- May 2, 2010
- 9,952
- 16,064
Just came across this article,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/
and it was published on the 8th may 2016
Now also ranking just 3 positions under for the same keyword is the same article,
just different pictures,
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...lped-save-the-world-from-hitler-a7020926.html
which has 19k shares, and was published the next day, on the 9th may 2016,
All they have done to acknowledge this copy is
which isn't even a link.
But both were written by the same author they say,
Is there much of this that goes on, with authority news sites?
I've not seen as good an example as this before.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/
and it was published on the 8th may 2016
Now also ranking just 3 positions under for the same keyword is the same article,
just different pictures,
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...lped-save-the-world-from-hitler-a7020926.html
which has 19k shares, and was published the next day, on the 9th may 2016,
All they have done to acknowledge this copy is
which isn't even a link.
But both were written by the same author they say,
Is there much of this that goes on, with authority news sites?
I've not seen as good an example as this before.