Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Does it ghost white or go all black?

Does it look normal and the window can be moved around but nothing happens/count does not change etc...?

Does it say not responding?

Which version are you using the 1.x or 2.x?



Props to you Tony, nice to see other people here with some sense. I for one is tired of seeing the complaints and posts flooding the thread, waste of BHW bandwidth, lol

Also how come I can't give you thanks, there is no thanks button under your post?

You are so right on ! I have seen a bunch of crabby whinny, complaining babies. Complaining about a SEO software that's easy worth 1000 bucks but is sold very cheap!!

I do not know really why but I can say that I have owned Scrapebox since 2009 or 2010 and sure sometimes there are bugs but I never have had any major problems. I now own two copies. Besides the license transfer wait time, I do not have any complaints.

Scrapebox is a amazing useful software. F the haters!

Loopline has spent countless hours training people with his videos etc... I have great respect for the genius creator of Scrapebox and Loopline for helping me out many times.
 
having known mat possibly 5 yrs maybe more
even though in that time we had 1 difference of opinion
i will con seed he should be payed for all the work he does here
and that aint me brown nosing just a statement of fact
 
I am posting this as a reminder to everyone in this (and every other BST):

As a customer, you have the right to post ONE review - even if you're refunded, that review can stand. You do NOT have the right to go into multiple posts in a tirade. That is called Hijacking a BST and will get you an infraction.

You feel you have a valid beef beyond what a simple review can provide? Take it to a Shitlist if you feel it's justified.

I have once again cleaned up the mess that was posted above...

OS
 
this will be a great tool..i would love to buy it later after I finish my website or blog :)
 
Sorry I wasn't specific. I meant in the link checker in Scrapebox 2.0. There is no detailed report like in the old checker, with the four columns: blog URL posted to, URL posted, keyword that was found, and status.
When I exported the report in 2.0, it only had two columns: the blog URL posted to, and status.

That's my routine after posting trcackbacks, I run the live link checker and generate a report.

On another note, I've had this problem with all post-1.16 versions, including 2.0. The trackback lists I gathered before 1.16 didn't work for posting in 1.16+. Maybe I'm not enabling some platform somewhere. Would you have a reason or solution to that?
Thanks!

When you say it doesn't work for posting, does it give an error or it won't let you click start or the success rate is different or? In 1.16.1 (if I recall my version numbers correctly) the trackback poster was completely changed. So that might be your issue.

just saw that myself today no thanks button , however none needed,
to quote a phrase my mom use to say

grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change
the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference

we all make mistakes, bad decisions , you just have to know when to
to draw a line under it and let it go, some thing are worth the effort some are not

mat also noticed this under my other post

thanks was there then for soft touch to thank then today its
gone from all my posts as i can see

Its back, I thanked you. But your mom was correct, sounds like a wise woman.

do you guys know how to scrape youtube video url in the page order?
i mean like i type the keyword in the search box on youtube, and show up the result from page 1 to page 20,
i want to scrape the video urls exactly the same as on youtube.

thank you in advance.

I mean you can scrape them with Scrapebox in the detailed harvester and it should be in the same order as they are in, in 2.0. I think the custom harvester just lumps them all in, but the detailed harvester keeps them in order.

You are so right on ! I have seen a bunch of crabby whinny, complaining babies. Complaining about a SEO software that's easy worth 1000 bucks but is sold very cheap!!

I do not know really why but I can say that I have owned Scrapebox since 2009 or 2010 and sure sometimes there are bugs but I never have had any major problems. I now own two copies. Besides the license transfer wait time, I do not have any complaints.

Scrapebox is a amazing useful software. F the haters!

Loopline has spent countless hours training people with his videos etc... I have great respect for the genius creator of Scrapebox and Loopline for helping me out many times.

