Lol 29.4s loading time is just isane (even 6.2s is insane)
Not denying op service at all but your traffic might have been 0 visits / month regarding these load times (you should get way more traffic since opti but even 6.2s is a problem ... divide it per 3 or 4 and you'll get between 3 to 10 more traffic (I'm no one one to tell that but if you owe me I might optimize that ... I'm not blue by now so I guess I'm infringing rules saying that ... Let's a mod confirm :
@BassTrackerBoats or
@Zwielicht ... If this is the case I'd by blue and help you if you need ) ...
@kindablack let's say I've been optimizing things as I could and I'm hosting by example a site with over than 40k posts (self hosting with litespeed, redis, cloudflare, litespeed cache/quic.cloud) ...
Let's say it's kind of an online shop ... So prices are regularly updated ... Each pages are doing heavy requests such as "most seen products" and "latest price decreases" stored as custom fields (requests are done on scroll in ajax if they're in viewport but are heavy as I'm querying all products or just getting them by cat ...)
Stats are here for homepage (using adsense which is a real pitfall in load times) :
- PAGESPEED for desktop : 99
- PAGESPEED for mobile : 21 (WTF)
- GT METRIX :
View attachment 138427View attachment 138427
- PINGDOM (tested from far far away) :
View attachment 138428
I've done my best but I'd bee glad to hear you promise you can do better (especially for pagespeed on mobile without relying to amp ...) and let's say 2x times less for the price you say ?
Which means at least 100% everywhere and at least 42 on mobile from psi ?
I'd be glad to here from you ...
Let's say apart load times nothing else is interesting me in your service, but if you can guarantee better results (100% everywhere apart from pagespeed on mobile) and especially at minus double my score on pagespeed for mobile, I'd pay you for your service, but won't pay nothing if this not the case ... Let me know if you're interested ...
But It seems it's the best challenge you've ever got
View attachment 138427View attachment 138428