Why I stopped Explaining Myself In Cold Outreach

YoursTruLee

Newbie
Joined
Jun 1, 2026
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
I’ve been doing outreach for Web3, AI and SaaS projects for a while now, and one thing kept bothering me.

I’d see people with genuinely good services getting ignored, while others with average offers somehow managed to get replies.

At first, I thought it was all about having a better product.

I was wrong.

After looking through my own outreach and reading messages other people were sending, I realised the biggest mistake wasn’t the product. It was the message.

Most people start by talking about themselves.

“I’m a marketer…”

“I’m a developer…”

“I offer…”

“I’ve worked with…”

The person receiving the message doesn’t know you yet.

More importantly, they’re probably busy.

If you’re messaging a founder, they could be dealing with customers, meetings, hiring or product issues.

If it’s a developer, they’re probably writing code or fixing bugs.

If it’s a recruiter, they’ve likely opened dozens of similar messages already.

Nobody wakes up hoping to read another five-paragraph introduction.

One thing that helped me was changing the order of my message.

Instead of starting with myself, I started with them.

I looked at what they were building.

I tried to understand where they might need help.

Then I wrote my message around that instead of around me.

Ironically, my messages became shorter, but I started getting more replies.

Another thing I stopped doing was copying templates from the internet.

Most of those templates have been used hundreds of times already. Even after changing the company name, they still read like copied messages.

I’ve also noticed more people relying entirely on AI to write outreach.

Personally, I think AI is great for fixing grammar or improving clarity.

I don’t think it’s a good replacement for your own observations and experience. Generic messages are becoming easier to spot.

I’m curious to hear from others here.

What’s one change you’ve made that noticeably improved your reply rate when doing cold outreach?

P.S. I’ve put together a few pitching templates based on messages that have actually worked for me over the years. They’re meant to be adapted, not copied word for word. If anyone would find them useful, let me know and I’ll share a few.
 
wait, was this written by AI ? feels like AI I might be wrong, If not, prove me wrong.
 
Why
wait, was this written by AI ? feels like AI I might be wrong, If not, prove me wrong.
would you say that mate? Are you one of those who hate to see ai assisted posts? AI helps me correct grammar not think for me.

wait, was this written by AI ? feels like AI I might be wrong, If not, prove me wrong.
Also it is "I might be right, if not prove me wrong"
 
I’ve been doing outreach for Web3, AI and SaaS projects for a while now, and one thing kept bothering me.

I’d see people with genuinely good services getting ignored, while others with average offers somehow managed to get replies.

At first, I thought it was all about having a better product.

I was wrong.

After looking through my own outreach and reading messages other people were sending, I realised the biggest mistake wasn’t the product. It was the message.

Most people start by talking about themselves.

“I’m a marketer…”

“I’m a developer…”

“I offer…”

“I’ve worked with…”

The person receiving the message doesn’t know you yet.

More importantly, they’re probably busy.

If you’re messaging a founder, they could be dealing with customers, meetings, hiring or product issues.

If it’s a developer, they’re probably writing code or fixing bugs.

If it’s a recruiter, they’ve likely opened dozens of similar messages already.

Nobody wakes up hoping to read another five-paragraph introduction.

One thing that helped me was changing the order of my message.

Instead of starting with myself, I started with them.

I looked at what they were building.

I tried to understand where they might need help.

Then I wrote my message around that instead of around me.

Ironically, my messages became shorter, but I started getting more replies.

Another thing I stopped doing was copying templates from the internet.

Most of those templates have been used hundreds of times already. Even after changing the company name, they still read like copied messages.

I’ve also noticed more people relying entirely on AI to write outreach.

Personally, I think AI is great for fixing grammar or improving clarity.

I don’t think it’s a good replacement for your own observations and experience. Generic messages are becoming easier to spot.

I’m curious to hear from others here.

What’s one change you’ve made that noticeably improved your reply rate when doing cold outreach?

P.S. I’ve put together a few pitching templates based on messages that have actually worked for me over the years. They’re meant to be adapted, not copied word for word. If anyone would find them useful, let me know and I’ll share a few.
Auto suggest thats just about it. Agreed. No actual content writing cause we all know it cant truly do it yet anyway. Unless a breakthrough happens. So yes. And like ive said elsewhere hollywod had to learn the hardway its simply not AGI and hasnt that long time even still. It would soon as forget important details. Even if your have a large context window/s. It might dump it to squach compress it down so...Yeah...Not the direct of the methods.
 
Auto suggest thats just about it. Agreed. No actual content writing cause we all know it cant truly do it yet anyway. Unless a breakthrough happens. So yes. And like ive said elsewhere hollywod had to learn the hardway its simply not AGI and hasnt that long time even still. It would soon as forget important details. Even if your have a large context window/s. It might dump it to squach compress it down so...Yeah...Not the direct of the methods.

Auto suggest thats just about it. Agreed. No actual content writing cause we all know it cant truly do it yet anyway. Unless a breakthrough happens. So yes. And like ive said elsewhere hollywod had to learn the hardway its simply not AGI and hasnt that long time even still. It would soon as forget important details. Even if your have a large context window/s. It might dump it to squach compress it down so...Yeah...Not the direct of the methods.
Apologies mate, I'm trying to understand this contribution.
 
