[METHOD Step-by-Step with CODE] My Twisted Method to $1k+ a week - NOOB friendly

wtf now will i get swarmed with those type of messages over and over again ? I got pissed off because of the people asking for videos who want everything on the table, if possible the OP should even work for them and just send them money on paypal lol.

And instead of just flaming me and getting offtopic you guys should implement this great method. Also it's not about "high horses" and I know better than others and shit like that, you just clearly haven't been here for a long time to know how methods get saturated in an instant and also immediatly after a great topic is written an ebook pops-up on digitalpoint. THAT'S what I HATE.

Chill down and let's make some coin.

wasn't intended at you mate was just a general observation tbh

Haha maybe I am missing something big here....

But wouldn't it be way better if the second link was the direct download instead of the real media fire page?

Can't you just right click on the real one and do copy link address and then use that one instead? (For your demo it would be http://download1448.mediafire.com/q1eleer19cmg/ycck9dp24jcape2/CPAS.rar).

Would that work? Then it would actually download it instead of redirecting to another page....because i think most people just get pissed off at the offer (they click once, they hit a content lock. They click again, redirected to another page.....at this point I think they are ticked lol).

Also I dont get why you have to split it....why dont you just make the entire picture link? I dont think they are going to click anywhere else anyway haha.

Just a few thoughts Im a noob so sorry if I am missing something obvious.

Perhaps I am a blind fool, but wouldn't it just be easier to full page iframe the mediafire page and just throw your content locker on that?

hellohellosharp said:

Haha maybe I am missing something big here....

But wouldn't it be way better if the second link was the direct download instead of the real media fire page?

Can't you just right click on the real one and do copy link address and then use that one instead? (For your demo it would be http://download1448.mediafire.com/q1eleer19cmg/ycck9dp24jcape2/CPAS.rar).

Would that work? Then it would actually download it instead of redirecting to another page....because i think most people just get pissed off at the offer (they click once, they hit a content lock. They click again, redirected to another page.....at this point I think they are ticked lol).

Also I dont get why you have to split it....why dont you just make the entire picture link? I dont think they are going to click anywhere else anyway haha.

Just a few thoughts Im a noob so sorry if I am missing something obvious.

Click to expand...

Hi,

I'm going to give you reasons for why I'm not happy about what you suggest,
BUT: I LIKE that you're thinking. This is what needs to be done, posts like this
should be read, and thought through, and then you will come up with other
twists and spins and create your very own, unique version.
So, no apologies for newbiness needed - valid thoughts are apprecaited,
regardless of whether they would work or wouldn't, it's the fact you're
thinking that counts

On to your suggestions:

The download links are created dynamically. That link to the download
which you posted, was created with your session ID on MF. If any of US
click on it, it takes us back to the page I linked to.

For the second suggestion, yes, you can use one full image and link the
whole thing. I threw up a second demo earlier in this thread to show what
it would like like - I didn't add the code as I couldn't be faffed, but might
add it in a while. It just "looks" rather poor, and, depending on your
host/server can take quite a bit longer to load. IMO it also looks kinda
weird, for your visitors, for the whole page to be clickable, but that's just
an opinion.

Here's a thought, for any one of you going to implement this:
Why not set up two pages, one sliced, on full-page image. Then, promote
both, equally, and run the split-test. I know many people would appreciate
hearing the results. I never DID split test this myself, because I found the
slicing rather easy and, imo, it looks better, but you DO find, sometimes,
that the absolute worst-looking things occasionally convert the best, so it
would be an interesting experiment.

davers said:

Perhaps I am a blind fool, but wouldn't it just be easier to full page iframe the mediafire page and just throw your content locker on that?

Click to expand...

Ooooohh, nothing to do with being blind, nor a fool. It definitely WOULD be
a lot easier. The problem is that MF busts out of iframes, so it won't work

Akkimik said:

Others can still see this correct link

Code:

http://www.mediafire.com/?ycck9dp24jcape2

Is there any way to hide that link? Because its easy to see that link when viewing the page source of the page with content lock.

Click to expand...

Yep,
Three quite easy ways:
a) Run it through a shortener, a cloaker, or w/e it is you use, or
b) Run your whole html page through an html obfuscator, or
c) Put so much other content on your page that the link, effectively, gets buried.

