Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi

When I have used Domain Lookup, it seems the software isn't accurate to check the domain available.

http://prntscr.com/kbow3r

When I have checked with the real registar... the domain is available... http://prntscr.com/kbox53

Another example: https://prnt.sc/kboxsw
Check with real registar: http://prntscr.com/kboy81

How to solve this issue?
Its very accurate on .coms. There are a few tlds from a select few countries or random tlds that dont' always work due to how those whois servers work, but its the exception not the rule.

What is likely the issue is your ISP is hijacking those requests and sending them to a page trying to make money on them. Or its security software or some other 3rd party software interfering.

So load up that domain in your browser, does it return a 404 or some random parked page from your ISP?

you can try using google DNS or turn off that feature in your ISP (Ive heard some offer it).

Also whitelist the expired finder and the whole scrapebox folder in all security software.
 
I havee been emailing back and forth with Scrapebox support team for the past 1 week and I have to say the support is amazing.

Keep up the good work and never stop release more premium plugins.
 
Its very accurate on .coms. There are a few tlds from a select few countries or random tlds that dont' always work due to how those whois servers work, but its the exception not the rule.

What is likely the issue is your ISP is hijacking those requests and sending them to a page trying to make money on them. Or its security software or some other 3rd party software interfering.

So load up that domain in your browser, does it return a 404 or some random parked page from your ISP?

you can try using google DNS or turn off that feature in your ISP (Ive heard some offer it).

Also whitelist the expired finder and the whole scrapebox folder in all security software.

thanks loopline.. when I open the domain in my browser, my ISP redirects me into a specific domain...

It seems I need to use proxy
 
Can someone explain what this error is caused by?

exception number : 1
exception class : EAccessViolation
exception message : Access violation at address 00000000770E3290 in module 'ntdll.dll'. Read of address 000004A299BA0268.

Whenever I run multiple SB's at the same time, one of them always seems to crash with this error. Or, if I use for example more than 1000 threads in proxy checker, SB crashes with the same error. I've tried to research this issue on Delphi forums among other places, but no one has a clear answer.

It seems like some Windows Update altered the ntdll.dll file, I'm thinking kernelmode driver framework 1.11. I always figured it was good to install this update on every new Windows 7 install but now I'm having second thoughts. Wondering if it's Microsoft trying to make things more "secure" and causing SB to crash because it's trying to access a part of the memory that the new ntdll.dll isn't allowing.

Thanks!
 
thanks loopline.. when I open the domain in my browser, my ISP redirects me into a specific domain...

It seems I need to use proxy

A proxy won't likely fix it, although it may. Because your ISP may still redirect you. You can use google public DNS and bypass your ISP all together (probably). Things to try anyway.

Can someone explain what this error is caused by?

exception number : 1
exception class : EAccessViolation
exception message : Access violation at address 00000000770E3290 in module 'ntdll.dll'. Read of address 000004A299BA0268.

Whenever I run multiple SB's at the same time, one of them always seems to crash with this error. Or, if I use for example more than 1000 threads in proxy checker, SB crashes with the same error. I've tried to research this issue on Delphi forums among other places, but no one has a clear answer.

It seems like some Windows Update altered the ntdll.dll file, I'm thinking kernelmode driver framework 1.11. I always figured it was good to install this update on every new Windows 7 install but now I'm having second thoughts. Wondering if it's Microsoft trying to make things more "secure" and causing SB to crash because it's trying to access a part of the memory that the new ntdll.dll isn't allowing.

Thanks!

mail the file to support and they can give you a more clear explanation. Its the bugreport.txt file they need.
 
For the premium article scraper, is it possible to implement an API for Copyscape testing on articles that are generated?
 
For the premium article scraper, is it possible to implement an API for Copyscape testing on articles that are generated?
They said they would think about it, but its not necessarily on the todo list. So basically its a maybe down the track, maybe not.
 
Hello scrapebox team, thanks for awesome software!
I noticed a bug at page scanner plugin, it appeared 2 times in a row to me.
After I imported list of 1m urls to page scanner and run it, it go fine until the end, at the end some threads stopped at urls forever, lets say 5 of them, they didn't timed out, usually I click abort, so they all stop and I can export results.
But 2 days ago after scan finished and I click abort because of some dead threads, one remain after that and I couldn't export anything, I had to kill process and start again. Yesterday I tried again, it was scanning all day, but in the end there was 1 threat that I couldn't abort, so again, all day wasted.

Short version: sometimes it is impossible to abort page scanner plugin and export results.
 

Hi matt

For some reason i need to list Search result from the last page , and scrapebox scrape result seems random (not based the position in serp)

any trick to find out which result is in position let say 80 or 99? from scrape log maybe?
 
loopline!!

I am having problems "grabbing emails" from URLs that I harvested
1. I entered keyword
2. added my 50 proxies. 'use proxies' cehceked
3. i tried proxy results 1000, 44, 55. I still have errors with grabbing emails (see #6
4. I clicked Start Harvesting. tried with google / yahoo/bing. i still get errors (see #6
5. I click "grab e-mails from crawling sites ( harvested URLs)
6. Useragent: blank, also tried clicking random one
box checked for 'use harvested urls' deptth: 1.... delay=none. fixed 0, random between 0 and 0, proxy retries 0. I click START. .....then it says processing but it doesn't move?????????? it just stays stuck at processing

edit: i tried it again with a lower proxy result and it worked. Does this mean I need more proxies to get more results?
 
