MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter MartysW0RLD
- Start date
- Status
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
thanks for your order, pm'd you information.
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
thanks, you'll be getting your order soon.
RuthSam
BANNED
- Mar 19, 2010
- 3,804
- 1,014
Got my first order finished and report delivered. Everything has been done very professional. The Web 2.0's are indeed looking good, there is an Contact Us and About Us page, the text is great for SEO and links are placed within the text. Everything looks just as described.
I give this service 8/10 points. Will defiantly try it again when needed.
I give this service 8/10 points. Will defiantly try it again when needed.
thecornstarchy
Newbie
- Jun 27, 2016
- 8
- 0
I am in for a review!
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
Thank you for that great review RuthSam appreciate it
sample sent check pm
no review copies left sorry, place a small order if you'd like to test.
lightningblitz
Elite Member
- Nov 30, 2014
- 1,920
- 4,714
I ordered 5 Web 2.0s. The niche of the Web 2.0s were about SEO. This was a test to use for clients, and this is not a 'cheap' service, so I am going to be more critical than usual.
First thing I noticed were the defaults were changed. This is something I mention when reviewing Web 2.0s because most sellers DO NOT change defaults. But this was in the rare bunch that changed all defaults. So much so that default theme was changed on a wordpress blog and had some further customization.
Content the link was placed on looked good, read well. Not a standard 500 word article and was to the point. The niche was SEO and the five money link articles varied on SEO topics from Negative SEO to Local SEO. So the blogs were not all about a single topic. Each was about the niche and well researched.
The articles also mostly had a 'blogger' tone. For any writers out there you should know that you can have an informational piece and a 'blogger' piece. The blogger piece takes the first person perspective and reads like a real blog would. This tends to convert better for review sites but is harder to find a good writer for. This was important because it fit the blogs having a blogging theme and persona. Too often I get Web 2.0s which read like an informational piece. The negative to this approach is the Web 2.0 screams promotional and would not pass any review.
The sites where you could add a unique header had a unique header added.
Each blog had a 'persona' and profile picture. I touched upon this earlier, but this is a first as far as I have seen. I do not even see PBN sellers doing this. This is a nice touch and gives this service a lot more uses than a typical web 2.0. Do not just think of this as a link building tool. Think bigger. Branding, Review Web 2.0s, etc. I know not everyone does things like I do, but for local or real online businesses, I claim web 2.0s to put up reviews for my business or client. Having the web 2.0 with a unique persona gives you a lot of latitude to make this look real or legit. Rather than me hiring a free lancer or giving another seller a few dozen bullet points and request revisions, I can buy this service and only give a couple instructions (Which would be: "Please have content reviewing X product from the business, and use anchor text of XXX").
All posts had media included such as videos and images.
Each blog had contact and about us pages. The about us were typically short bios but were as described.
Of the five web 2.0s I received, one was a quora blog. I normally do not find sellers using quora for their Web 2.0s. It was nice to see it included in the list of five I received.
I ordered a bulk 5 package which did not include tier two links (At least in the order form) but the report I received included tier two links, which I assume were for indexing. Only a handful of higher quality social bookmarks. All in all good to see. I personally use Social Bookmarks as one of my primary indexing tools so seeing Web 2.0 sellers include these shows me they know what they are doing.
The only real negative (Which is not much of a negative) is one site used an image for a header, and that image was used in a post on one of the other web 2.0s. Using free to use images from google will not always give you a lot of options, and for SEO, you have a few niche relevant images which are free to use and fit for the articles. So I let this fly as I would not have done better myself. In fact, unless you were looking for this you would most likely not notice this or even consider it an issue. Aside from this, I say NO other cross using of images or videos.
If I could make a few suggestions it would be:
1. Drip content longer / schedule posting.
TAT was super quick. I sat on the report a few days. Some people like quick (I do), but for quality sake it may not be a bad thing.
2. Logo's.
Not applicable to all web 2.0s, but some do allow for a logo. This would be an added cost and may not be possible at the price point (It would not be) but may be a neat add on.
3. No cross - using images.
This is a sensitive topic to suggest for the simple reason the image was not replicated. It was modified and used as a header / logo for one site, and used for another in an article. Not a huge issue, but something to note.
I will be ordering again. Some of the best quality Web 2.0s I have seen and used some personal touches (Such as using a persona with a profile picture) I do not even do for my web 2.0s but see the value in. The rare situation where I find a seller who offers a better service than what I would do for myself.
For a number rating, 9 / 10. 10 would be slightly longer drip, a logo, and some more tier two. That would cost a LOT more than $9.99. For what you pay, you can't get much better.
First thing I noticed were the defaults were changed. This is something I mention when reviewing Web 2.0s because most sellers DO NOT change defaults. But this was in the rare bunch that changed all defaults. So much so that default theme was changed on a wordpress blog and had some further customization.
Content the link was placed on looked good, read well. Not a standard 500 word article and was to the point. The niche was SEO and the five money link articles varied on SEO topics from Negative SEO to Local SEO. So the blogs were not all about a single topic. Each was about the niche and well researched.
