Well guys, nothing really new but I wanted to say something about what I think is the negatives of doing this sort of thing.
The dark side of AI blogging I guess.
Which no surprise, is the fact that at a giant scale, it is impossible to quality check your entire website. At least until someone fully figures that out, and if someone were to figure out how to even outsource
the quality checking for with AI then that is probably the end for us lol.
In the years I've been blogging I've never really put out "bad content " before.
Right now AI is decent but its not the best.
Since publishing 10 k articles I've gotten 6 angry emails from readers basically saying my content is shit.
This is on the part that the specific articles they have run into are on extremely niche parts of the topic that the AI had no idea what the heck it was saying.
6 doesn't seem like a lot for 10 k articles but I've never gotten such emails before so it is noticeable for me.
Ive noticed that many of the articles I've been emailed about don't even rank in the top 3 of the term, so it makes me wonder if people are using the report button on such articles? I find it hard to see how these people ran into these articles if they are on page 3 unless they used to rank higher but got knocked down either by user signals or whatever.
I also know many people wouldn't even bother to use the contact page, they would just report if content is bad etc.
So it then makes me wonder if in the long run, the bad articles will drag down the entire website?
I have updated ever article I've been emailed on (you would be surprised how passionate people are about the shit on your site when it deals with something they are an expert on).
Like jeez, all these emails start of with the person being like "no disrespect but"
and by the end they are like "please delete your shit article or update it"
Low key rudest emails I've ever gotten lmao, but I'm not gonna go into detail about the things said to me that were rude, you can imagine it.
One email was 1200 words of the "expert " (I looked the person up and they are real etc) ranting and debunking everything said in the AI article.
Which obviously doesn't feel that good to read but for the sake of updating the article and just running the website I read it.
One of the emailers has said (it is as if you wrote this with chat gpt). (I'm sure the dude knows and its throwing shade)
We are coming up on 1 month since the articles were posted, so in 1 month I've got 6 angry emails, (all 6 are actually from articles made in the second batch of low volume/ comp keywords, I'm guessing since those articles have the most mistakes since the information on such things is lower, so chat gpt has harder time writing for them).
This in some way might be a reason to take the AI content slower just to ensure you don't put out anything that will have people emailing you to curse you out for stupid writing you didn't even read or write.