Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[bodzio2018]

AutoPilot Extended Free Trial

 

[Ragchowdary441]

AutoPilot Extended Free Trial

 

[Blue Panda]

AutoPilot Extended Free Trial

 

[Fisherman99]

any free trial left?

 

[thepiratemay]

did sign up but the website is so messed up, couldnt keep cookies? It kept saying to login, had to try 3 different browsers (ff, chrome, brave) and still couldnt get to try it for free as advertised in the home page. It might be a good tool though, cant say cause i cant try it.

 

[V]

AutoPilot Extended Free Trial

 

[Cognitive]

BIG "Thank You" to all of you who took the time to leave a review for our service!
​

###
Everybody should have received details about how to activate the Autopilot Extended Free Trial via PM

 

[Hama]

I tested this tool during its beta-phase and @Cognitive gave me access to the final iteration of the tool today.
I was expecting a lot from this tool...and boy, it did deliver a lot more than expected. This tool is a game-changer.

The flow of the article is perfect, if you ask me. The words count...1300 in 1 minute is excellent. But the most important thing is that the article is relevant and it always stays on topic. As I know a few things about AI models, I can tell you that this is one of the most difficult things: making the AI to stay on topic when writing long-form content without human intervention. I guess this is the reason they’re using 6 different models.
I didn’t do any proper research before asking the AI to write on my topic and I didn’t use the research option inside this tool either. ( although this is a very interesting addition, it uses AI to scan a few competitors and gathers data from like Google Trends, People also asked, Related Searches etc). I just wrote my topic in its designated box, and asked the AI to generate the rest of the details: description, keywords, outlines. All the process took less than 5 minutes and I got this:

I will paste here the entire article:


Here there are the screenshots from their website:

I can’t think of any drawbacks related to this tool. Also, there is no point comparing it with other AI tools because, at least for now, there’s no other GPT-3 tool able to compete with this Autopilot.
However, I can write a few features suggestions: a fact-checking tool, a grammar model, an image selection option. These would be some nice additions to this tool.

Guys, this is check-mate to Jarvis and other similar tools.

Hej dbk03 in this article (https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/jv-my-automated-gpt-3-content-1000-words-minute-your-seo-im-skills-or-leads.1374923/#post-14893476) you wrote that you had developed a tool that uses GPT-3. You didn't have much experience with SEO and internet marketing (which is weird for someone who is a Jr. VIP) so you wanted to work with an experienced person. Now it looks like you are promoting this product is this your GPT-3 tool you have developed ??

 

[Hama]

Has anyone tested whether sensit generates better content than jarvis or rytr ??????

Does anyone have an account with jarvis and sensit to test this?

I'm only interested in the quality of long content that this tool generates.

 

[Hama]

I want to use AI content for my money sites, and some people on blackhatworld say that their AI content is not ranking well or that they are dropt in google. and some don't use it for a money site. Where is the danger? Some say it's impossible for Google to figure out that this is AI content and some say it's possible. And by the way, I'm just asking my questions here because I'm new to GPT-3 tools. I think these kind of tools are a dream for every marketer, including me. I just want to know if it has any risk to my money websites.

I had a text writer that wrote texts for me in English and I sometimes translated them via google translate into other languages for different websites. even here I always thought, because it has been translated via google that google sees that this is an copied text, so some kind of plagiarism risk. That Google might register translations and also use them to discover stolen content. I give an example if you take an article literally from nytimes.com and translate it to German and check it for plagiarism with copyscape, quetext etc you get 100% unique. I'm sure that if google can translate this article in a millisecond it can also trace in a millisecond that it was stolen? but plagiarism programs don't see this.

and yes i know GPT-3 are AI written and unique content and has not been stolen or rewritten. but the software still needs a standard method to scan the web and a method to compose the content. it's not that the AI comes up with ideas unaided. And that's what I mean by doesn't google have any hacks for this?

Is there perhaps an experienced engineer here who has a look at this. if it is completely safe I will use it 100% for my money sites.

 

[dbk03]

Hej dbk03 in this article (https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/j...seo-im-skills-or-leads.1374923/#post-14893476) you wrote that you had developed a tool that uses GPT-3. You didn't have much experience with SEO and internet marketing (which is weird for someone who is a Jr. VIP) so you wanted to work with an experienced person. Now it looks like you are promoting this product is this your GPT-3 tool you have developed ??

