Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[softtouch2009]

Thanks, the domain resolver now processes the full list. I found another bug though, if you load urls with "https://" into the domain resolver, it screws them up and just processes them as "https:"

I also have a url in a large list that's hanging the domain resolver, I'm trying to find out which it is but since it's a list of 1 million + domains it's not easy.

Thanks for reporting the https bug. Its fixed and now available in the V2.0.0.2 of the domain resolver addon.

 

[seo4life]

Before blaming the software, you should first look at what you did. Every time you complained about this BETA (!) version, it was always user error and not a problem of the software.
I suggest you stop using the BETA version of ScrapeBox, and instead use the 1.6.x version, because you are not anticipating in the public beta test, but instead keep on complaining on this forum and not helping anybody with that. You forgot that this is a beta test, for which you have not paid anything, and you are also not forced you to use the V2 beta. We have so many beta tester who properly report issues, AFTER making sure its not a user error, and their findings/issues have been resolved quickly. We wasted so much time in looking for bugs you reported which have been in the end just user error and not bugs. This delays the development dramatically and we cant do that any longer. So please go back to ScrapeBox V1.6.x.

ahh come on, that is just bad attitude.....
rank tracker still does not work. I choose keyword on the left, run the ranking in google, it spits out the results in right window and I see my site there.....for many keywords, ......many....it is in the list but it does not register it......
I see it at position 10 for example for specific keyword....and in rank tracker there is a blank dash and it should be position 10.....

 

[softtouch2009]

ahh come on, that is just bad attitude.....
rank tracker still does not work. I choose keyword on the left, run the ranking in google, it spits out the results in right window and I see my site there.....for many keywords, ......many....it is in the list but it does not register it......
I see it at position 10 for example for specific keyword....and in rank tracker there is a blank dash and it should be position 10.....

Pardon me? Bad attitude? We spent hour after hour with your "issues", only to figure out that they have all been user errors.
If you think the beta ranktracker does not work (for you), then provide us the project you use.

 

[needhelpwithdos]

Love the new version guys, kick-ass. Everything is great so far. Had only one issue where the bug-fix came up, and it was while using the malware/phish addon. It's awesome you guys did the public beta too, so we can get used to the new version. I'm sure it's frustrating for the devs but some of us are very grateful. Thanks to all you guys, it's appreciated for all it does at the cost. I've used it for years and still probably don't know half of what it does. The Article scraper definitely rocks too for all the wordpressCom etc. 2.0s and love the detailed harvester.

 

[prophecyprojekt]

I love Scrapebox!

 

[doomy]

Another "issue" I found with SB2.x:

SB1 is generally much better at parsing and importing only valid urls when you load/paste into the main URL list. For example this list in SB1 would only get the valid urls:

www.man.com
www.dog.com
asdhgshgd
www.yahoo.com
asogh aosghdoah sdg
www.google.com

It would get only the 4 valid sites, but SB2 will load all of the lines as urls, which obviously isn't correct. At this point I've been using SB1 to load/clean lists of URLs as it works pretty well at getting only the valid ones, but not so with 2.0

 

[softtouch2009]

Another "issue" I found with SB2.x:

SB1 is generally much better at parsing and importing only valid urls when you load/paste into the main URL list. For example this list in SB1 would only get the valid urls:

www.man.com
www.dog.com
asdhgshgd
www.yahoo.com
asogh aosghdoah sdg
www.google.com

It would get only the 4 valid sites, but SB2 will load all of the lines as urls, which obviously isn't correct. At this point I've been using SB1 to load/clean lists of URLs as it works pretty well at getting only the valid ones, but not so with 2.0

Will be available in the next beta release.

 

[Nagendrarao]

is it the ping function, will ping our comment that post via comment poster?

Hi can one tell me how would scrape box help us to do seo more effectively and also the benefits it could get us
thanks in advance

 

[adamex1970]

Yes, import on domain level as well as removing urls containing is not as efficient as in 1xx sb. I can confirm the bug with removing is fixed - still I would like to see a bigger efficiency - as we are able to work with bigger lists now on 64 bit, but when comparing small like around 1mln still the old sb wins.

 

[softtouch2009]

Yes, import on domain level as well as removing urls containing is not as efficient as in 1xx sb. I can confirm the bug with removing is fixed - still I would like to see a bigger efficiency - as we are able to work with bigger lists now on 64 bit, but when comparing small like around 1mln still the old sb wins.

We are working still on optimization. The implementation of import on domain level in the next beta release should be many times faster than in V1.
When testing with a 1 mio. randomly generated long urls list, it took only 2.3 seconds for V2, and 42 seconds for V1.

 

[KloudBucket]

is it possible to create contextual link using scrapebox?

 

[Seljo]

Found a bug, whenever I try the Domainlookup it crashes and It crashes with different errors. I sent the bug report already.

