host Nuke remotely then add that to the cost.
Man it simply is not value - and you risk wasting time as well as money setting it to make these pretty looking web2 diagrams that won't last 2 months before they are deleted cause they are single post spam closets and the site you post on are actively looking for these and shutting them down as quickly as they can - far more than they were say 6 weeks ago - and it ain't going to change. The big algo update HATES single post web2.0
Get your head around it - adapt and survive - it's not 2009 any more - or get wiped in a flood of tears.
Your choice
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
indexmysites dot com is about 1/3 built.
Got so much client stuff on for the next 2 weeks that I probably won't touch it for a while - May is most likely.
I sometimes get stuck for something to say - but it's such a quick process that I stop tryng - do something else that needs doing - and come back to it when I have inspiration.
Did 3 very heavily spun articles yesterday cause I was "in the groove" other days it's much tougher.
Scritty
Hey Scritty
Thanks for the speech-to-text tips.
re: NukeX
So you can't make multiple posts to the same account?
Also, can you submit different articles to different sites (eg. articles in one of your folders) or are you stuck with submitting a spun article in one submission.
Thanks!
Working my way through this part now. Just wondering what you use for the email accounts scritty? combination of gmail cpanel etc?
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Nuke has a very good scheduling feature - you can submit how and when you like (it's not something I would use - sites take weeks to publish then google takes days to index anyway - why add more variation to a system that's already hugely variable)
As for accounts for articles - I have to hold my hands up and say I don't know - I would hope it did - but maybe not.
They answered the multiple posts to web2 in the negative though - so maybe you can't. - And that's the killer here. For me that's 60% of the value (of what seems a decent enough piece of software otherwise) wiped out - just like the web2 sites it creates will be 6 weeks down the line.
I buy emails 100 at a time from this site. Used to get Gmail (then that became harder) now buy yahoo. I have a few from Cpanel from my sites - but mostly just 5 or 6 dollars for a hundred from here on BHW
Scritty
UnDerDoG81
Power Member
- Oct 29, 2009
- 557
- 87
nox.hitman
Newbie
- Mar 16, 2011
- 20
- 3
Thumbs UP!
Thanks
Thanks
chinmokuyuuki
Junior Member
- Feb 10, 2010
- 152
- 49
Scritty youve tickled my imagination regarding my backlink strategy. I will try your quality over quantity on my next project.
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Thanks all - Yeah Targethut is the place.
It's regularly updated.
WEB2.0s will take time to mature (think many weeks) a 10 post web2.0 site will be a real bonus though (whereas a 1-2 post web2 site will be ignored or deleted in short order)
Remember - you can use the same WEB2 site to promote different topics in the same basic genre.
So I have 12 gaming web2 sites. I do a niche on (for example) Star Wars the Old Republic that's coming out in the next few months.
I don't make a whole set of new WEB2.0 sites - I go back to my generic "gaming" web2.0's and add a new category/page/topic/module or whatever.
That way the value of the web2.0 GOES UP and I do less work for my good links.
Setting up 5 or 6 link rings in basic genres is a GREAT time saver. You might never need to set up any more - just pick whichever is in the basic theme and add new categories to it. It will grow and get more "authority" and you will get links that much quicker and they will be that much more powerful
If I was starting from scratch, setting up 5 or 6 generic web2.0 rings on different topics may well be the first thing I do.
A week well spent that will give you value for the rest of your IM career (and costs sweet feck all to do)
Last thing LINK TO YOUR WEB2.0's. They are pretty much bulletproof, link with everything you can find. Google aren't going to ban Youtube are they? (Or Wordpress.com etc) so hammer the bejabbers out of them. Forget your sandbox rules and hit them with every link you can find.
But only link with lovely clean friendly links to your main "money" site
6 uber powerful WEB2.0 link rings with say 30-40 sites in total will piss all over hundreds of crappy one post SENukeX rings - and you'll have the pleasure of knowing just how much money you saved in the process!
Scritty
It's regularly updated.
WEB2.0s will take time to mature (think many weeks) a 10 post web2.0 site will be a real bonus though (whereas a 1-2 post web2 site will be ignored or deleted in short order)
Remember - you can use the same WEB2 site to promote different topics in the same basic genre.
So I have 12 gaming web2 sites. I do a niche on (for example) Star Wars the Old Republic that's coming out in the next few months.
I don't make a whole set of new WEB2.0 sites - I go back to my generic "gaming" web2.0's and add a new category/page/topic/module or whatever.
That way the value of the web2.0 GOES UP and I do less work for my good links.