Thanks for the kind words. :)

having known mat possibly 5 yrs maybe more
even though in that time we had 1 difference of opinion
i will con seed he should be payed for all the work he does here
and that aint me brown nosing just a statement of fact

Thanks mate! I agree, we had our difference, but that doesn't change that you are still a solid great person, if I were to meet you on the street I would still buy you a beer, or whatever you drink. Thanks though, I do get some benefit out of things, as a general rule, I get to beta test everything before anyone else, which is kind of fun. Plus they send me a referral for list sales when it fits, and I maintain all the faq sites I built and such and they link to it for the info but I get the affiliate stuff for proxies and servers and stuff off the sites I built and maintain. Anyway, Scrapebox gave me my big break that helped me to spring board into becoming full time IM and quitting my day job. To me that leaving the day job and being able to go full time IM is worth its weight in gold, Im super happy. :)

I am posting this as a reminder to everyone in this (and every other BST):

As a customer, you have the right to post ONE review - even if you're refunded, that review can stand. You do NOT have the right to go into multiple posts in a tirade. That is called Hijacking a BST and will get you an infraction.

You feel you have a valid beef beyond what a simple review can provide? Take it to a Shitlist if you feel it's justified.

I have once again cleaned up the mess that was posted above...

OS

Thanks for keeping our forum clean. I know its a lot of work to do, its the type of work where you have to go do a bunch of work and all of it just to bring the forum back to "normal" where it should have been (at least in this case). So thanks, we appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Scrapebox gave me my big break that helped me to spring board into becoming full time IM

did same for me in 2009, what i consider a minor break that i turned into
a major difference, but sometimes its those little things that push us to do more
and try harder....heres to 2015 and byeond
 
I was playing around with Link Extractor on SB2. Why is it that domain.com is counted as external link if the URL source is something.blog.domain.com?
 
I was playing around with Link Extractor on SB2. Why is it that domain.com is counted as external link if the URL source is something.blog.domain.com?

Please PM me a source url which would allow me to reproduce this issue. Just 1 url will do.
 
Hy.

Can any of you suggest a free english synonyms database that can be used in article scraper->article rewriter? I mean a bigger one then the default ones.

Thank you.
 
for uncompleted keywords...
how to use "export all not completed keywords" with sb v2?

This is a key feature and very much needed. Anyway to re-incorporate this into the new version? Without it there is no way of knowing if i'm scraping the same keywords over and over, or which ones I missed.

Honestly the harvester is almost useless without the ability to export all not completed keywords. This is a huge thing to not have put in there. Can you add an option at least for us to select to use that feature even if it makes the harvester work tremendously slower? I am willing to sacrifice speed for the ability to be able to export the keywords that weren't completed.
 
Last edited:
Google competition finder plugin is not working. It always returns "Error - 1"
 
Hy.

Can any of you suggest a free english synonyms database that can be used in article scraper->article rewriter? I mean a bigger one then the default ones.

Thank you.

What you can do is import articles containing spintax that have been created with any other rewriter, and the Article Scraper plugin can build your database from spintax articles by associating all words in spintax with the other words in the spintax. So if your article has

{car|vehicle|automobile}

When it's imported, each word from now on will have the other 2 words as synonyms in the database. So if you have a lot of high quality articles in spintax from somewhere, you can build the local database with them.

This is a key feature and very much needed. Anyway to re-incorporate this into the new version? Without it there is no way of knowing if i'm scraping the same keywords over and over, or which ones I missed.

Honestly the harvester is almost useless without the ability to export all not completed keywords. This is a huge thing to not have put in there. Can you add an option at least for us to select to use that feature even if it makes the harvester work tremendously slower? I am willing to sacrifice speed for the ability to be able to export the keywords that weren't completed.

I mentioned this 2 pages back:

"This sounds like a really trivial thing on the surface, but it's not.. A keyword isn't completed, or not completed there's numerous search engines which can all be harvesting at once. Engine 1 might be finished harvesting all keywords, Engine 2 might be up to keyword 50, Engine 3 might be up to keyword 600 and so on.

A user might be harvesting from 50 search engines at once with 500,000 keywords loaded, if the keyword list was duplicated 50 times for each engine in order to have a custom done/not done state for each engine your keyword list would be 25,000,000 records. So it can't remove keywords that have already been scraped and processed like you say, there's only 1 keyword memo on the GUI and there's multiple engines with each engine processing keywords at a different rate.

Then just to make things a bit more difficult, you can be harvesting at 200 connections. When you click abort lots of keywords across all engines will be half done, because there's between 10 and 100 search results pages depending on the search engine. So if a keyword is on the 3rd page of the search results when you click abort, it's not completed and it isn't not done same with the other 199 connections."

However.... In the next v2 beta, the Detailed Harvester has this feature. Any keyword that has not been done in all of the selected engines will be marked as "not done" and can be exported.