Hello scrapebox team, thanks for awesome software!
I noticed a bug at page scanner plugin, it appeared 2 times in a row to me.
After I imported list of 1m urls to page scanner and run it, it go fine until the end, at the end some threads stopped at urls forever, lets say 5 of them, they didn't timed out, usually I click abort, so they all stop and I can export results.
But 2 days ago after scan finished and I click abort because of some dead threads, one remain after that and I couldn't export anything, I had to kill process and start again. Yesterday I tried again, it was scanning all day, but in the end there was 1 threat that I couldn't abort, so again, all day wasted.

Short version: sometimes it is impossible to abort page scanner plugin and export results.

That means that something has locked 1 or more of the threads. This can be security software such as anti-virus, malware checkers and firewalls. So you should whitelist scrapebox in all security software and then you can whitelist the entire scrapebox folder as well.

Further any program that accesses the internet can lock threads, things like skype, utorrent etc… So you can try closing down any unneeded programs. Then if its working you can turn programs back on 1 by 1 to find the culprit.

Further pc optimization software can lock threads so you can shut any such software down.

Take note that disabling security software (such as anti-virus, malware checkers and firewalls) often only stops new rules form forming, but allows existing rules to still fire. So you have to fully whitelist in the security software or uninstall the security software(as a test).

Further some security softwar requires you to whitelist in more then one place before it takes effect.

Also note that disabling a router firewall, does actually fully disable it.

Basically you have to sort out what is locking the threads, because scrapebox is forced to wait until all threads are released. On occasion it can be windows that does it, so you can try restarting your machine and/or lowering total connections.

Hi matt

For some reason i need to list Search result from the last page , and scrapebox scrape result seems random (not based the position in serp)

any trick to find out which result is in position let say 80 or 99? from scrape log maybe?

Well you could use detailed harvester as it keeps them in order, but custom harvester is all about mass and speed so it doesn't care about order, it just goes as quick as possible and fills results.

Or if you have the rank tracker plugin, that might be a convenient use of that plugin.

loopline!!

I am having problems "grabbing emails" from URLs that I harvested
1. I entered keyword
2. added my 50 proxies. 'use proxies' cehceked
3. i tried proxy results 1000, 44, 55. I still have errors with grabbing emails (see #6
4. I clicked Start Harvesting. tried with google / yahoo/bing. i still get errors (see #6
5. I click "grab e-mails from crawling sites ( harvested URLs)
6. Useragent: blank, also tried clicking random one
box checked for 'use harvested urls' deptth: 1.... delay=none. fixed 0, random between 0 and 0, proxy retries 0. I click START. .....then it says processing but it doesn't move?????????? it just stays stuck at processing

edit: i tried it again with a lower proxy result and it worked. Does this mean I need more proxies to get more results?

I replied your other threads, but you should use either no proxies or only private proxies. But really just try 2 connections and no proxies and it will probably hum along nicely.
 
Well you could use detailed harvester as it keeps them in order, but custom harvester is all about mass and speed so it doesn't care about order, it just goes as quick as possible and fills results.

Or if you have the rank tracker plugin, that might be a convenient use of that plugin.

no matt, i have my own rank tracker ...im not trying to track position but for articles creation as resources ..i don't want to add page who already in first result in serp

===edit==
i saw that menu now, before this i didn't know that menu exist ..thanks matt lets me give it a try
 
no matt, i have my own rank tracker ...im not trying to track position but for articles creation as resources ..i don't want to add page who already in first result in serp

===edit==
i saw that menu now, before this i didn't know that menu exist ..thanks matt lets me give it a try
Your welcome. If that doesn't work let me know, because after your reply I feel less confident that I fully understand what your trying to do.
 
Your welcome. If that doesn't work let me know, because after your reply I feel less confident that I fully understand what your trying to do.

when you creating articles ,usually you put an external resources such as wikipedia or any big authority sites and usually they were in page one serp (overtime they usually getting stronger)
what im trying to do is get this external resources from last page of serp result (not big website) ..sometime we are to lazy to browse the serp result manually ,so im looking a way to do this using scrapebox

its not to important but it really help speed up the process
 
when you creating articles ,usually you put an external resources such as wikipedia or any big authority sites and usually they were in page one serp (overtime they usually getting stronger)
what im trying to do is get this external resources from last page of serp result (not big website) ..sometime we are to lazy to browse the serp result manually ,so im looking a way to do this using scrapebox

its not to important but it really help speed up the process
got it, ok, then using the detailed harvester and attaching the keyword is probably the best way to go.
 
Hello, I have tried to scrape emails from Craigslist but it seems it doesn't work now. I used to do it last year and it worked fine then. Is it possible that the issue is on my side or it just doesn't work with CL anymore? Thanks for your help in advance.
 
Hello, I have tried to scrape emails from Craigslist but it seems it doesn't work now. I used to do it last year and it worked fine then. Is it possible that the issue is on my side or it just doesn't work with CL anymore? Thanks for your help in advance.
CL has gotten very good at blocking Scrapers. I would personally say that the days of Scraping mails from CL is coming to a close if not perhaps already. Now Im not saying there isn't a way, but even when I have messed with it of late to help someone, I could barely get it to work, some of the time.
 
CL has gotten very good at blocking Scrapers. I would personally say that the days of Scraping mails from CL is coming to a close if not perhaps already. Now Im not saying there isn't a way, but even when I have messed with it of late to help someone, I could barely get it to work, some of the time.

As always you can be counted on, thanks loopline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top