Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm using decaptcher.com right now and so far i am having no problem with it except for the past few days when they changed their API.
 
i have question, i have fast internte connection in my room, but when i test proxy the many result is Falid Connection Timed out what's worng with that ?
 
the rand checker addon in v2 has problem. it shows a message "cannot write in the path....." and freeze. there is no bugreport created. so how can i attach the bug report? plz fix it.
 
i have question, i have fast internte connection in my room, but when i test proxy the many result is Falid Connection Timed out what's worng with that ?

The Failed Connection Timed Out is mainly on the proxy server end and has nothing to do with your own internet connection. Public proxies found by harvesting proxies (especially using the default SB provided sources) would have thousands of people using them at the same time. Moreover, public proxies are unreliable too with other problems such as suddenly become dead or transparent etc. So, harvested proxies from the default sources will always be of a lower quality.

You need to add your own sources gradually in the proxy harvester for finding somewhat more unique proxies. Check looplines videos on youtube on how to find more proxy sources.

But public proxies as a whole would always be a problem and connection timed out would be an issue with the best of them. You need to use "more" proxies for harvesting instead of worrying about some connection timed out or dead ones. In Scrapebox v2, you also have the option of using server proxies which is updated frequently and so, might be more consistent.
 
Hi guys, is there a way to slow down the harvesting. Like some time delay for 1 threaded harvesting? :).
If you are using V1 then you can do as noted above by THESEOWIZARD, else if you are using V2 just use the detailed harvester and there is a delay option in the lower left hand corner of the screen where you pick your engines.

the rand checker addon in v2 has problem. it shows a message "cannot write in the path....." and freeze. there is no bugreport created. so how can i attach the bug report? plz fix it.

It sounds like the rank tracker doesn't have write permissions. Make sure that the actual Scrapebox folder and the plugins >> rank tracker folders that are in that folder, have write permissions.

Make sure the entire scrapebox folder is either on your desktop or in your documents folder, and if its not there, move it to 1 of those locations.

Else inside that scrapebox >> plugins >> rank tracker folder - that is where the bug report should be, not in the main folder, so you can look there for the bugreport.txt file
 
As noted above proxies can pass a test but be blocked for the query you wind up using in rank tracker.

If you put it at 1 connection and 60 seconds and turn off proxies does it work? I mean its working fine for me on my machines, so its something local to your machine and that would lend it to being most likely proxy related somehow.

It also could be security software, such as anti-virus, malware checker, firewall etc... hijacking or blocking the requests so make sure the rank tracker is set as trusted/allowed in all security software.

I decreased the connections to 1 and now it gives some results. Once again you and SweetFunny are correct that it is related to proxies.

I'm pretty sure Google did something lately regarding their tolerance.

Anyway, thank you both.

Hi, not giving you blank now?
I don't use proxy.
Some results are not complete... meaning if it should check up to 200 results, then in some cases it can stop at 60 and in other at 20 and some finish the 200. Either way it is a matter of the combination of connections and proxies.
 
I reported this bug one month ago to support but it was ignored because support was not able to reproduce bug on your side (SB support told me that bug is because of my server).
So i reinstalled another server (dedicated), transfered SB and tested, gave support proof that this bug is still there on another dedi so its not problem with my hardware. I gave SB support print screens with CPU usage, and full access to one of my dedis - support is still telling me:
I tried several other engines on your machine and did not have this issue

Server:
Dual 6 core Xeon cpu (12 cores, 24 threads), 32 gig ram, 1gbps line, windows 2008r2. Please note - its beffy dedicated server capable for running 5-10 Xrumer/GSA installs.

Proxies:
Custom, port scanned.

Bug:
High cpu usage when harvesting with 1-2k (or more) urls per second. This bug is not visible in version .39, its visible in version .41 and .42

Proof:
Screenshots from version .42
http://imgur.com/a/LCgLa
Screenshots from version .39
http://imgur.com/a/9l7Z6


With version .39 im able to use 4 SB instances with 5% cpu usage.
With version .41/42 im able to run one SB instance with 100% cpu usage.

Possible problem:
If im not wrong SB support use for testing SB server proxies, this proxies are low quality and because of this its not possible for you (support) to see how SB act under heavy load.

Hope this bug can be fixed fast.
 
I decreased the connections to 1 and now it gives some results. Once again you and SweetFunny are correct that it is related to proxies.

I'm pretty sure Google did something lately regarding their tolerance.

Anyway, thank you both.


Some results are not complete... meaning if it should check up to 200 results, then in some cases it can stop at 60 and in other at 20 and some finish the 200. Either way it is a matter of the combination of connections and proxies.