Google competition finder plugin is not working. It always returns "Error - 1"

Is this happening with v1 or v2 or both? With proxies or without proxies?
 
ScrapeBox v2.0.0.24 Beta is Released:

  • Fixed bug in PR check where ReCheck didn't work
  • Fixed bug in cloud storage, causing a crash when cloud storage was activated for the first time
  • Fixed a bug in harvester when "Add in front of relative links" was used in harvester engine settings
  • Fixed a bug in Grab/Check -> Grab meta info
  • Fixed wait dialog not minimized when main application was minimized
  • Fixed bug in authentication
  • Changed comment/message preview
  • Added "Favorite Automator Jobs" list to Automator menu
  • Added %currentdate%, %currenttime%, %currentos%, %newline% and %domain% tokens for comments and messages
  • Added Execute external program to automator
  • Added to Keyword section -> More "Remove containing/not containing" functions
  • Added export of not completed keywords to detailed harvester
  • Added auto save of grabbed emails in realtime to Grabbed Emails folder
  • Added to keyword section -> More "Reduce amount of keywords"
 
I mentioned this 2 pages back:

"This sounds like a really trivial thing on the surface, but it's not.. A keyword isn't completed, or not completed there's numerous search engines which can all be harvesting at once. Engine 1 might be finished harvesting all keywords, Engine 2 might be up to keyword 50, Engine 3 might be up to keyword 600 and so on.

A user might be harvesting from 50 search engines at once with 500,000 keywords loaded, if the keyword list was duplicated 50 times for each engine in order to have a custom done/not done state for each engine your keyword list would be 25,000,000 records. So it can't remove keywords that have already been scraped and processed like you say, there's only 1 keyword memo on the GUI and there's multiple engines with each engine processing keywords at a different rate.

Then just to make things a bit more difficult, you can be harvesting at 200 connections. When you click abort lots of keywords across all engines will be half done, because there's between 10 and 100 search results pages depending on the search engine. So if a keyword is on the 3rd page of the search results when you click abort, it's not completed and it isn't not done same with the other 199 connections."

However.... In the next v2 beta, the Detailed Harvester has this feature. Any keyword that has not been done in all of the selected engines will be marked as "not done" and can be exported.

Yes that makes sense.

Would you be able to add the feature to be enabled if only using one engine at a time? So say if I selected to only use google, or only use youtube, then when I hit stop or the list is finished I have the option to export unfinished keywords back into scrapebox?


If it's too difficult to code it for each unique engine to have it as a feature when only that 1 engine is being used. Could it at least be implemented for the google engine only to work like the old version does?

I only use one engine at a time when I harvest and i'm sure many others do too. It would be an amazing feature to have back again. If a keyword is on page 3 of 5 or so when someone hits stop, the keyword can just get marked as not completed since it didn't fully complete.


Would this be possible by the scrapebox team to add this to be used when 1 engine is selected as the harvester? Please!
 
Last edited:
#### Found all the options which are now inside the harvester in version 2. So, disregard this post as the issue has been resolved.


One suggestion though. I saw some new search engines in v 2.0. Please include duckduckgo in the final release if possible. Duckduckgo pulls the results from all major search engines and so, it should make the work a lot easier while scraping for any keyword.

Just to add one thing, The version 2.0 seems a lot lighter and is taking a lot lesser memory compared to v1. It seems to take less than 100MB ram for harvesting, scraping etc. which is amazing. The CPU usage also seems a lot lesser than v 1. I tried the proxy checker more and harvested and tested around 20K proxies right now. It worked fine. However, at the end of the proxy harvesting and testing phase, it did not show the classify sources button to check the quality of the proxy sources. That is a very useful feature as I saw in the video and would be quite handy to harvest proxy in one go and then filter out the bad sources once the harvesting and testing is completed. Is there anything that needs to be done after the proxy harvesting and testing in order to make the Classify Sources button to be active. It is just inactive in my case right now.
 
Last edited:
Hello I am Unable to Buy SB I Got this error http://prntscr.com/5t9fi9 I am Buying it from scrapebox.com/bhw

I am Not Using any VPN/proxy
I have Sufficient Funds On My PayPal Wallet
I have Tried it Multiple times In 3 days
Other buying products are working fine
I Also Cannot Send Money to SB via PayPal's " Send Money Tab " Because they need a Phone Verification Under My Name

Please Fix It And If It's Not a Fault Then Generate me an Invoice .
Pm Me for My PayPal ID
 
Last edited:
Yes that makes sense.