WOW...well done, Sherlock....amazing findings!

So it's weird for a Jr.Vip to be unexperienced in terms of SEO? LOL. Guess what? the JrVip rank costs like $100/ year on this fourm. It's not something you earn through SEO/ blackhat experience
Yes, I don't have experience with SEO. Yes, @Cognitive helped me build my AI tools. If you check my recent postings, you will see at least one place where I thank Cognitive for his help. Yes, he also helped other people on this forum with information on how to properly train/ fine-tune AIs etc. Yes, Sensit Autopilot is far superior compared to the tool I built. Here it is another member saying the same thing: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/g...rch-autopilot-assistant.1382244/post-15029160
Of course I wanted to test his tool. And like many others in this thread, I was impressed by it and I wrote the review.

Whatever you do, don't start a detective career...

I want to use AI content for my money sites, and some people on blackhatworld say that their AI content is not ranking well or that they are dropt in google. and some don't use it for a money site. Where is the danger? Some say it's impossible for Google to figure out that this is AI content and some say it's possible. And by the way, I'm just asking my questions here because I'm new to GPT-3 tools. I think these kind of tools are a dream for every marketer, including me. I just want to know if it has any risk to my money websites.

I had a text writer that wrote texts for me in English and I sometimes translated them via google translate into other languages for different websites. even here I always thought, because it has been translated via google that google sees that this is an copied text, so some kind of plagiarism risk. That Google might register translations and also use them to discover stolen content. I give an example if you take an article literally from nytimes.com and translate it to German and check it for plagiarism with copyscape, quetext etc you get 100% unique. I'm sure that if google can translate this article in a millisecond it can also trace in a millisecond that it was stolen? but plagiarism programs don't see this.

and yes i know GPT-3 are AI written and unique content and has not been stolen or rewritten. but the software still needs a standard method to scan the web and a method to compose the content. it's not that the AI comes up with ideas unaided. And that's what I mean by doesn't google have any hacks for this?

Is there perhaps an experienced engineer here who has a look at this. if it is completely safe I will use it 100% for my money sites.

Instead of writing novels here, why don't you try it yourself?
No, GPT-3 or any other Generative Pretrained Transformer, doesn't scan anything on the web. It's exactly what the AI (a Natural Language Processing AI) does.: comes up with ideas without any aid. It uses the data it was trained with.

 

[Cognitive]

I want to use AI content for my money sites, and some people on blackhatworld say that their AI content is not ranking well or that they are dropt in google. and some don't use it for a money site. Where is the danger? Some say it's impossible for Google to figure out that this is AI content and some say it's possible. And by the way, I'm just asking my questions here because I'm new to GPT-3 tools. I think these kind of tools are a dream for every marketer, including me. I just want to know if it has any risk to my money websites.

I had a text writer that wrote texts for me in English and I sometimes translated them via google translate into other languages for different websites. even here I always thought, because it has been translated via google that google sees that this is an copied text, so some kind of plagiarism risk. That Google might register translations and also use them to discover stolen content. I give an example if you take an article literally from nytimes.com and translate it to German and check it for plagiarism with copyscape, quetext etc you get 100% unique. I'm sure that if google can translate this article in a millisecond it can also trace in a millisecond that it was stolen? but plagiarism programs don't see this.

and yes i know GPT-3 are AI written and unique content and has not been stolen or rewritten. but the software still needs a standard method to scan the web and a method to compose the content. it's not that the AI comes up with ideas unaided. And that's what I mean by doesn't google have any hacks for this?

Is there perhaps an experienced engineer here who has a look at this. if it is completely safe I will use it 100% for my money sites.

As John Mueller of Google says in the below video, they're more focused on what the content is able to deliver to the reader, instead of determining how is the content generated. If the content is trash, it will not be indexed. If the content is OK and matches the topic the reader is searching and also it adds some value to that topic, it will definitely be indexed by Google. Actually they built a 1.2 TRILLION parameters AI model (more than 6 times larger than GPT-3) and one of the reasons they did this is because they want their search engine to be able understand what's inside of an article. And, of course, they do have a lot of other indicators that show if a reader is happy with the information delivered by an article.