Folks, the key to this is your target market, and VOLUME.
The enormous majority, well over 85%, of internet users are NOT tech
savvy. Out of this 85%, around 25% "know" about the right-click function,
which, if you use a decent locker, should be disabled. Only around 5%
would then know how to use their menus to access the View Source.

Of course there ARE the other 15% of users, who are tech-savvy, but, let's
face it, they weren't going to complete your offers anyway, at least not
with genuine details, they would also know how to search on the net for
the direct link, and they are NOT the people you necessarily want to be
sending along to your advertiser's.

So, stick to the 85%, what "may" be lost via the View Source is going to be
negligible. Read up some stats on how many people jump online for their
first time ever, on a daily basis, and how many people are already online,
searching for stuff, and are of an age beyond the inquisitive minds of
teenagers and youngsters - THEY are your market

this doesnt need to be moved to vip at all. so stop whining.. not many will follow this through like alot of shit on here. there is no need to keep vip every damn thread. and im not saying that cos im not vip. its ridiculous people crying cos its not in vip yet..

Thought about this method while lying in bed this morning.

In order for people to saturate this less, they need to open their minds, you could do this method for linkbucks page which leads the people onto an untampered mediafire link..

Or do this method for facebook login page, or any major site login page. Which would be more blackhat, but imagine if you are into really blackhat stuff. Blast out emails, spoof the sender to be facebook, and in the message warn people that their account if being accessed unusually, and send them to a tampered facebook login page.

Obviously I didn't fully think that through as it could probably get you very sued, but if people want to spread out with this method, just use your head and see the endless opportunity this method offers.

cpaaddict said:

this doesnt need to be moved to vip at all. so stop whining.. not many will follow this through like alot of shit on here. there is no need to keep vip every damn thread. and im not saying that cos im not vip. its ridiculous people crying cos its not in vip yet..

Click to expand...

Very true indeed. Then i think this place would become

blackhat-vip-only-world-others-can-go-screw-themselves.com

lol .. why vip this ?)
this stuff is already shared on bhw since ages. it's just packed differently... i read about this stuff every day on this forum about content locker and email submits )

for those that can't understand the concept, maybe they should try to read more of the forum and fill up the blanks.

it took me 1 min to read the concept...i think i've only read 3 sentences to get the concept )

maybe because i've read about this over and over again here on the forum. so, as you can see, reading the forum helps you understand the concepts way easier

Hi there

Nice tut.One thing that immediately stands out for me though is that you MUST have a BIT of a bounce rate. The reason I say that is if people should happen to put their mouse over an area they are expecting to be able to interact with (facebook like button, home page banner link etc), and the mouse cursor does not change, I'm willing to bet they will will try a few more elements to see if there is any interactivity there. When they notice that the only interactve part of the page is the "download" link, that may frighten them into backing out of the page.

I imagine its only a small number, but hey, every penny counts right? The way I would get around this, would be just to use a html image map.Wouldn't take long. Just a thought. I may try this and get back to you.

redfan123 said:

Hi there

Nice tut.One thing that immediately stands out for me though is that you MUST have a BIT of a bounce rate. The reason I say that is if people should happen to put their mouse over an area they are expecting to be able to interact with (facebook like button, home page banner link etc), and the mouse cursor does not change, I'm willing to bet they will will try a few more elements to see if there is any interactivity there. When they notice that the only interactve part of the page is the "download" link, that may frighten them into backing out of the page.

I imagine its only a small number, but hey, every penny counts right? The way I would get around this, would be just to use a html image map.Wouldn't take long. Just a thought. I may try this and get back to you.

Click to expand...

The real beauty is in the link-swapping code, rather than how you present
the "fake" page which holds that code.
Nevertheless, different ideas on how to "present" that page should be tried
out, and split-tested.
I know what I do myself, and what works for me and what doesn't, but
even I'd be keen to hear all the other possible presentations, and split-testing
results.
If any of you do this, we don't need to know what you're locking, who
you're promoting to, or any of your urls. ALL that we'd need would be:

Page A: Sliced image - CTR = x%
Page B: Slices with replicated "animated" content (ads, etc) - CTR = y%
Page C: Full page Image - CTR = z%
Page D: Page with some extra html coding to more accurately present the
"faked" page - CTR = n%

Or any combination of the above, depending on what you create to do your
split-testing.
To achieve genuine, reliable results, you'd need to promote, equally, to the
same type of traffic, load the same offers in your lockers, and do equal
rotation, throughout the same periods of time (for those using dayparting).