Would you be able to add the feature to be enabled if only using one engine at a time? So say if I selected to only use google, or only use youtube, then when I hit stop or the list is finished I have the option to export unfinished keywords back into scrapebox?


If it's too difficult to code it for each unique engine to have it as a feature when only that 1 engine is being used. Could it at least be implemented for the google engine only to work like the old version does?

I only use one engine at a time when I harvest and i'm sure many others do too. It would be an amazing feature to have back again. If a keyword is on page 3 of 5 or so when someone hits stop, the keyword can just get marked as not completed since it didn't fully complete.


Would this be possible by the scrapebox team to add this to be used when 1 engine is selected as the harvester? Please!

Scroll up 1 post, it was added in the .24 beta release right above your post. :) In the detailed harvester.



#### Found all the options which are now inside the harvester in version 2. So, disregard this post as the issue has been resolved.


One suggestion though. I saw some new search engines in v 2.0. Please include duckduckgo in the final release if possible. Duckduckgo pulls the results from all major search engines and so, it should make the work a lot easier while scraping for any keyword.

Just to add one thing, The version 2.0 seems a lot lighter and is taking a lot lesser memory compared to v1. It seems to take less than 100MB ram for harvesting, scraping etc. which is amazing. The CPU usage also seems a lot lesser than v 1. I tried the proxy checker more and harvested and tested around 20K proxies right now. It worked fine. However, at the end of the proxy harvesting and testing phase, it did not show the classify sources button to check the quality of the proxy sources. That is a very useful feature as I saw in the video and would be quite handy to harvest proxy in one go and then filter out the bad sources once the harvesting and testing is completed. Is there anything that needs to be done after the proxy harvesting and testing in order to make the Classify Sources button to be active. It is just inactive in my case right now.

I don't think duckduckgo is an option. I tried to add it at one point and I recall talking with Sweetfunny at a point on it. Duckduckgo either redirects internally, which makes it not possible to use with Scrapebox or it uses some fancy scripts that don't allow Scrapebox to either read it at all or read past the first page.

Unless of course that has changed, but if they are doing a good job at making their results not scrapeable, I don't see them chaning things to make it easier unless they need to inflate their numbers to generate funding, but thats about the only reason I could think. (which is unlikely at best).

Hello I am Unable to Buy SB I Got this error http://prntscr.com/5t9fi9 I am Buying it from scrapebox.com/bhw

I am Not Using any VPN/proxy
I have Sufficient Funds On My PayPal Wallet
I have Tried it Multiple times In 3 days
Other buying products are working fine
I Also Cannot Send Money to SB via PayPal's " Send Money Tab " Because they need a Phone Verification Under My Name

Please Fix It And If It's Not a Fault Then Generate me an Invoice .
Pm Me for My PayPal ID

It sounds like you need to contact paypal.

But the only way to pay is buy it via paypal/credit card - which also uses paypal as payment processor - or to send them the money direct.

If you can't do any of those then it won't work directly, but what you can do is to have a friend purchase Scrapebox for you and then it can be transferred into your name.
 
Last edited:
I tried the proxy checker more and harvested and tested around 20K proxies right now. It worked fine. However, at the end of the proxy harvesting and testing phase, it did not show the classify sources button to check the quality of the proxy sources. That is a very useful feature as I saw in the video and would be quite handy to harvest proxy in one go and then filter out the bad sources once the harvesting and testing is completed. Is there anything that needs to be done after the proxy harvesting and testing in order to make the Classify Sources button to be active. It is just inactive in my case right now.

When you harvest proxies, do you click after that the Apply button or just close the window?
 
Last edited:
Scroll up 1 post, it was added in the .24 beta release right above your post. :) In the detailed harvester.

Is there anyway to make the detailed harvester faster than 1 thread at a time? Or to operate as fast as the regular harvester?

If there is no way to increase the speed of the detailed harvester, then adding the feature to export all keywords only on that harvester is meaningless really. My post still stands and I really want to hear from one of the Scrapebox developers about implementing that feature in the regular harvester if only 1 engine is used at a time.

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top