Massive Direct Scrapebox Blast on Brand New Website

takeachance said:

If you have a website which is somewhat matured you are already reducing the risk. There are a number of considerations to take into account in the current search climate the first being link graphs...

Google will have on record the link graph for your website. It uses this a sort of benchmark, if you have previously not accumilated many links you will want to change your graph slowly by adding a smaller number of links in the first week. Once many of these have been found (crawled/indexed - another story altogether) your websites link graph will begin to alter and therefore will be in a position to accept many more links in G's eyes without fear of penalty. As you start to build more links your graph shows a measured upward trend and you can then begin to pummel serious amounts of links because it appears natural (you are popular).

The second aspect is your content graph and how often your content is updated. The content graph is very much the same as your linking one in that G knows how frequently you update content. How would it seem to you to throw thousands of links at a website which has not been updated in months? unnatural? quite.

So, combine these two measures when considering building serious amounts of links to your website. Update the content a couple of times before building any links if your webiste has been left to its own devices for a while. Show G that there is activity going on (i.e. they index the new content) and slowly begin to build some good quality links over the next couple of weeks. Then it is time to turn up the power (improving your link graph - upwards) whilst at the same time adding regular content (content graph also trending upwards).

Following this ensures that your new found popularity is natural in appearance and you will find that rankings will begin to improve.

One final thing - remember to link to your new content (inner pages) as well as the home page. Make use of the great advice here around GWT and keywords as anchor text and before long G will accept the tsunami of links incoming to your ever so popular website!

Click to expand...

If all this was true, it would be a hell of an easy job to punish your competitor websites.

I do agree with linking to the inner pages though and have been doing that for a few weeks now. Each new page will rank better for different keywords, so it makes sense to promote them all individually.

thanks for sharing this info with us. quick question, i saw ur awats and it only showed around 30 visitors an average - i'm surprised that with all this efforts and hundred thousands of backlinks and top google ranking, that this would be all that's left for monetizing. also, u only made your 37$ back so far ? can you explain this further, am a bit confused ...thanks though for taking the time to answer all these questions!

arodgers10 said:

When you say link to inner pages as well as my homepage do you mean add the url's to the list of websites that I am going to blast?... I was too anxious to get going that I think I've pretty much messed up my aged domain. Is it unsafe to blast a new site that I want my income to come from?

Click to expand...

Yes - using SB for example you would simply gather a full list of all your website urls and appropriate anchor text and blast them. If you have G00gle Analytics then it is also worth looking at the key terms which have reached inner pages and add these to the SB link lock feature...

muchacho said:

If all this was true, it would be a hell of an easy job to punish your competitor websites.

Click to expand...

I do not make a habit out of talking from my arse - if I say something on here it is typically based upon my own research which encomasses fact.

Punishing comptitors can be achieved if they are very new. Website age and the age of the links pointing to the domain are the main weaknesses involved in bring down other websites. The likes of IBM would not be in this position given the age of the site, authority along with age, quality and authority of the backlinks.

weightlossgainsforfree.com (example) however which is just a few months old without many backlinks could easily be influenced downwards in the serps as a result of throwing loads of crap links at it.

All this aside, none of us truly know the answers since the rules are constantly changing (about 500 times a year), the best we can do is to test and test to see what works and what doesn't. It pays to keep sharp and agile to respond quickly and effectively.

arodgers10 said:

When you say link to inner pages as well as my homepage do you mean add the url's to the list of websites that I am going to blast?... I was too anxious to get going that I think I've pretty much messed up my aged domain. Is it unsafe to blast a new site that I want my income to come from?

Click to expand...

I'd use the SB 'link lock' feature so it'll randomly select one of my website's pages, randomly select one of the anchor texts I've added in the {} and use that for the comment.

This is more time efficient than doing individual blasts for each and every page on your site.

An example of the Link Lock would be:
domain.com {widgets|free widgets}
domain.com/redwidgets {red widgets|bright red widgets}
domain.com/greenwidgets {green widgets|greener widgets|dark green widgets}
etc...

If you mix something such as the Google Keyword Tool and Stat Counter you can find out new keywords that are bringing in visitors - if they get a decent local search volume per month, you can simply append the above .txt file

Interesting post. I have applied this to an old domain of mine. Its around 3 years old and was once very popular and PR3.. However I let it die around a year and a half ago. 3 weeks ago I rebuilt the script let a few old friends know it was up again and started blasting the site big time with scrapebox around a week later. It is a DDL site (Direct DownLoad) and we get around 2000 downloads submitted each day and I have been blasting the site around 5000 links per day for the last week or two. After I let the site die the PR went back to 0.. After only 3 weeks of the site being up again (using a new script) I have got it back up to PR2 as of last night

everyone is using the scrapebox software from scrapebox d o t c o m or there are others as well available? thanks

realf said:

everyone is using the scrapebox software from scrapebox d o t c o m or there are others as well available? thanks

Click to expand...

