That is an entirely different concept. It doesn't involve human traffic. Both my method and content locking require human traffic. If you don't have traffic, no matter what method you use, you won't make money. A bot is just cheating. =P And you'd need really good proxies.but thinking this way or argumenting this way could also lead to this question:
if someone writes a bot with proxy switching and autofilling, it would be the same in that aspect :/
That is an entirely different concept. It doesn't involve human traffic. Both my method and content locking require human traffic. If you don't have traffic, no matter what method you use, you won't make money. A bot is just cheating. =P And you'd need really good proxies.
I dont think you fully understand the concept Jaykub let me explainHmm kay i really want to try this but what can happen worst case? If it is only a bann at the cpa network i would thank god - but going to court or sth would KILL me
Well it is a real ip, but yea pretty much using their own ip to submit a stealth submit. Now this is very advanced cause you have to remember the xss exploits can be patched so unless you have ways to find xss exploits with ease i totally dont recommend doing this .i knew the concept before your post but thanks for explaining it, makes things clear for the one's who didn't know what this is all about
i don't know - the only thing is that u use the IPs of others for stealth submit, if only a real ip would make that more blackhat than illegal that would be great ^^ i think it for some it is blackhat for some others fraud / illegal
do you use it ? have u success with it ? the script is a money generator lol
It's fraudulent either way, whether you are using your own email addresses, or others.
Find me one network that is ok with this.
So because a network doesn't approve of the method, it's fraud?
Let me ask if you've ever placed a content lock on a site. Do you explicitly tell the user that you're framing a promotional offer, you get paid for their e-mail, and they will be spammed with other promotional offers? Or do you tell them some story about how they need to put it an e-mail to access protected content? By your own definition, the second one is fraud and the first will never generate a single penny for you.No, what makes it fraud is submitting a persons email without their knowledge or consent.
Let me ask if you've ever placed a content lock on a site. Do you explicitly tell the user that you're framing a promotional offer, you get paid for their e-mail, and they will be spammed with other promotional offers? Or do you tell them some story about how they need to put it an e-mail to access protected content? By your own definition, the second one is fraud and the first will never generate a single penny for you.
If you deliver what you promised, there is no fraud involved in the things you promised to do. However, there is fraud involved in the things you told the user. The full promotional landing pages have fine print on them for a reason. They inform the user of what is done with their e-mail, that it's a promotional offer, etc. You effectively remove this legal promise to the user by not allowing them to see it and not even letting them in on the fact that they're filling out a promotional offer at all. It's called misrepresentation and it can also be legally challenged.Also, if your delivering what you promised in the content lock, then there is no fraud involved.
I have replied to your PM, but for everyone else who would like to know, I currently have listed 9 networks and am looking for more.Hey I PMd you about that list of CPA networks.
I was just wondering, like how many are there and could you send it to me (in my pm I already asked, so just so you know I followed your instructions lol)
Again you're missing the main point. In the content lock example, the USER is filling out the offer himself, not having it unknowingly filled just by visiting a site. In the first instance, he has a choice of whether or not to fill the offer, using your method he does not. Also, if your delivering what you promised in the content lock, then there is no fraud involved.
Look dude, you can try to spin this anyway you want if it makes you sleep better at night. I've seen this type of thing time and time again where someone uses similar methods, only to eventually end up on the wrong side of a lawsuit.
When it all comes down to it, it is up to each individual to do what he/she chooses. I just want to put this out there so that people have a little more information before jumping into something like this, especially the noobs who see this as a quick way to make a buck.
what is about page 2, every cpa network will bann you in no time and won't pay you if you send send blank ref and only email is filled out
You guys will never learn, will you??
Does anyone remember when you had $2.00 email submits?
Wanna know why you don't see those anymore?
Wanna know why that $1.70 email submit is now a .40c email submit?
Well, look at OP's method. You get money in the short run (but not as much as your thinking mr. 5mill email man with the grin on his face! lol), and fuck yourself and other marketers in the long run when advertisers, who price there leads PER SUBMIT, look at their ROI, realize that they are not making a profit, and scale back the cost per lead.
And then a thread pops up on BHW titled "is IM harder?"
BUT, what do I know? I just like to think in common sense terms.
Remember guys, those advertisers are not machines, but REAL PEOPLE who pay out money for the sole purpose of seeing a return on thier investment. Things like this have an INDUSTRY WIDE effect on the offers you get to promote, whther you want to beleive me or not.
Its your account, do so at your own risk!