Using web 2.0 as tier 1 links?

[ciphercipher1]

Hey there I am getting started with GSA SER and I was wondering if i can use web 2.0 as tier 1 links and blast them? Also should the web 2.0 be always do-follow? Will it pass link juice if it is no-follow? Because i feel like google bots will crawl the links regardless of what rel they have. Thanks in advance!

 

[tazarbm]

you can use them, but they don't have ranking power, especially if they're nofollow.

Also should the web 2.0 be always do-follow?

no, but nofollow links don't pass link juice so you want them to be DF

Will it pass link juice if it is no-follow?

no... OK, they don't pass A LOT of it, let's put it this way before they jump at my throat

Because i feel like google bots will crawl the links regardless of what rel they have.

true

 

[ciphercipher1]

you can use them, but they don't have ranking power, especially if they're nofollow.


no, but nofollow links don't pass link juice so you want them to be DF


no... OK, they don't pass A LOT of it, let's put it this way before they jump at my throat


true

so brother will there be any effect on my website (i hope positive) , if for example i build blogger , wordpress , pinterest , wix , tumblr , medium and similar websites backlinks - and blast them with tier 2 and 3 gsa ser links? Assuming all of the "mini sites" or articles on those sites are done correctly with good content and not only to point to my website?
Thanks in advance!

 

[tazarbm]

so brother will there be any effect on my website (i hope positive) , if for example i build blogger , wordpress , pinterest , wix , tumblr , medium and similar websites backlinks - and blast them with tier 2 and 3 gsa ser links?

I don't know your niche, keywords and competition, so I can't answer this.

Just build them and see what happens, I can guarantee that nothing bad will happen if you mind the anchors and don't create 100s of backlinks at once to the same page. If you care about anchors, diversifying and link velocity I can guarantee that you'll be safe, but I can't guarantee positive results as I'm not google. And don't forget to index the links...

Also, be careful that some sites nofollow or remove your links behind your back, or they delete your content altogether. Some of the web 2.0s have become very sneaky

 

[hideath]

so brother will there be any effect on my website (i hope positive) , if for example i build blogger , wordpress , pinterest , wix , tumblr , medium and similar websites backlinks - and blast them with tier 2 and 3 gsa ser links? Assuming all of the "mini sites" or articles on those sites are done correctly with good content and not only to point to my website?
Thanks in advance!

You're referring to a web 2.0s PBN most likely,
This is safer approach in fact, but the results are really random,

I got some web 2.0s created with the exact same approach still ranking until today and some outranking the page linked to,
They were created a few years back in time, the content and design are within a good quality,
They got all the necessary legal and information pages and just a landing homepage with 300-2000 words in most of them,

Many others are completely vanished from the SERPs,
And plenty with little to no more effect on the Money site keywords,

It all depends on your approach, tier 2 link, niche, etc...
I'm testing a similar stuff currently, it would take some time, but i hope it would be useful for users for at least with the current SEO adaptations

 

[ciphercipher1]

I don't know your niche, keywords and competition, so I can't answer this.

Just build them and see what happens, I can guarantee that nothing bad will happen if you mind the anchors and don't create 100s of backlinks at once to the same page. If you care about anchors, diversifying and link velocity I can guarantee that you'll be safe, but I can't guarantee positive results as I'm not google. And don't forget to index the links...

Also, be careful that some sites nofollow or remove your links behind your back, or they delete your content altogether. Some of the web 2.0s have become very sneaky

thanks bro. the niches are non ymyl and i use ai content. lets put some stuff to the test and see.

You're referring to a web 2.0s PBN most likely,
This is safer approach in fact, but the results are really random,

I got some web 2.0s created with the exact same approach still ranking until today and some outranking the page linked to,
They were created a few years back in time, the content and design are within a good quality,
They got all the necessary legal and information pages and just a landing homepage with 300-2000 words in most of them,

Many others are completely vanished from the SERPs,
And plenty with little to no more effect on the Money site keywords,

It all depends on your approach, tier 2 link, niche, etc...
I'm testing a similar stuff currently, it would take some time, but i hope it would be useful for users for at least with the current SEO adaptations

as web 2.0 i mostly refer to social media and mini sites like wix blogger and similar. just repurposing my other content in other languages or maybe utilizing a spinner and linking back to my main site

 

