Run-on-Top
Junior Member
- May 18, 2009
- 104
- 28
Better! I dont know ultimate wordpress comment spammer, but scrapebox is really near unbeatable is his segment.
Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter Sweetfunny
- Start date
- Status
medway
Junior Member
- Mar 26, 2008
- 152
- 15
I'm having some issues with ping success when using harvested but tested proxies along with some other free ones.
I've got a batch of private ones that work ok but Im trying to pump up article views so the more the better.
Any reason why Im getting so many 403 and 404 etc.. errors?
If I use the proxies for PR checking they seem to work ok altho a little slow.
Is there some way to slow the pinging down to accomodate them? I dont need the ping to go quicky, id be happy to just let it slowly run for a while if it would help the success rate, plus it probably looks better on the article view logging end as well.
EDIT: hmm just deleted a couple of the top proxies in the list to test and now ive gotten a long string of success for once. prior to that id get a success and then a fail or two and the one success for every 3-4 fails... but just now ive got 20 success in a row so maybe its ok now ;-)
I've got a batch of private ones that work ok but Im trying to pump up article views so the more the better.
Any reason why Im getting so many 403 and 404 etc.. errors?
If I use the proxies for PR checking they seem to work ok altho a little slow.
Is there some way to slow the pinging down to accomodate them? I dont need the ping to go quicky, id be happy to just let it slowly run for a while if it would help the success rate, plus it probably looks better on the article view logging end as well.
EDIT: hmm just deleted a couple of the top proxies in the list to test and now ive gotten a long string of success for once. prior to that id get a success and then a fail or two and the one success for every 3-4 fails... but just now ive got 20 success in a row so maybe its ok now ;-)
Last edited:
erroronline14
Regular Member
- Oct 16, 2009
- 321
- 926
I just sent my payment.. Im so excited to try this one..
youngguy
BANNED
- Apr 11, 2009
- 1,051
- 1,574
Proxy Harvester seems still buggy Sweet,
1. When I harvest proxies, tested it and got a nice list, then I add working proxies to main list and it's not working. I test it again and all died!
2. After harvested proxies and proxies didn't work, I replace them with my private proxies list and hey! my private proxies are not working too. I have to close scrapebox and re-open it again.
Seems proxy harvester use so many threads and it flood all ports of my ethernet or something? Overflowed!
1. When I harvest proxies, tested it and got a nice list, then I add working proxies to main list and it's not working. I test it again and all died!
2. After harvested proxies and proxies didn't work, I replace them with my private proxies list and hey! my private proxies are not working too. I have to close scrapebox and re-open it again.
Seems proxy harvester use so many threads and it flood all ports of my ethernet or something? Overflowed!
1.7 started hang-upFew previous versions was fine. Usually hang-up when I try few times spin comments to check how they looks.
These are all issues from the internal spinner. Sbox spinnner is by far not capable to handle PAR multiple nested spun text for example:
{{Thanks|Thank you} for taking the {time|effort} to {discuss|talk about} this|{Great|Good|Hot} {post|posting|blog post|blog posting|message} and {good|great|nice} you {address|talk about} this|I was {reading|studying|checking} your {post|message|blog post|posting|blog posting}
this will cause text to be cut off in the comment preview. As was mentioned in the previous quote.
Moreover you click preview comment a few times and sbox will hang totally and you have to restart. I tried this before and its all from the spun text.. stick to simple one-nested sentences, like:
i {really|truly|very} {enjoy|like} them
My tip: if you have some heavily spun text, just tell your spinner to give you 30 versions of the result and paste these in your comment txt file so sbox will choose randomly from them..
peace
First you say your pc hangs when previewing spun comments, now you say it hangs when posting to MovType, so what is it then???
Restart your pc, use a comment file with no spinning, and click through comment preview as much as you like.. you will see it wont hang with regular comments at all..
Restart your pc, use a comment file with no spinning, and click through comment preview as much as you like.. you will see it wont hang with regular comments at all..
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
How did you come up with that spun syntax? It doesn't appear it was generated in PAR but rather by hand.
Ok a few comments about the spin syntax, ScrapeBox does up to 3 basic nested levels plus it handles multiple separate comments. This means you can generate "more" variations with ScrapeBox for a simple comment than you can do with PAR for an article.
Why not just do this?
PAR chokes in this also, there's an uneven number of brackets meaning something not closed off. Removing the very first { and both tools still choke and don't display it right.
With the spinner it will handle default PAR format, it will do 3 nested levels example:
Works perfectly in both tools:
Given that ScrapeBox can use multiple rotating separate comments, each with 3 nested levels of spin syntax in them it can already post an infinite amount of comment variations.. I don't think it needs anymore.
Kobalt2 if you are still having problems after removing spin syntax that's either invalid, or beyond the limitations of the tool please submit me a support email and i will get it sorted.
As i mentioned in the release notes, the Proxy Leecher is still "Beta" it was implemented at 5am and i went to bed and it's a long way from finished.