I "might" do some split-testing myself, if I ever get the chance, although I did run some very small initial tests, and then just stuck to what was
working well for ME, which is the slicing.

Yeah, having time to actually do stuff is the real problem. It's nice code though!

JohnsonDaniel said:

The real beauty is in the link-swapping code, rather than how you present
the "fake" page which holds that code.
Nevertheless, different ideas on how to "present" that page should be tried
out, and split-tested.
I know what I do myself, and what works for me and what doesn't, but
even I'd be keen to hear all the other possible presentations, and split-testing
results.
If any of you do this, we don't need to know what you're locking, who
you're promoting to, or any of your urls. ALL that we'd need would be:

Page A: Sliced image - CTR = x%
Page B: Slices with replicated "animated" content (ads, etc) - CTR = y%
Page C: Full page Image - CTR = z%
Page D: Page with some extra html coding to more accurately present the
"faked" page - CTR = n%

Or any combination of the above, depending on what you create to do your
split-testing.
To achieve genuine, reliable results, you'd need to promote, equally, to the
same type of traffic, load the same offers in your lockers, and do equal
rotation, throughout the same periods of time (for those using dayparting).


I "might" do some split-testing myself, if I ever get the chance, although I did run some very small initial tests, and then just stuck to what was
working well for ME, which is the slicing.

Click to expand...

First of all let me thank you for the awesome method! The best share I've seen here lately.

I'm implementing it as we speak...as I do not own content lock pro licence, I am thinking of using custom script or Adscend media gateway.
Problem with AM gateway is that it clearly breaches their TOS, as I am linking the site to copyrighted material. Is it safe to use it or should I avoid it?

good stuff , I don't understand why some ppl don't understand how to use this ...

Good tut and well thought out method. Vip worthy

ruicosta said:

First of all let me thank you for the awesome method! The best share I've seen here lately.

I'm implementing it as we speak...as I do not own content lock pro licence, I am thinking of using custom script or Adscend media gateway.
Problem with AM gateway is that it clearly breaches their TOS, as I am linking the site to copyrighted material. Is it safe to use it or should I avoid it?

Click to expand...

The issue with using a gateway provided by a gateway network is that the
network is hosting the gateway and, therefore, they know exactly where
you are calling it from.

If you call it from a site which either hosts or links to content which
breaches their TOS, it's going to take them less than 2 seconds to find out
and ban you.

Do NOT, for a second, think that if you don't get a ban, it's because they
haven't found out. If there is no immediate ban, it's generally going to be
because they'll wait for you to generate the maximum amount of leads, and
save the banhammer until about 20 minutes before they are due to send
your payment, lol

Those comments apply to ANY sensible network, I am not in any way
implying that this is something Adscend may do but, if you breach their
TOS, why shouldn't they?

I would create a wordpress self hosted blog with posts about the download to get some seo going on here and get google traffic. Then link your post to your slice page. On forums link to slice page directly. Maybe people will bookmark your site and can read your posts for return customers.

Which cpa company has most email submits nowadays?

great method mate - I have already been thinking of a couple twists that would work nicely. Thanks given.

JohnsonDaniel said:

The issue with using a gateway provided by a gateway network is that the
network is hosting the gateway and, therefore, they know exactly where
you are calling it from.

If you call it from a site which either hosts or links to content which
breaches their TOS, it's going to take them less than 2 seconds to find out
and ban you.

Do NOT, for a second, think that if you don't get a ban, it's because they
haven't found out. If there is no immediate ban, it's generally going to be
because they'll wait for you to generate the maximum amount of leads, and
save the banhammer until about 20 minutes before they are due to send
your payment, lol

Those comments apply to ANY sensible network, I am not in any way
implying that this is something Adscend may do but, if you breach their
TOS, why shouldn't they?

Click to expand...

Thank you very much for a detailed explaination. I found a lock script, just need to figure out how to activate it on click, instead on page load.
First profit from this method is gonna be spent for Content Lock Pro

and donorship to BHW, a wonderful site full of good people