did you get this message from YouTube or music distributor?
music distributor and i talked to them and they said they got notification from Youtube. So be careful. What distributor you with? Im with routenote
did you get this message from YouTube or music distributor?
music distributor and i talked to them and they said they got notification from Youtube. So be careful. What distributor you with? Im with routenote
I got remonetized and stopped doing it. I removed claimed tracks with editor so I can monetize with adsense. Did you make any money with it? I was doing it for about three weeks only so I didn't see any money out of it
yea ive made about $1.5k with it
that's awesome. in what time period?
I'm also interested in this. Same thing happened to me and now I'm giving 20 percent to Tunecore. How can you help?
Hi,
How long it took for Tunecore to enable the Content ID?
Thanks
So my channel was recently demonetized. However with my MCN I have worked up a deal that I would use music copyrighted by them and they would claim my videos and then we would split the ad-revenue.
Now, does this actually work? I don't know if this violates YouTube's terms of service but I was told to stay pretty quiet about it just in case so I don't risk getting terminated. Has anyone tried something similar and do I have risk getting myself terminated if I do this?
I have never heard of a scenario like this before.
There is no limit that I'm aware of in terms of copyright claims on music as long as the right's holder has given permission for UGC within the Content ID system.
The question is if your MCN really does own the master recordings and whether they actually have the rights to the music like they claim they do.
There is a lot of murkiness surrounding artists giving a creative commons license on their music, tons of creators use the music, and then like 5 years later those same recordings enter Content ID and claims start being sent out en masse. I don't know if your MCN is just snatching up creative commons songs and then passing them off as if they own it in Content ID, which by the way, there has been a ton of abuse of Content ID so nothing is really out of the question there.
Anyways, I guess bottom line, I don't know the answer to your question without more information.
How are things now? Did the music affiliate say anything to you?warning i got this message today. Im doing waht your donig. But they said this
"
It has been bought to our attention that your account has been directly involved in YouTube Partner Programme circumvention through the use of sound recording assets uploaded to Content ID claiming ineligible video content. Action has been taken to remove your assets from YouTube and all payments on your account will be frozen until such time as an investigation has concluded. Please be aware that we take any abuse, gaming, copyright and IP theft allegations very seriously and are within our rights to remove any content we deem ineligible or inappropriate. We are working closely with our partners during this investigation. Please refrain from contacting us regarding this time. We will contact you when more details are available."
I found a reddit user who has received the exact same message and from their most recent reply 1 month ago they haven't gotten an update in months + can't withdraw their money:How are things now? Did the music affiliate say anything to you?
bumpI'm really curious about this too since I have a friend who has just started to use this method. I haven't heard of anyone running into any issues until I saw aaddyy227's post about the message from the distributor.
Can someone with experience in this method clear the air? Are there more potential risks/consequences besides channel termination?
I think it has to be just Routenote because I haven't seen anyone else run into this issue. Maybe YouTube has been trying to contact these music distribution companies to help crack down on this method but they either have been ignored or very little action has been taken. In my experience I have dealt with a few shady music distributors (one disabled their support email and ticket system and ignore all requests on social media lol) and they're still allowed to use YouTube's content ID system.I'm curious if this is just Routenote being especially careful or if YouTube is actually cracking down on this. I understand why it would make YT angry but to my mind it's totally legitimate to get a piece of the revenue if you own the copyright to music in the video. You aren't claiming to own the whole video, just the song. If YT really cared then they would just ban compilation channels entirely or actually demonetize them instead of running ads on them and keeping 45%.
In my experience repost type channels generally only get banned if they're super spammy. I could see YouTube cracking down on this though because some people take it to far and just repost entire songs that are trending and then slap 40 seconds of cheesy Casio keyboards at the end that make it a little too obvious what they're doing.
Hi there, I'm new from my knowledge you get a certain number of strikes than you may get terminatedSo my channel was recently demonetized. However with my MCN I have worked up a deal that I would use music copyrighted by them and they would claim my videos and then we would split the ad-revenue.
Now, does this actually work? I don't know if this violates YouTube's terms of service but I was told to stay pretty quiet about it just in case so I don't risk getting terminated. Has anyone tried something similar and do I have risk getting myself terminated if I do this?
why would they sue him when he has to use routenote to claim for him.I talked with one person who monetized films produced by large companies through musical partnerships. Several months ago, music distributors (including Routenote) wrote to him, and they said they would sue him. Have music distributors written to anyone else that they are preparing for lawsuits?
This is the third time I heard about this but nothing has happened yet. I think they're threatening people so they can stop but they won't take any action. Maybe it's because he's was trying to monetize big movies? Movie studios don't mess around lol.I talked with one person who monetized films produced by large companies through musical partnerships. Several months ago, music distributors (including Routenote) wrote to him, and they said they would sue him. Have music distributors written to anyone else that they are preparing for lawsuits?
The only way YouTube can stop this method permanently in my opinion is if they didn't allow small / independent music distributors access to the content ID system. Of course doing so would hurt their ability to compete against Spotify, Apple Music, etc since they allow small / independent music distributors to use their service and monetize their streams. People do similar methods on Spotify, Apple Music etc and they haven't been able to figure out a solution to permanently stop them.