http://prntscr.com/9lje2g
By looking at the picture can you tell the exact spot where I was ranked on 23/12/2015?
I'm just saying the you need to improve the graph so we can actually see our exact previous rankings.
I can tell exactly as accurately as I can in the screen that you posted in your prior post:
http://prntscr.com/9l8774
Your prior screen that you were saying is good doesn't list the number either. In any case I can tell you are consistent in rankings, and your far enough from spot 1 that its largely mute. (IMHO).
I don't work for Scrapebox but Ive asked about this before. They nor likley the people in your screenshot build the graph from scratch. They both use a 3rd party component that they buy from somewhere that builds the graph and then rank tracker for example supplies the data to the graph etc...
For the current delphi compiler (which is what scrapebox is written in) there are limited graphs available, and because of the nature of rank tracking the graph must be inverted and used in the opposite manner as what most graphs are used in because 1 is on the top and not the bottom. Which futher complicates it.
So they have spent a lot of time testing to get the most optimal option. For a $20 plugin it does a great job of basic rank tracking. If I want to go pay 2 or 3 times that much per month, or more, to someone else, then I can possibly get a more custom solution that has a grid with numbers that let you cross reference to see your rank at a glance. But rank tracking to me is more along the lines of
Im so far away I don't care and I just need to improve
or
Im at or near number 1 so if I keep doing well Im in good shape.
Im not saying your doing it wrong to want details but I think its very important to remember that rank tracking is a very broad general idea not a specific metric. You can take 20 people with different browsers and get 20 different sets of SERPs. Also you toss in different ip addresses and it further shuffles things. In some sets of results your page might not even appear at all, and its placing can vary from high page one to page 3 for the same term based on ip and browser. I think most people assume that what they see is what everyone else sees, but the truth is that where your page can land for the same term is a very broad spread. Hence rank tracking is a general guideline of movement in a positive or negative direction but should never be assumed that that is what your customer/user will see.
I've noticed that the harvester doesn't seem to filter out domains when you use User's Blacklist locally on Remove/Filter -> Use User's Local Blacklist. I've got a bunch of honeypot and social media sites where I can't post with SER, and other junk like 12345678.r.msn.com that google/other SEs has been returning lately.
I guess I can only filter out if I put http:// and https:// before these.
I'm not really sure what should be the proper formatting for domains on the User's Black List.
the blacklist is actual domains that contain http:// etc... so it needs to be whatever you want filtered, its url match.
If you put
http://www.domain.com
and what shows up from google is
http://domain.com
its not going to match.
If you want partial matching just put all your blacklist in a text file and do remove/filter >> remove urls containing entries from - and select your text file and you will get it filtered with no need for http: etc... just put
domain.com
or even stuff like
12345678
in the text file.