Why bro,if you haven't it,you miss very bid thing at SEO sector.Go to scrapebox.com/bhw and buy it at $57 only.
OP : Whats the condition of your website now boss ? Google randomly changes it result and whats its position ?

thanks, but it needs more investments: to buy private proxies and also to buy blogs lists... right?

maybe someone who already has it, can blast a message for me, and I pay for it?

I am a noob and very interested in this experiment. thanks much!

I've been doing consistent 'blasting' on an 8 year old .com and whilst the majority of keywords are moving up the rankings, I think Scrapebox can only get a site so far - a limit, if you like.

I assume, and I may be wrong here, that Google cap how much links can make to a ranking and if you don't cover the rest of the pie with things such as regular content, correct SEO etc, then unless there's little competition, the rest also needs to be done in moderation too.

So; I'm working on a 10 year old site which is also a .com, but I've added an auto blog as an extension to the site. SEO is sorted, the links to the domain and it's inner pages are consistently rising and I'm adding a new blog post every few days.

One thing I've not decided on yet and that's whether to add the blog posts in with each blast, or just stick to the pages I've been promoting since the start.

Suggestions welcome.

Hey Everyone,

I wanted to take a minute and introduce the next experiment I am going to implement. First I'll take a minute and recap on the last one.

RECAP

The first experiment I posted on here was based on the concept of taking a brand new website and blasting the shit out of it. Over the course of a couple of months, this brand new site firmly planted itself in the search rankings. Hundreds of thousands of links were blasted. A couple of things where learned in the process of running this experiment:

1) Link velocity is crucial. I firmly believe that the misconception that you can't blast a new site is from individuals who would blast once, see an uptick in traffic, then a swift visit to the sandbox. Sudden spikes that drop off, I believe, set something off in Google that flags the site. A consistent blast, i.e. maintaining velocity, will have you avoid this. I also believe that the more links you blast in a week, the longer the run up and down must be.

2) Content really is king. This is where the experiment was fairly limited. The site hit an upper ceiling. While maintaining this position for the amount of content on the site is awesome, I want to see if content+SB can really blow a site up.

3) It is possible to take off with a brand new site. This experiment firmly proves that. It's my opinion however that to have something to compare against, I need to test this out against an aged domain name, which is what get's me to my next experiment.

EXPERIMENT #2: Aged Domain + SB + Content = ???

In this experiment, I will be taking on a website that has been sitting there for about a year. Here are the stat's for the website:

• 22 Pages in Sitemap
• 2 Pages in YSE
• 143 back links in YSE, 233 in GWT
• Earnings average $.29 per day in Adsense with a 3.53 click-thru (This is for June 1st - July 19th)
• GWT reports 222 keywords associated with website
• 244 visitors over last 30 days for an average of 8.1 visitors a day.

For the experiment, I will be tackling a few things:

• I will be vastly expanding content through outsourcing
• I will be blasting using only SB
• I will be focused on revenue generation vs. purely back link count or rankings

My goals for this 2nd experiment are as follows, in order of importance:

• Increasing revenue. My goal is to go from $.29 to $29.00 a day
• Increase content on site 10 fold to 220 pages
• Increase associated keywords in GWT to 1,000
• Increase back links to a minimum of 30,000 in YSE and GWT
• All to be completed in 90 days

This will all be done while I still maintain a full consulting business. I'll average approx. 15 hours a week. I wanted to point this out for everyone who says they don't have time because of a job. I work 50+ hours just on my consulting business.

My next planned update for this experiment is around Friday, but I will of course stay active in this thread in the mean time. I'd love to hear feedback and maybe some idea's of additional things to track.

Questions and comments are always welcome!

Good plan bfellow.

Will you be blasting the new content as it's created?

Will you be using the Link Lock feature and simply adding the new content URLs as they are created; or will you be doing individual blasts for each individual URL in the site?

Some great advice and results here thanks OP

I've found that scrapebox blasts so work myself but many people claim they are less and less worthwhile nowadays.

I've been trying a mixture of AMR blasts and Senuke blasts with unique articles that are welll spun and readable and it has been working for me on new domains.

Also regular content is key and linking to that new content also.

awesome thread..rep.

hello guys, i did blast my new website with over 500k autoapprove blogs and get 300k success, will i get sandboxed?

ian_aztig23 said:

hello guys, i did blast my new website with over 500k autoapprove blogs and get 300k success, will i get sandboxed?

Click to expand...

You never know, probably not if you repeat after some days

on a scrapebox Blast, let's say which goes to 12000 different blog comments,
how many clicks would be on a bitly link / per day ?

thanks mikemeth, when i read this thread i stopped commenting, maybe will do it some other time again

Have you read this thread at all?

by the way its a 9 day old site, bought it July 13, i hope it won't get sand box, i really learn a lot here, +rep OP