A couple of things to remember from what John Mueller (Senior Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google.):
"...my feeling is at some point that is going to shift a little bit in the sense that we'll focus more on the quality rather than how (the content) was generated...And in the end if it's low quality content it doesn't matter if it was written by a person or by a machine, it's like it's not that useful for people."

but the software still needs a standard method to scan the web and a method to compose the content. it's not that the AI comes up with ideas unaided

How did you come to the conclusion that a tool like ours that combines multiple large GPT models, some of them having tens of billions of parameters and others being at the scale of hundreds of billions of parameters, all of them being trained on literally Terabytes of curated pure text would still need to "scan" the web? Not that an AI model alone would be able to "scan" the web...but, anyway...
The question "Is an AI able to generate unique content?" is so...2012. The 2022 questions would be: how good the unique AI content can be? How humanly can it look? Can it write better content than humans?...We'll soon find out.

So, let's settle this 2012 question once and for all: No, there is no web scraping, rewriting, paraphrasing, translating, spinning or any other cheap blackhat method of getting "unique" content in our system. It's UNIQUE because that's how GPT models work. The End

 

[Hama]

As John Mueller of Google says in the below video, they're more focused on what the content is able to deliver to the reader, instead of determining how is the content generated. If the content is trash, it will not be indexed. If the content is OK and matches the topic the reader is searching and also it adds some value to that topic, it will definitely be indexed by Google. Actually they built a 1.2 TRILLION parameters AI model (more than 6 times larger than GPT-3) and one of the reasons they did this is because they want their search engine to be able understand what's inside of an article. And, of course, they do have a lot of other indicators that show if a reader is happy with the information delivered by an article.

A couple of things to remember from what John Mueller (Senior Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google.):
"...my feeling is at some point that is going to shift a little bit in the sense that we'll focus more on the quality rather than how (the content) was generated...And in the end if it's low quality content it doesn't matter if it was written by a person or by a machine, it's like it's not that useful for people."



How did you come to the conclusion that a tool like ours that combines multiple large GPT models, some of them having tens of billions of parameters and others being at the scale of hundreds of billions of parameters, all of them being trained on literally Terabytes of curated pure text would still need to "scan" the web? Not that an AI model alone would be able to "scan" the web...but, anyway...
The question "Is an AI able to generate unique content?" is so...2012. The 2022 questions would be: how good the unique AI content can be? How humanly can it look? Can it write better content than humans?...We'll soon find out.

So, let's settle this 2012 question once and for all: No, there is no web scraping, rewriting, paraphrasing, translating, spinning or any other cheap blackhat method of getting "unique" content in our system. It's UNIQUE because that's how GPT models work. The End

Well explained thank you.

I'm going to buy your software.

 

[Cognitive]

Well explained thank you.

I'm going to buy your software.

Thank you Let me know if you want the Autopilot Extended Free Trial first

 

[Hama]

Thank you Let me know if you want the Autopilot Extended Free Trial first

yes please I only want to test whether a autopilot long article works well if so then I buy it right away.

 

[dogukanseo]

AutoPilot Extended Free Trial

 

[ODDAK]

Can i have trial?

 

[Hama]

For people who want a comparison Sensit vs Jarvis.

I just bought Sensit and Jarvis BOSS pack and compared them. Well I have to say I am impressed with SENSIT, Cognitive you made a gangster tool bro niceee.

Here's an example of two small tests I ran with both software and you can see the outcome of Sensit sounds a lot more humane.

THIS ONE IS JARVIS

AND THIS ONE IS SENSIT

Then I used sensit's autopilot for the same subject. Well this shit is next level niceee... Guys I'm definitely not promoting this guy but his tool is gangster.

Jarvis charges $60 for 50,000 words while sensit is unlimited. that's a lot and then you get a bazooka (autopilot) ready for the army.

I give such a good review I hope cognitive takes this tool seriously and makes it even stronger. Good luck

 

[RealDaddy]

Autopilot Extended Free Trial

 

[india]

Assistant Free Unlimited Trial for 48 Hours