[hideath]

as web 2.0 i mostly refer to social media and mini sites like wix blogger and similar. just repurposing my other content in other languages or maybe utilizing a spinner and linking back to my main site

you can use similar content, but not ideally,
you're creating the web 2.0s for the purpose of passing link juice mainly, you don't really want them to rank for your keywords,
you can use a related content/keyword that you're not targeting, niche related is better for sure,
use AI for the content, why bother with spintax while you can easily create unique content for free

 

[ryan-isra]

You're referring to a web 2.0s PBN most likely,
This is safer approach in fact, but the results are really random,

I got some web 2.0s created with the exact same approach still ranking until today and some outranking the page linked to,
They were created a few years back in time, the content and design are within a good quality,
They got all the necessary legal and information pages and just a landing homepage with 300-2000 words in most of them,

Many others are completely vanished from the SERPs,
And plenty with little to no more effect on the Money site keywords,

It all depends on your approach, tier 2 link, niche, etc...
I'm testing a similar stuff currently, it would take some time, but i hope it would be useful for users for at least with the current SEO adaptations

the algo changes overtime, the competition matters, a lot of factors are being calculated.
Yes, the point is it's getting harder to rank compared to decade ago but some still work, some just wont

 

[toytarao]

Rather, I think that instead of what to use? It's a good look at how to use it? important factor

 

[Guestwriting]

When building Tier 1 links, it's recommended to choose links carefully, prioritising relevance and quality. Manual link building is advisable for Tier 1, as it allows for a more targeted and controlled approach. Tools like GSA can be considered for Tier 2 or Tier 3 strategies, where the emphasis is often on increasing the backlink count, as the quality of links may be less certain.

 

[jeffro89]

Any link you create yourself is worthless. A complete waste of your time. If you just looking for link diversity, go for it. If you want to rank using those links, forget about it bro... even if you build 10000 of those links. No matter what niche, the needle aint moving. Dnt beilive me, go build yourself some links and learn for yourself. Even backlinks from wikipedia dont do shit. Ive been testing for years. The link sellers on BHW will ofcourse disagree with me.. but you know why those disagree with what i said.

 

[SEO Sparton]

only the backlink count will increase and there won't be use with these links except your site getting penalized. so don't use those links much.

 

[hideath]

the algo changes overtime, the competition matters, a lot of factors are being calculated.
Yes, the point is it's getting harder to rank compared to decade ago but some still work, some just wont

The point is not that they either work or not,
Are they worthy for the long term, is the ROI good enough compared to all of the other methods which will require you less experience, knowledge, time and probably with the same budget,
You would spend around $300-400 to create a ton of web 2.0s that won't even stay there forever,
I normally prefer investing in expired domain and build a PBN instead, probably will take some more time, but the results are better for the long term and way too safer

 

[ryan-isra]

The point is not that they either work or not,
Are they worthy for the long term, is the ROI good enough compared to all of the other methods which will require you less experience, knowledge, time and probably with the same budget,
You would spend around $300-400 to create a ton of web 2.0s that won't even stay there forever,
I normally prefer investing in expired domain and build a PBN instead, probably will take some more time, but the results are better for the long term and way too safer

In the context of long term benefits, I couldn’t have said it any better.
It takes more effort for those expired domains but wayyyy much better...

 

[jon_xx_x]

The point is not that they either work or not,
Are they worthy for the long term, is the ROI good enough compared to all of the other methods which will require you less experience, knowledge, time and probably with the same budget,
You would spend around $300-400 to create a ton of web 2.0s that won't even stay there forever,
I normally prefer investing in expired domain and build a PBN instead, probably will take some more time, but the results are better for the long term and way too saf

Do you put some of the links on inner pages to your money site as well? I have about 30 pbns I have built but scared to use all homepage links to my money site.

 

[hideath]

Do you put some of the links on inner pages to your money site as well? I have about 30 pbns I have built but scared to use all homepage links to my money site.

It all depends on the website, the number of pages, keywords, internal links and other factors,
A good rule would be to start with 5-15 of them pointing to the homepage, then add more to specific pages to boost specific keywords/pages

 

[blackbeans]

OP, I don't want to rain on your parade but when it comes to RETURN ON EFFORT (ROE), your best bet would be to just build a PBN network or buy from a legit PBN network

 

[ciphercipher1]

Yes, web 2.0 sites can be used as tier 1 links. They can help to boost SEO rankings and increase website visibility. However, it is important to create quality content and anchor text for these links in order to ensure they are effective.

but how if the most of them are nofollow?