SEO Link Indexing... Pointless?

A total waste of time, every link not found by Google by itself is utter crap anyway.
 
can help, but can also raise flags and trip filters. Think like google -- what type of sites would be using indexing services? Sites that are trying to game their algo or??!!!!
 
GSA index doesn't work at all. If your link/content is high quality google with index it in time. If your building t2 links than you should use an indexing service.
 
Yes, I use Lover's PBN service here on BHW. I'm not yet convinced its safe for a money site, but I've been getting good results using it as a tier 2.

I would like to test this method too. Can you share how many blog posts you buy per site you want indexed?

E.g. for 10 tier 1 web 2.0 sites you would get xxx blog posts to get those 10 sites indexed.

Just trying to figure out how big a package is needed?

I use gsa ser and submit to google cache ;)
does the trick..

Can you explain this method in more detail?
 
If your links are pure spam shit, then chances are link indexing services won't help.

If your links are a little better quality and a % of them get indexed naturally then some of the better link indexing services can help to get a higher % indexed quicker.

Overall not worth wasting time and money if your links are total shit.
 
You don't need to index your backlinks, just make sure google know their existence
 
If you're using tiers it makes more sense to use an indexing service on your lower quality links as they point to the quality links and can send spiders their means. I have a brand new one planned with similar to what you're saying, I got a wellspring of societal signals, social publications marks and SER but not public bookmarks, instead of using them all togeather I need to use individual batches to them to see whether any single element has the best indexing rate or when it is all working togeather.IMO indexing services have ever been a waste. Developing a grade 2 will get your links. Anything that doesn't require a grade 2 is powerful enough to get indexed on its own.
 
I would like to test this method too. Can you share how many blog posts you buy per site you want indexed?

E.g. for 10 tier 1 web 2.0 sites you would get xxx blog posts to get those 10 sites indexed.

Just trying to figure out how big a package is needed?
I recently bought 300 posts pointed at 15 web 2.0 properties. Just for indexing 10 posts per property would probably do it. I usually start with 20ish per property. The blog posts themselves were picked up within 48 hours of creation. The 2.0s were all indexed shortly after and my site gained some good ground. I didn't use it for indexing though, just one way to juice up my 2.0s. That's why I say, just build good tiers and indexing just happens.
 
I posted the results to my case study here on this. It shows that GSA SEO indexer is a total waste of time and that building a tier for indexing has massively dropped in efficiency recently. One of the indexing services used in the case study was able to get over 90% of links indexed.
Finally got around to reading the post.

I was wondering if you had any experience with ScrapeBox's Add-on for Rapid Indexing?
 
I posted the results to my case study here on this. It shows that GSA SEO indexer is a total waste of time and that building a tier for indexing has massively dropped in efficiency recently. One of the indexing services used in the case study was able to get over 90% of links indexed.


I always take any case studies that provide an aff link with a pinch of salt/not to be trusted.

pQPPAJL
 
Finally got around to reading the post.

I was wondering if you had any experience with ScrapeBox's Add-on for Rapid Indexing?

It's a waste of resources, same with GSA SEO Indexer.

I always take any case studies that provide an aff link with a pinch of salt/not to be trusted.

pQPPAJL

Shaun's provided tons of great, free content about GSA SER here and on the GSA forum. I haven't replicated this particular case study, but he's always been honest about how services were working in the past. Kind of ridiculous for you to call him out as a liar.
 
It's a waste of resources, same with GSA SEO Indexer.



Shaun's provided tons of great, free content about GSA SER here and on the GSA forum. I haven't replicated this particular case study, but he's always been honest about how services were working in the past. Kind of ridiculous for you to call him out as a liar.


I never called him out as a liar, I just stated that I don't trust case studies where a ref/aff link is supplied.

A certain class of SEO guru make their living from noobs.
 
Finally got around to reading the post.

I was wondering if you had any experience with ScrapeBox's Add-on for Rapid Indexing?

Nah mate sorry. If its what i'm thinking of it's not one of their add ons its one of the plugins they offer.

I always take any case studies that provide an aff link with a pinch of salt/not to be trusted.

pQPPAJL

Yea no worries man.

Shaun's provided tons of great, free content about GSA SER here and on the GSA forum. I haven't replicated this particular case study, but he's always been honest about how services were working in the past. Kind of ridiculous for you to call him out as a liar.

Cheers mate :). This is a much bigger forum than the GSA Boards so the mods don't have time to look into the post or the times I have called express indexer out in the past when they let their service slip. It's all good :).

I never called him out as a liar, I just stated that I don't trust case studies where a ref/aff link is supplied.

A certain class of SEO guru make their living from noobs.

Same as a certain class of BST sellers :p.
 
I never called him out as a liar, I just stated that I don't trust case studies where a ref/aff link is supplied.

A certain class of SEO guru make their living from noobs.

You didn't call him a liar. That said, this is a member with 1000+ posts, many of which are lengthy tutorials / explanations of difficult concepts. Can't help but feel that wouldn't have happened if he had a "VIP" or whatever designation attached to his account, considering what I've seen people like Roy whatever get away with on this forum.
 
You didn't call him a liar. That said, this is a member with 1000+ posts, many of which are lengthy tutorials / explanations of difficult concepts. Can't help but feel that wouldn't have happened if he had a "VIP" or whatever designation attached to his account, considering what I've seen people like Roy whatever get away with on this forum.

Roy gets called out like everybody else lol
 
I have to agree. Shaun is bluntly honest. He did not endorse my product and in fact were bashing it (You can check variety of his posts), but I must say he is a very honest guy and because of his background (we talked once before he blocked me lol), his experiment was properly conducted in a disciplined way. But just like everything else, read the materials just as a reference because it only reflects his point of view.

It's a waste of resources, same with GSA SEO Indexer.



Shaun's provided tons of great, free content about GSA SER here and on the GSA forum. I haven't replicated this particular case study, but he's always been honest about how services were working in the past. Kind of ridiculous for you to call him out as a liar.
 
Back
Top