I have the latest SB2!

Still loving it

 

[needhelpwithdos]

is it possible to create contextual link using scrapebox?

You can put <a href> tags in your spun comments and it will post them just as you would, but you have to spin those too or they'll all be the same URL and anchor. So you would do

 {<a href="URL1">KEYWORD</a>|<a href="URL2">KEYWORD</a>}

so the keywords match the URL you're using.

Better yet, you can spin the html also inside the "URL" and the >KEYWORD/ANCHOR< also

 {<a href="URL1">{KEYWORD1|KEYWORD2|site.com|KEYWORD3|CLICK HERE}</a>|<a href="URL2">{KEYWORD|KEYWORD|KEYWORD}</a>}

depending on what you are doing you can get very creative and do nested spinning also inside any part of the tags. always TEST COMMENTS in the poster first to make sure they are correct.

 

[loopline]

We are working still on optimization. The implementation of import on domain level in the next beta release should be many times faster than in V1.
When testing with a 1 mio. randomly generated long urls list, it took only 2.3 seconds for V2, and 42 seconds for V1.

Thats a serious improvement, thanks!

is it possible to create contextual link using scrapebox?

In addition to what needhelpwithdos said, you can use the article scraper plugin to post to wordpress, tumblr and blogger/blogspot blogs and make in content links.

Also I have a video here that will help you out with that general concept of building higher quality links with SB.

http://youtu.be/jtUotlkVnas

 

[softtouch2009]

Yes, import on domain level as well as removing urls containing is not as efficient as in 1xx sb. I can confirm the bug with removing is fixed - still I would like to see a bigger efficiency - as we are able to work with bigger lists now on 64 bit, but when comparing small like around 1mln still the old sb wins.

After some optimization we made, the "Select the url list to compare..." is way faster than V1, about 10x-20x, and the "Remove urls containing..." is about twice as fast.
There is not much to optimize anymore. Just get a calculator and calculate how many possible compares need to be executed when you load 1mio. urls, and select another 1mio. urls for "Remove urls containing...".

 

[seo4life]

I have one sugestion for rank tracker.....
you cant edit the subpages option after you save the project, why is that?

 

[ID Internet Marketer]

does anyone know how to solve this ?

http://prntscr.com/5mwfx3

i want to make it approved automatically. it was slow commenter.

 

[monazky5050]

Hello,
Please if you are the owner of scrapebox, i have a license and i`m waiting about two days and the software didn`t activated yet
I hope you activate it in fast time because i need it
Thanks

 

[adamex1970]

After some optimization we made, the "Select the url list to compare..." is way faster than V1, about 10x-20x, and the "Remove urls containing..." is about twice as fast.
There is not much to optimize anymore. Just get a calculator and calculate how many possible compares need to be executed when you load 1mio. urls, and select another 1mio. urls for "Remove urls containing...".

Ok I updated to 2.0.0.21, but there is nothing for that in change log. I tested on a 0.3mln urls comparing it with the same file - so there was no url left. In 1.16.4 it took about 1 minute in 2.0.0.21 I have to kill sb after over half of an hour. I tried smaller and bigger lists - it's always slower. One thing that is much faster in 2.xx - it's the part of importing urls - as they appear in sb window - it's really fast now - but the processing itself is much slower. There are many combinations so I cannot made a single screencast for it - but one case that might be a solutions to it - when comparing on domain level a big 1mln urls list, all with the same domain it's been processed in version 2.xx almost immediately - version 1.0xx is taking as normally a few minutes - in all other cases 2xx is slower (maybe due to various domains?).

BTW. I noticed some other issue - I store some urls in a file without http and when they are mixed with those with http after importing in scrapebox I can see only those containing http.

 

[softtouch2009]

Ok I updated to 2.0.0.21, but there is nothing for that in change log. I tested on a 0.3mln urls comparing it with the same file - so there was no url left. In 1.16.4 it took about 1 minute in 2.0.0.21 I have to kill sb after over half of an hour. I tried smaller and bigger lists - it's always slower. One thing that is much faster in 2.xx - it's the part of importing urls - as they appear in sb window - it's really fast now - but the processing itself is much slower. There are many combinations so I cannot made a single screencast for it - but one case that might be a solutions to it - when comparing on domain level a big 1mln urls list, all with the same domain it's been processed in version 2.xx almost immediately - version 1.0xx is taking as normally a few minutes - in all other cases 2xx is slower (maybe due to various domains?).

BTW. I noticed some other issue - I store some urls in a file without http and when they are mixed with those with http after importing in scrapebox I can see only those containing http.

The .21 was released on December 24, of course changes from yesterday are not in that version. It will be in the next beta release.

Its normal that you will only see urls with http. Some user requested to filter out urls without http or https, so this was implemented already in the current available beta. I have a note about it, and might add a switch in the options menu to enable/disable the filter.