Its a typo right?
You mean inurl+intitle, not inurl+inurl ? I am just wondering because author wrote inurl+inurl and I thought it was a typo. But when somepne else posted it I thought maybe its part of the research along with inurl+intitle ... ?
Sorry about the error. It should be
Code:
intitle:"keyword" inurl"keyword"
or
Code:
inurl:"keyword" intitle:"keyword"
Yes that would be great. Like how actual strong are these top 10 links and what kind of methods do you need to beat them.
Also:
whats the deal with &990 thing:
it says 53000 results but when you do it and get only 74 pages its actually only 740 (74 pages *10 results) results???????? I am lost here? So where are the rest of those 53.000???
Google Only shows the first 1000 results (100 pages) it finds are most relevant, but on its data base it might have much more then the 1000 results it can show. The lower this figure is the lower the amount of websites google finds to be relevant for that keyword = it will be easier for you to come in and rank for the keyword.
Last question about last step and doing top10 results inspection:
Do you still put your keyword in quotes there? Because people searching for that keyword will most likely be NOT putting in quotes, so in order to see which the real top 10 competitors are you need to remove the quotes doing that last step?
When doing research of the first 10 or 20 showing results you don't put quotes.
Thanks
PS: that travis thing is basicly the same thing as market samurai?
Correct!