You don't have to use it, i just thought people would like to have a play around with a new feature sooner rather than later.
youngguy
BANNED
- Apr 11, 2009
- 1,051
- 1,574
haha Sweet! Yes I love that baby too. I must say ScrapeBox now is a BEAST in proxy scrape & check (Charon now is just a kid play comparing to this). It's the fastest tool to check proxies I've ever seen! Great man! The only problem is I have to save all checked proxies then quit scrapebox and start it again and it works perfect!
:You_Rock_
:You_Rock_
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
Thanks.
Can you tell me what OS you have, also what Firewall/AV and also what router? The problem your having isn't likely ScrapeBox, but a third party program that hooks in to your TCP stack is seeing so many outbound connections and it either a) can't handle them, or b) thinks it's some kind of attack and blocks the scrapebox.exe process.
When you shut down ScrapeBox and restart it, the block is lifted allowing connectivity again.
It may be as simple as disabling flood protection for scrapebox.exe in whatever program is doing it, or maybe i can improve something on my end to throttle ScrapeBox and make it slower.
"It pulls working proxies in to ScrapeBox, currently getting 764 working from 1,434 pulled."
I know this is still in beta. I tried using it and I usually get less than 10 working proxies out a thousand that it pulled. It pulls proxies in batches of 200. So what I do is pull 200 the first time and just add the next batches. I even reached 3000 proxies but only about 10 was good.
Any ideas on how to get more working proxies?
NOTE: I turned off my firewall and got 12 out of 200.
I know this is still in beta. I tried using it and I usually get less than 10 working proxies out a thousand that it pulled. It pulls proxies in batches of 200. So what I do is pull 200 the first time and just add the next batches. I even reached 3000 proxies but only about 10 was good.
Any ideas on how to get more working proxies?
NOTE: I turned off my firewall and got 12 out of 200.
Last edited:
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
It was pulling that many proxies before the ScrapeBox userbase started grabbing from the same sources.
When this feature got requested many pages back, i was dubious for this very reason and said many sources would be needed to make it viable.
You can:
* Upgrade to v1.7.1 which has a new source added
* Hunt for them manually exactly like you did before this was implemented
* Pay a few dollars and get solid Private Proxies
* Forward me "good" proxy sites to add to the tools sources to help me, and everyone out
I'd prefer the last option.
thefandango
Newbie
- Oct 18, 2008
- 21
- 1
Hi
Just wondering if anyone else is having this problem.
No matter what proxy I use, Google returns a 302 error. It continues, and scrapes the other three SE's fine every time.
The weird thing is I can use the same proxy to then query PageRank, so its just erroring on scraping.
been happening for a week or so now. Am using current verison of scrapebox.
Just wondering if anyone else is having this problem.
No matter what proxy I use, Google returns a 302 error. It continues, and scrapes the other three SE's fine every time.
The weird thing is I can use the same proxy to then query PageRank, so its just erroring on scraping.
been happening for a week or so now. Am using current verison of scrapebox.
oscarslater
Regular Member
- Mar 13, 2008
- 401
- 154
Hi Sweetfunny
I have version 1.2.4 and when I check for new version I am told 1.7.2 is available but that I have the latest version.
How can I upgrade?
oscar...
I have version 1.2.4 and when I check for new version I am told 1.7.2 is available but that I have the latest version.
How can I upgrade?
oscar...
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
302 Response means it's blocked from Google searches due to too many queries, it does a 302 redirect to the "Sorry automated queries" message. The fact you can scrape other engines, and do PR lookups confirms this.
You are on v1.2x?
Wow you are in for a surprise, in your welcome email there's a link where you can always download the latest version. So just download manually, since the updater changed and the version numbers reduced to 3 digits weeks ago to make it easier for everyone.
youngguy
BANNED
- Apr 11, 2009
- 1,051
- 1,574
I'm using Win 7 don't have any firewall (windows firewall by default and I add scrapebox.exe to allow list), eset AV, maybe because of my cheap router lol (Zycel). If this is just because of my router, just leave it like that, don't slow down the threads because I love its speed!
Can I have a question?
Does Scrapebox prevent cookies & session cookies? Just want to make sure I can't be tracked by cookies for scraping some sources
Can I have a question?
Does Scrapebox prevent cookies & session cookies? Just want to make sure I can't be tracked by cookies for scraping some sources
Last edited:
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,219
- 5,431
You can possibly add exclusions for ScrapeBox in your router so it doesn't drop it's packets for flooding, i'm not familiar with the Zycel router.. But i can look it up if you want.
It doesn't prevent cookies, because these are needed during operations.. However ScrapeBox trashes it's cookies from the session when you exit it. This wasn't always the case, so you may have some cookies from running older versions of ScrapeBox.
So if you delete your cookies manually now just to be sure, you will have nothing to worry about again they are auto managed and wiped.
- Status