Setting up 5 or 6 link rings in basic genres is a GREAT time saver. You might never need to set up any more - just pick whichever is in the basic theme and add new categories to it. It will grow and get more "authority" and you will get links that much quicker and they will be that much more powerful
If I was starting from scratch, setting up 5 or 6 generic web2.0 rings on different topics may well be the first thing I do.
A week well spent that will give you value for the rest of your IM career (and costs sweet feck all to do)
Last thing LINK TO YOUR WEB2.0's. They are pretty much bulletproof, link with everything you can find. Google aren't going to ban Youtube are they? (Or Wordpress.com etc) so hammer the bejabbers out of them. Forget your sandbox rules and hit them with every link you can find.
But only link with lovely clean friendly links to your main "money" site
6 uber powerful WEB2.0 link rings with say 30-40 sites in total will piss all over hundreds of crappy one post SENukeX rings - and you'll have the pleasure of knowing just how much money you saved in the process!
Scritty
Scritty read through the thread on bookmarking demon thanks for sharing on that one.
I started bookmarking at the weekend for those of you following this system i certainly recommend buying a decaptcha service. I tried to do it the cheap route but its the best $20 i spent so far.
Thanks for the post above scritty, it kind of answers my question but just want to check.
I'm in the process of dumping article links to my web 2.0's pr 1 and less I saved the pr 2+ for my main site and web 2.0s.
Just wondered do you use the scheduler for these posts or just dump them on? from your comment of ignoring sandboxing to web2.0 i assume i can dump these articles on to the site.
I did the pr 2+ article run first and pinged and backlinked them first to make sure they were indexed before doing the <PR1 articles.
Another question on your last post.
I have 5 sites in the same niche targeting a different keyword each.
I can use a 6 generic web2.0s to promote these 5 sites by using cat and seperate posts. No problem makes sense.
I also have 4 other keywords for each of the 5 sites.
I think i'm right that I should create another group of web2.0s for the second site keyword? rather than adding to the current generic web 2.0 ring?
So assuming 5 sites each with 5 keywords, I would have 5 generic web 2.0 groups?
or is this overkill?
again thanks for the great share
I started bookmarking at the weekend for those of you following this system i certainly recommend buying a decaptcha service. I tried to do it the cheap route but its the best $20 i spent so far.
Thanks for the post above scritty, it kind of answers my question but just want to check.
I'm in the process of dumping article links to my web 2.0's pr 1 and less I saved the pr 2+ for my main site and web 2.0s.
Just wondered do you use the scheduler for these posts or just dump them on? from your comment of ignoring sandboxing to web2.0 i assume i can dump these articles on to the site.
I did the pr 2+ article run first and pinged and backlinked them first to make sure they were indexed before doing the <PR1 articles.
Another question on your last post.
I have 5 sites in the same niche targeting a different keyword each.
I can use a 6 generic web2.0s to promote these 5 sites by using cat and seperate posts. No problem makes sense.
I also have 4 other keywords for each of the 5 sites.
I think i'm right that I should create another group of web2.0s for the second site keyword? rather than adding to the current generic web 2.0 ring?
So assuming 5 sites each with 5 keywords, I would have 5 generic web 2.0 groups?
or is this overkill?
again thanks for the great share
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Quick answer is I don't schedule
I may be wrong (but I've never had any ill effects)
Sites take from "instant" to "weeks" to publish your stuff, and Google can take a similar amount of time to find it once published.
With that much variation already in the system - why bother adding more?
All I'll say on WEB2.0's is add value.
Too many links - and every single post having one or more self serving links might not be a good idea.
BUT having some good outbound likes to authority site in your niche adds creditibility - both to the user AND to the SE's
Think of well constructed - well maintained WEB2.0's as an investment that will pay you back many times over.
Every day - first thing "I'm going to write 5 posts for my WEB2.0s" that way each one gets some new content once every 2-3 weeks in my case.
I've got a Wordpress.com blog that get's almost 8000 uniques a day average (got over 20,000 a day for almost a fortnight in the run up to Xmas), and many more that get between 3000 and 5000.
Try getting that with some shitty spun one post blog.
Not saying it was quick. The quickest took many months - some have taken over 2 years to get to this position - some still only get 100 visitors a week despite having 25+ posts/videos.links.original content and all.
Bit with about 70 on the go, across so many different niches - I always have so pretty powerful sites to bang content on and get links from.
And though it took many many hours (days...weeks?) to build up - it cost me flat zero, and the amount of link credit I get far exceeds anything you will get from a thrown up "half cocked" SeNukeX blog
The trick is to think quick and write quick. A 200 word post is 30 seconds thinking thinking - 1 minute writing (speech to te)xt - 2-3 minutes adding piccies/links and pressing "post" in windows live writer. 5 minutes a post - 12-15 an hour without breaking a sweat.
