[Method] Get HQ content from EXPIRED Domains in Zero cost.

FA925 said:

So because you now own the domain, you own the content that was once on it?

Click to expand...

FA925 said:

anyone know the answer to this?

Click to expand...

SeoNews said:

i guess someone equipped with the legal knowledge could answer this, maybe @Coastline17

Click to expand...

FA925 said:

anyone know the answer to this?

Click to expand...

Coastline17 said:

<3


One does not own the content just because they own the domain. Explicit, preferably written, permission must be given by the author of the content to use the content for profit or transfer of ownership.

The fact that a user would be reselling this content, if I am to understand OP's method correctly, would implicate even more people in the distribution of what is essentially stolen content and lead to a myriad of issues if the author were to pursue legal action.

Mens rea or "intention" on whether or not OP was willingly distributing stolen content is irrelevant as explicit steps were taken to execute this at a large level; i.e. buying grammarly accounts and 40+ domains, ect..

To simplify, the Court wouldn't care whether or not, you were stealing other people's shit and the DA would get a hard-on for you as well as your new cell mate.

On a serious note: there are numerous other factors at play here such as jurisdiction and content in question. Article spinning adds another dynamic that would require more litigation than it's worth. Saving a few quick bucks here could cost tens of thousands and your precious time later down the line.

Oh and if you think that legal pursuance stops because the amount of money involved is nominal, you're wrong. Spending a fuckton of money to catch petty criminals looks good to the DA, justifies budget spending, and acts as a deterrent for other people considering the same

TLDR: Don't do bad thing, it bad.

Click to expand...

FA925 said:

Just what I figured, thanks.

Click to expand...

yorkaz said:

Wow! That's a really useful method! Thanks a lot, dude!

Click to expand...

astro2014 said:

Thanks for share this.

Click to expand...

Mia Jane said:

Will try this. Thanks for sharing mate.

Click to expand...

PHP-Rockstars said:

Thanks for the guide, mate! will try later

Click to expand...

nik2016 said:

good thing.will try it

Click to expand...

Turbo SEO said:

Good one

Click to expand...

anglikan said:

There are some sellers in this forum selling those wayback articles for 7usd.

They say ' i have a permission to a private database'

That private database is wayback machine lol!

Click to expand...

Coastline17 said:

<3


One does not own the content just because they own the domain. Explicit, preferably written, permission must be given by the author of the content to use the content for profit or transfer of ownership.

The fact that a user would be reselling this content, if I am to understand OP's method correctly, would implicate even more people in the distribution of what is essentially stolen content and lead to a myriad of issues if the author were to pursue legal action.

Mens rea or "intention" on whether or not OP was willingly distributing stolen content is irrelevant as explicit steps were taken to execute this at a large level; i.e. buying grammarly accounts and 40+ domains, ect..

To simplify, the Court wouldn't care whether or not, you were stealing other people's shit and the DA would get a hard-on for you as well as your new cell mate.

On a serious note: there are numerous other factors at play here such as jurisdiction and content in question. Article spinning adds another dynamic that would require more litigation than it's worth. Saving a few quick bucks here could cost tens of thousands and your precious time later down the line.

Oh and if you think that legal pursuance stops because the amount of money involved is nominal, you're wrong. Spending a fuckton of money to catch petty criminals looks good to the DA, justifies budget spending, and acts as a deterrent for other people considering the same

TLDR: Don't do bad thing, it bad.

Click to expand...

fc-dh said:

Dude do you haven understand that this is the blackhat SEO section of a blackhat site, I am just wondering...

Click to expand...