dohologger
Regular Member
- May 16, 2015
- 208
- 49
Based on ACTUAL data sets from more than 80 websites. Hope this helps
It seems to be related more to content than links along with other micro factors. In general:
* Sites that had active link acquisition and low index bloat and had a tight index of performance pages saw an INCREASE in rankings and traffic.
* Sites that had no active link acquisition other than general background flux in random links / scrapers but had a large content pool where more than 50% of the index underperformed saw significant drops of 30% plus
* Sites that had active link acquisition with good domain metrics and a good portion of relevant links but large index bloat also saw drops of 20-30%+
* Sites that had no active link acquisition but had a good tight index of performing pages (less than 20% underperforming index) saw an INCREASE in rankings, as much as 25%
Factors where there was no real correlation:
*Any change in weight on site speed (think with google)
*Site age or establishment over time
*Brand trust/citation
Factors where there was SOME correlation:
Poor quality links
Negative Link Patterns i.e. Blogspot abuse
Massive skew between links at a root domain level and lower level pages
Anchor text profiles
It seems to be related more to content than links along with other micro factors. In general:
* Sites that had active link acquisition and low index bloat and had a tight index of performance pages saw an INCREASE in rankings and traffic.
* Sites that had no active link acquisition other than general background flux in random links / scrapers but had a large content pool where more than 50% of the index underperformed saw significant drops of 30% plus
* Sites that had active link acquisition with good domain metrics and a good portion of relevant links but large index bloat also saw drops of 20-30%+
* Sites that had no active link acquisition but had a good tight index of performing pages (less than 20% underperforming index) saw an INCREASE in rankings, as much as 25%
Factors where there was no real correlation:
*Any change in weight on site speed (think with google)
*Site age or establishment over time
*Brand trust/citation
Factors where there was SOME correlation:
Poor quality links
Negative Link Patterns i.e. Blogspot abuse
Massive skew between links at a root domain level and lower level pages
Anchor text profiles