If I've done 20+ full articles in a day - I've also done well over a hundred posts (all with links - photos and all that jazz).
Sit down and work like a machine - when your done have a brew and toddle off to the cinema to unwind. Treat IM like a 40 hour a week job - and get as fast/slick/smart at it as you can. Early on decide what you are good at and do mostly that - farm out what you are crap at or find workarounds.
Despite (or perhaps because) of my coding background I now HATE coding. I learn and use the basics of HTML and CSS (I did Cobal, Fortran 8086 Assembler and "C" many many years ago).But now I buy/learn a few packages - but then buy tools to do all that crap for me (or hire people)
Leaves me to write content, design sites in tools like artisteer,, do keyword research, keep learning everything new in IM (don't think the time you spend looking at tools and reading forum posts about IM is wasted - it isn't - it's one of the most valuable things you can do)
Scritty
I may be wrong (but I've never had any ill effects)
Sites take from "instant" to "weeks" to publish your stuff, and Google can take a similar amount of time to find it once published.
With that much variation already in the system - why bother adding more?
All I'll say on WEB2.0's is add value.
Too many links - and every single post having one or more self serving links might not be a good idea.
BUT having some good outbound likes to authority site in your niche adds creditibility - both to the user AND to the SE's
Think of well constructed - well maintained WEB2.0's as an investment that will pay you back many times over.
Every day - first thing "I'm going to write 5 posts for my WEB2.0s" that way each one gets some new content once every 2-3 weeks in my case.
I've got a Wordpress.com blog that get's almost 8000 uniques a day average (got over 20,000 a day for almost a fortnight in the run up to Xmas), and many more that get between 3000 and 5000.
Try getting that with some shitty spun one post blog.
Not saying it was quick. The quickest took many months - some have taken over 2 years to get to this position - some still only get 100 visitors a week despite having 25+ posts/videos.links.original content and all.
Bit with about 70 on the go, across so many different niches - I always have so pretty powerful sites to bang content on and get links from.
And though it took many many hours (days...weeks?) to build up - it cost me flat zero, and the amount of link credit I get far exceeds anything you will get from a thrown up "half cocked" SeNukeX blog
The trick is to think quick and write quick. A 200 word post is 30 seconds thinking thinking - 1 minute writing (speech to te)xt - 2-3 minutes adding piccies/links and pressing "post" in windows live writer. 5 minutes a post - 12-15 an hour without breaking a sweat.
If I've done 20+ full articles in a day - I've also done well over a hundred posts (all with links - photos and all that jazz).
Sit down and work like a machine - when your done have a brew and toddle off to the cinema to unwind. Treat IM like a 40 hour a week job - and get as fast/slick/smart at it as you can. Early on decide what you are good at and do mostly that - farm out what you are crap at or find workarounds.
Despite (or perhaps because) of my coding background I now HATE coding. I learn and use the basics of HTML and CSS (I did Cobal, Fortran 8086 Assembler and "C" many many years ago).But now I buy/learn a few packages - but then buy tools to do all that crap for me (or hire people)
Leaves me to write content, design sites in tools like artisteer,, do keyword research, keep learning everything new in IM (don't think the time you spend looking at tools and reading forum posts about IM is wasted - it isn't - it's one of the most valuable things you can do)
Scritty
oneder
Regular Member
- May 7, 2010
- 284
- 45
Hey Scritty, thanks so much for all the info on constructing hubs. A couple things I'm not clear on if you've got the time to clarify.
-When you post to your hubs do you just write content off the top of your head? It it factual info or just blog/diary style? Stuff I read related to niche topic? etc.
-Do you believe that these hubs still have weight and are worth the investment and time for someone starting out right now?
-Most important, are you making money with all this work?
-When you post to your hubs do you just write content off the top of your head? It it factual info or just blog/diary style? Stuff I read related to niche topic? etc.
-Do you believe that these hubs still have weight and are worth the investment and time for someone starting out right now?
-Most important, are you making money with all this work?
Excellent post Scritty. Quick newbie question.
You said:
Could you explain this process step by step? I have AMR and I've run some test articles through it (very powerful it seems) but what do I do after the articles are submitted?
Again, if you can outline the process I would be grateful.
Cheers!
You said:
Could you explain this process step by step? I have AMR and I've run some test articles through it (very powerful it seems) but what do I do after the articles are submitted?
Again, if you can outline the process I would be grateful.
Cheers!