Google may well have done something with the tolerance, for a long time they did nothing, but the past 12 months or so they have seemed to be regularly tweaking the tolerance to minimize the load they have. Nothing I wouldn't do if I owend google, but its an ever changing game, glad your working on the front end figuring it out. That lets you adjust course as they change.
 
I decreased the connections to 1 and now it gives some results. Once again you and SweetFunny are correct that it is related to proxies.

I'm pretty sure Google did something lately regarding their tolerance.

Anyway, thank you both.


Some results are not complete... meaning if it should check up to 200 results, then in some cases it can stop at 60 and in other at 20 and some finish the 200. Either way it is a matter of the combination of connections and proxies.
Meaning what you got is a combination of blank(s) and non-blank(s)?
 
I reported this bug one month ago to support but it was ignored because support was not able to reproduce bug on your side (SB support told me that bug is because of my server).
So i reinstalled another server (dedicated), transfered SB and tested, gave support proof that this bug is still there on another dedi so its not problem with my hardware. I gave SB support print screens with CPU usage, and full access to one of my dedis - support is still telling me:


Server:
Dual 6 core Xeon cpu (12 cores, 24 threads), 32 gig ram, 1gbps line, windows 2008r2. Please note - its beffy dedicated server capable for running 5-10 Xrumer/GSA installs.

Proxies:
Custom, port scanned.

Bug:
High cpu usage when harvesting with 1-2k (or more) urls per second. This bug is not visible in version .39, its visible in version .41 and .42

Proof:
Screenshots from version .42
http://imgur.com/a/LCgLa
Screenshots from version .39
http://imgur.com/a/9l7Z6


With version .39 im able to use 4 SB instances with 5% cpu usage.
With version .41/42 im able to run one SB instance with 100% cpu usage.

Possible problem:
If im not wrong SB support use for testing SB server proxies, this proxies are low quality and because of this its not possible for you (support) to see how SB act under heavy load.

Hope this bug can be fixed fast.

This was only happening with you and Bing, there has been a change in the next version which should stop this.
 
This was only happening with you and Bing
Did you see screenshots? You can clearly see there its not only bing.
 
Just a little query : SB support spintax that we all know but DOES IT SUPPORT NESTED SPINTAX ALSO??? If yes, would my following syntax work :

{{hello world {comment 1|comment 2} its me {commentA|commentB}|hi bro{commentA1|commentB1} its me{comment A2|comment B2}}

If the above syntax won't work, Pls help with the working syntax (for nested spintax)
 
Just a little query : SB support spintax that we all know but DOES IT SUPPORT NESTED SPINTAX ALSO??? If yes, would my following syntax work :

{{hello world {comment 1|comment 2} its me {commentA|commentB}|hi bro{commentA1|commentB1} its me{comment A2|comment B2}}

If the above syntax won't work, Pls help with the working syntax (for nested spintax)

It will work (except you forgot a closing bracket in your example).
Simply load it as a comment file and use the "Test Comments / Messages" button.
 
vanity name checker - how to make it multilple tasks ?
I set the connection to 50, but it still run with 1 task and delay like 15 secs
i see the defination setting, but how to use it ?
 
Is there an affiliate program for Scrapebox yet? If so what is the signup page?
 
vanity name checker - how to make it multilple tasks ?
I set the connection to 50, but it still run with 1 task and delay like 15 secs
i see the defination setting, but how to use it ?

Out of all the +20 Web 2.0 platforms in the Vanity Checker there is just one with a delay added which is Tumblr due to them blocking requests if you do too many. So i guess that's the platform you are using, but it's fully trainable just click the Definitions button and change the delay for Tumblr from 15 to 0 seconds.

Is there an affiliate program for Scrapebox yet? If so what is the signup page?

No there's not sorry, at $57 ScrapeBox is so cheap and one of the most value packed tools available anywhere so there's not much of a margin to payout affiliate commissions on top at that price.
 
Last edited:
Out of all the +20 Web 2.0 platforms in the Vanity Checker there is just one with a delay added which is Tumblr due to them blocking requests if you do too many. So i guess that's the platform you are using, but it's fully trainable just click the Definitions button and change the delay for Tumblr from 15 to 0 seconds.



No there's not sorry, at $57 ScrapeBox is so cheap and one of the most value packed tools available anywhere so there's not much of a margin to payout affiliate commissions on top at that price.

due, if i use the version 1. of scrapebox, 100 task is running like Usal Bolt :(
are you serious ?
Why some feature can't be as good as the old version my friend :(
 
due, if i use the version 1. of scrapebox, 100 task is running like Usal Bolt :(
are you serious ?
Why some feature can't be as good as the old version my friend :(

Tumblr has a delay because they block you for too many requests, turn the delay off yourself i just told you that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top