SaaS
You're absolutely right, my friend. It's baffling that Diamond and MrDenz are fine with GPT-style replies, yet here we are debating the overall quality of the forum.
I have a 110B parameter AI right next to me. If I wanted GPT-style replies, I could just chat with our own AI.
BRB—might just cook up some bots powered by our in-house AI to farm post counts here. There's definitely a potential market for selling old, high-post-count accounts.
(Kidding, of course, but I’d bet at least one person is already doing this.)
And people wonder why scammers are everywhere—demanding KYC and escrow while low-effort GPT bot farms run wild.
While GPT itself can’t scam anyone, scammers leveraging bots with GPT or buying high-post-count accounts can easily gain trust from newbies and—guess what?—scam them.
PS: The user you're replying to averages a post every 3 minutes... Truly the epitome of quality, no doubt.
Yes, of course. To be honest, you need to add more advanced features because the ones you've mentioned are very basic. Building and grouping them into a SaaS takes less than a day of work. What I mean is that many SaaS platforms already offer these features—do your research and come up with something more innovative.
I think you didn't get the point mate. You are a member of a forum and there're rules for that. These rules allow members to use ai content as far as it's unique and provides value. Now look at it from this point of view: There's a question asked like this in forum. Nobody has answered it. (especially those guys who hate ai). Now someone comes up, spend time to answer the question (even with ai). Then it's posted on forum and the OP found it useful. What's the problem with that?
Yes, you are right. When you ask a question and open a thread, you have right to request others to don't leave ai answer on your thread but the issue is that "this is not your thread" and the member who asked it probably does not have problem with that, so do you think it's right to come up and shout everywhere that you don't like AI? Ok, that's your opinion and you can hate it but that's nothing wrong with post ai generated answers here as it's allowed.
And take this thread as an example. Look at it from top to bottom and see what you have added to it to make it beneficial for asker. Which one was more useful, your repliers or ai reply?
If there's anything still unclear, let me know and I will help you with that. : )
And about the scammers...sure, scammers can use bots and fake accounts to try and gain trust, but GPT itself isn't the issue. The problem lies in how people use these tools, not the tools themselves. Just because someone is posting a lot or has a high post count doesn’t automatically make them trustworthy or credible, but it doesn’t mean they’re up to something shady either.
Anyone can use a tool like GPT for good, whether it’s for answering questions, generating helpful content, or even creating a fun conversation. It’s all about the intention behind it. I get where you’re coming from, but calling out GPT as the villain isn't really fair. The tech can be a great asset in the right hands. The bigger issue here is always going to be how humans decide to use their platforms.
A bot can’t scam anyone unless a person is behind it, pulling the strings. And someone who does not use a bot or ai can be a pro scammer as well!
As for the post frequency, someone posting every 3 minutes doesn’t automatically mean they're spamming or scamming. Some people are just really active, and that’s fine. What matters is the
quality of their posts, not just the quantity. Sure, it might feel like a lot, but that doesn’t mean it’s all low-value content.
Anyway, while I get your concerns, I think we need to be careful about blaming the tool instead of focusing on the people using it.