The whole "is this AI or not" thing kinda buried the actual question lol. To answer what you asked... the biggest jump for me was cutting the pitch out of the first message entirely. First touch is just one line referencing something they actually did or shipped, no offer, no link. You're not selling yet, you're just getting them to read line two.

The other thing nobody talks about is timing. Same message sent tuesday morning vs friday afternoon gets wildly different reply rates. I test send times almost as much as I test copy now.

And yeah I'd take a look at those templates @YoursTruLee, not to copy but seeing the structure of what worked for you is useful. The people getting mad about grammar checkers are missing the point tbh... using AI to clean up your own thoughts is nothing like having it write the whole thing from scratch.
 
Basically all iam saying is. Yes it very limited in creative writing capability at the moment.
Oh okay, I get you now

The whole "is this AI or not" thing kinda buried the actual question lol. To answer what you asked... the biggest jump for me was cutting the pitch out of the first message entirely. First touch is just one line referencing something they actually did or shipped, no offer, no link. You're not selling yet, you're just getting them to read line two.

The other thing nobody talks about is timing. Same message sent tuesday morning vs friday afternoon gets wildly different reply rates. I test send times almost as much as I test copy now.

And yeah I'd take a look at those templates @YoursTruLee, not to copy but seeing the structure of what worked for you is useful. The people getting mad about grammar checkers are missing the point tbh... using AI to clean up your own thoughts is nothing like having it write the whole thing from scratch.
This comment just made my day. There is hope. Thanks mate x
 
This matches my experiance too, opening with "I noticed you..." gets way better replys than "I'm a...". Guess people just wanna know whats in it for them stright away.
 
This matches my experiance too, opening with "I noticed you..." gets way better replys than "I'm a...". Guess people just wanna know whats in it for them stright away.
Yeah, make pitches about them not about you and they will listen.
 
Also, ethically or unethically, depending on how you wanna look at it. I do a little digging on the client beforehand. Might start with an old gamertag, or bring up something from their high school days and play it off like, “Nah, that’s my big bro who was from another class.” Lowkey, that’s how I keep around an 80% close rate and a 98% reply rate.
 
Also, ethically or unethically, depending on how you wanna look at it. I do a little digging on the client beforehand. Might start with an old gamertag, or bring up something from their high school days and play it off like, “Nah, that’s my big bro who was from another class.” Lowkey, that’s how I keep around an 80% close rate and a 98% reply rate.
That's a new one. Does this work for remote work as well or just physical clients?
 
Yeah, coz I only work remote. Also, moving forward when they are attached and shii', I just keep it real with them and they all get impressed.
Yes, I am aware about the whole system of being honest about results.
 
Why

would you say that mate? Are you one of those who hate to see ai assisted posts? AI helps me correct grammar not think for me.


Also it is "I might be right, if not prove me wrong"
I just skip AI posts and never try to even read through.


finally read through.

my take :
1. for cold email to work, you need proper branding. most people are probably going ton search for you online if they find your offer interesting, unless you sell to some low tier customers. im sure you are reaching out to business. so get some content on fb, tikok , youtube, setup clutch and trustpilot reviews.

2. if you have a good offer, your message should be targeted to your icps painpoint and you get a much higher response rate.

3. followup. yes in cold email still they tell you to f$k off.
 
Same experience here. The biggest jump in reply rates came when I made the first line about their business instead of my service. People can tell in a few seconds whether the message was written for them or copied and pasted.
 
I just skip AI posts and never try to even read through.


finally read through.

my take :
1. for cold email to work, you need proper branding. most people are probably going ton search for you online if they find your offer interesting, unless you sell to some low tier customers. im sure you are reaching out to business. so get some content on fb, tikok , youtube, setup clutch and trustpilot reviews.

2. if you have a good offer, your message should be targeted to your icps painpoint and you get a much higher response rate.

3. followup. yes in cold email still they tell you to f$k off.
This is what you should have commented rather than policing people content with "is this AI" remarks. Thank you for your sensible remark.
 
@qahnaxy that gamertag angle is wild but sounds pretty hard to scale if you are doing any real volume.

a decent middle ground is trigger-based outreach. instead of digging through high school stuff, just scrape for specific events... like if a startup just launched on product hunt or they are actively hiring for a role you can solve. the pain point is already active and they actually have a budget.

also keeping the whole pitch under 3-4 sentences is key. if they have to scroll on a phone to read it, it's going in the trash.
 
@CloudMerchant is right about the scaling issue. doing deep manual research like @qahnaxy is fine if you are chasing high ticket clients, but it kills your volume. a good middle ground is finding automated "hooks" that look manual. like scraping their site for broken links or specific analytics pixel errors, then emailing them about it. looks like you spent 10 minutes auditing their site when it actually took a python script 2 seconds... they reply almost every time because you actually pointed out a real issue.
 
Back
Top