The Easiest and Quickest $100 A Day I Know

not for me, but is good money.

Ah finally a real reason to try out DNS Version 10 courtesy of the University Computer Store , takes a while to get used to my speech patterns and habits but after 30 minutes of training I got it down pretty well.

Now time to see how well it works rewriting articles

This is a pretty good tutorial. Of course anyone who tries this out should put their own little modifications into it. Make what you do unique. That's where the money is at .

procrastinator said:

Do you need a microphone for the software?

Click to expand...

How would you expect to get the software to capture your voice and enter the text on the screen without a microphone?

The.Viejo said:

In my experiences so far, Dragon Naturally speaking is horrible. About every other word I say it is wrong. I say end over and over and it comes out and, I say it as clearly as possible but the stupid thing doesn't put end. I trained it 2 or 3 times over and still no good. Very good idea though. If only Speech to Text programs were better.

Click to expand...

The thing with speech to text programs is that how well it works is going to greatly depend on the quality of your microphone and whether or not there is a lot of noise in the background.

After you complete the training you need to simply just use the software and make the corrections as you go along. The software will remember your choices of words and phrases for next time so it's sort of "learns" your way of speaking.

Of all the text to speech programs out there Dragon Naturally Speaking is one of the BEST!! So to say it's horrible is incorrect. Try a few other text to speech software and you'll see that Dragon is the best option out there.

Though if your typing speed is very good you could simply obtain the same results by just typing. Though speaking would make things much less of a "chore"

thejman82 said:

How would you expect to get the software to capture your voice and enter the text on the screen without a microphone?

Click to expand...

indeed

I like this! Thank you. This is exactly the thing i needed!

thejman82 said:

The thing with speech to text programs is that how well it works is going to greatly depend on the quality of your microphone and whether or not there is a lot of noise in the background.

After you complete the training you need to simply just use the software and make the corrections as you go along. The software will remember your choices of words and phrases for next time so it's sort of "learns" your way of speaking.

Of all the text to speech programs out there Dragon Naturally Speaking is one of the BEST!! So to say it's horrible is incorrect. Try a few other text to speech software and you'll see that Dragon is the best option out there.

Though if your typing speed is very good you could simply obtain the same results by just typing. Though speaking would make things much less of a "chore"

Click to expand...

lol it doesn't seem to matter how many times people put up great, helpful posts like yours, new members keep posting up in this thread how "It doesn't work"

It works folks! Put some time into training it.

Invest in a quality usb micrpohone and you're set.

How much do you have to change the articles wording? And i haven't really been doing articles they are asking for, i have just been posting really long good ones and i change up as much as i can. Will this work?

Each article has to be at least 85% unique from the original if the original is already online. AC uses Copyscape to check the articles for plagiarism, so if after rewritng (either manually or with DNS) it isn't at least 85% unique to anything else online, AC will reject it. If you get caught by them plagiarizing content too often they will ban your account.

This thing is not worth doing! You will end up with lots of articles but what are you going to do when you have to give your research sources. You will be screwed!

they are not paying well.
you would be better off doing maybe CPA.

When I first came to BHW, I found this AC method and got very excited. I was planning to head down to my local library, reel off a huge pile of articles and take away $4.00 a piece for my 30-40 mins work. I was captivated by the prospect of a quick buck, some nice start up money.

However, as I read more and more about it, I began to realise that there were severe flaws. I've come to conclude that this method is fine if you have nothing in the world, or are already set up financially - but for most of us in the middle, it's not so productive. Why?

Anyone can write articles and make some money - it's sure fire. It might take him all day but a fresh faced new person will take away $6-7 or something like that. In another country, that's a day's food or rent. When you get good at working out what AC will pay well for and employ all the whistles and bells like DNS, you might ramp it up to $30 or $40 a day, maybe $50.

The problem is, $50 a day is not good if you had to write articles all day to get it. Even transcribing them is hard work. As AC are so picky nowadays, the probability that you can find books useful to transcribe a high paying article becomes smaller - and you find yourself actually having to write the articles yourself. This is draining, full-on work. And then there are the account problems for non US citizens and constant account switching to avoid tax forms for those in the US.

Then there's the other end of the scale, where you pay freelancers in poor countries to write articles for you at a cheap rate. If you get a good freelancer team going (if you can afford it, which most people can't), then you can see some real payback from this method. This is a minority case.

I mainly target SEO and that's where most of my skills are. I use DNS to great effect when I need to push out some content. The reason I'm making this post is not to discourage but to get people to think a bit more about what their long term plan might be.

The AC method is great for people who have no money at-all or who can hire a lot of good freelancers, but it's not effectively scalable. IM, SEO and affiliate schemes are much more productive for the people in-between.

Hello, plz i need people with ac experience to help me out here, i submitted my own writen article to ac and it was rejected because i did not state the content source, pls what should i do, and also were should i put the content source?.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hey topekole For the content source you can put something like "personal research done on several authority sites on the given niche/topic" By authority sites I mean mention names of a couple of sites which deal with that particular topic of those articles... Hope that helps...

hey guys newbie here... this method seems good, but once you reach the $500 mark, how do you continue to earn money? ive read all over BHW that people abandon and make new accounts, but if you have to be linked to paypal, do you need new paypal accounts for each AC account?

I'm pretty sure it's already been covered in this thread already. We also talk about it in the first few pages of this thread in the AC sub-forum http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/associated-content-writing-articles/77524-made-30-two-articles-today.html

i am a writer.....and write the articles manually....if anyone interested ay hit me in my gmail: [email protected]

The.Viejo said:

In my experiences so far, Dragon Naturally speaking is horrible. About every other word I say it is wrong. I say end over and over and it comes out and, I say it as clearly as possible but the stupid thing doesn't put end. I trained it 2 or 3 times over and still no good. Very good idea though. If only Speech to Text programs were better.

Click to expand...

Are you using a purchased version of Dragon Naturally Speaking or did you download it for free? When I first downloaded DNS from one of the Torrent sites, I had a helluva time getting it to do my bidding.

After purchasing a legit copy of DNS, it was much easier to use, plus they give you a microphone to use it with. Or it could be you have a bad accent or something.

This is useful. I have a dragon speaking software but haven't put into good use. Now is the time to get the dragon moving with a noob like me.

Thanks.