The articles also mostly had a 'blogger' tone. For any writers out there you should know that you can have an informational piece and a 'blogger' piece. The blogger piece takes the first person perspective and reads like a real blog would. This tends to convert better for review sites but is harder to find a good writer for. This was important because it fit the blogs having a blogging theme and persona. Too often I get Web 2.0s which read like an informational piece. The negative to this approach is the Web 2.0 screams promotional and would not pass any review.
The sites where you could add a unique header had a unique header added.
Each blog had a 'persona' and profile picture. I touched upon this earlier, but this is a first as far as I have seen. I do not even see PBN sellers doing this. This is a nice touch and gives this service a lot more uses than a typical web 2.0. Do not just think of this as a link building tool. Think bigger. Branding, Review Web 2.0s, etc. I know not everyone does things like I do, but for local or real online businesses, I claim web 2.0s to put up reviews for my business or client. Having the web 2.0 with a unique persona gives you a lot of latitude to make this look real or legit. Rather than me hiring a free lancer or giving another seller a few dozen bullet points and request revisions, I can buy this service and only give a couple instructions (Which would be: "Please have content reviewing X product from the business, and use anchor text of XXX").
All posts had media included such as videos and images.
Each blog had contact and about us pages. The about us were typically short bios but were as described.
Of the five web 2.0s I received, one was a quora blog. I normally do not find sellers using quora for their Web 2.0s. It was nice to see it included in the list of five I received.
I ordered a bulk 5 package which did not include tier two links (At least in the order form) but the report I received included tier two links, which I assume were for indexing. Only a handful of higher quality social bookmarks. All in all good to see. I personally use Social Bookmarks as one of my primary indexing tools so seeing Web 2.0 sellers include these shows me they know what they are doing.
The only real negative (Which is not much of a negative) is one site used an image for a header, and that image was used in a post on one of the other web 2.0s. Using free to use images from google will not always give you a lot of options, and for SEO, you have a few niche relevant images which are free to use and fit for the articles. So I let this fly as I would not have done better myself. In fact, unless you were looking for this you would most likely not notice this or even consider it an issue. Aside from this, I say NO other cross using of images or videos.
If I could make a few suggestions it would be:
1. Drip content longer / schedule posting.
TAT was super quick. I sat on the report a few days. Some people like quick (I do), but for quality sake it may not be a bad thing.
2. Logo's.
Not applicable to all web 2.0s, but some do allow for a logo. This would be an added cost and may not be possible at the price point (It would not be) but may be a neat add on.
3. No cross - using images.
This is a sensitive topic to suggest for the simple reason the image was not replicated. It was modified and used as a header / logo for one site, and used for another in an article. Not a huge issue, but something to note.
I will be ordering again. Some of the best quality Web 2.0s I have seen and used some personal touches (Such as using a persona with a profile picture) I do not even do for my web 2.0s but see the value in. The rare situation where I find a seller who offers a better service than what I would do for myself.
For a number rating, 9 / 10. 10 would be slightly longer drip, a logo, and some more tier two. That would cost a LOT more than $9.99. For what you pay, you can't get much better.
goldenkiid
Junior Member
- Jan 25, 2016
- 159
- 38
I have placed an order of 1 web 2.0
Last 8 digits of the transaction id number: 3887-1089
Last 8 digits of the transaction id number: 3887-1089
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
Awesome review lightningblitz, very informative I really appreciate it. Look forward to working with you in the future.
Thank you for your order, you will receive your 2.0 shortly.
anthonymcneil
Newbie
- Sep 22, 2015
- 40
- 2
Please drop some sample please i waiting.....
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
pm'd you
thanks for your order, you will get your link report shortly.
samples sent check pm
samples sent check pm
MartysW0RLD
Senior Member
- Apr 14, 2013
- 958
- 227
yes partially done, will be sent to you very soon.
ThopHayt
Elite Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 7,012
- 2,864
Review:
Quick TAT, got a multipage web2.0 with the following pages: Home, About, Contact, and 6 articles (one with my link). The article with my link was unique and clearly manually written and 231 words in length. The "Home" page is just the articles all listed out, and the About and Contact had just a sentence or two. The 5 non-link articles were solid and VERY relevant. He also used photos in all articles. While I would have preferred a longer article for my main post, for the price I feel this seller did a nice job though. Very good quality overall, and its clearly manually set up and written well overall. Not perfect, but if you need T1 web2.0's I can't think of a better option at the moment. Well done.
Quick TAT, got a multipage web2.0 with the following pages: Home, About, Contact, and 6 articles (one with my link). The article with my link was unique and clearly manually written and 231 words in length. The "Home" page is just the articles all listed out, and the About and Contact had just a sentence or two. The 5 non-link articles were solid and VERY relevant. He also used photos in all articles. While I would have preferred a longer article for my main post, for the price I feel this seller did a nice job though. Very good quality overall, and its clearly manually set up and written well overall. Not perfect, but if you need T1 web2.0's I can't think of a better option at the moment. Well done.
- Status