Jaordas
Power Member
- Oct 28, 2019
- 770
- 1,879
Yes, running it at a slower scale would reduce this. However if you are trying to get the easiest ranks you do need to cast a net, because keyword difficulties, etc don't actually predict in my experience, the articles that are actually gonna rank the fastest. Website used to have less than 300 human articles, now it has 10 k, but its traffic is still not truly higher than its all time high with just human. That is just to show you how little of the 10k are actually ranking enough to bring in the traffic that doubled the site vs last month. On the other hand, is it worth it when user signals and reports might stunt the site?Yeah at that scale on your own its not possible to fact-check everything, you know what dude, its not too bad, you can run this at lower scale and fact check everything, editing and etc, it works well. I did this with one of my sites worked out very well, those articles even get comments on how helpful it was.
Yes, its true you can just improve the article, that is what I've been doing but I do wonder about the bigger effect of having so much "useless" content on the site as some people put it in emails. It is useless because it is shallow and in some I've read it really doesn't give any information, its just like a student writing for word count but not wanting to talk about the actual question. This doesn't mean all articles are like that, the more common a topic is, I find the AI is way more knowledgeable on what to write.I think this is super interesting, even if people email you, you can just improve the specific article and live on right?
I expected some articles wouldn't be good, but jeez, I didn't expect how mad some people would be over an article not being useful or having slightly bad takes on a topic.


