@ggdentv
@saidtweets
@holiday.in.croatia
Interesting, specially because i don't use any bots at all, all engangment is genuine and not paid or from bot, follow/unfollow method was used in start more then year ago not anymore.
Holiday in Croatia (@holiday.in.croatia)
Followers: 8442
Following: 80
Posts: 263
ER: 56.25% — Amazing
Similar to previous audit. ER looks too good to be true.
Avg. likes/post: 4714 (Amazing)
Avg. comments/post: 31 (Amazing)
Avg. Video views/post: N\A (no videos to analyze)
Likes from followers/non-followers:
Followers — 8.5%
Non-followers — 91.5%
Very bad.
Comments from followers/non-followers/author:
Followers — 36.4%
Non-followers — 63.4%
Author — 0.2%
Very strange and obviously not good.
Time to check followers
Followers demographics
Gender (approximately):
60% — Female
40% — Male
Language:
English — 78.3%
Croatian — 8.2%
Russian — 4.1%
Portuguese — 3.1%
Italian — 3%
Followers Types by quality:
Massfollowers — 50.9%
Real people — 36.6%
Commercial — 10.4%
Suspicious — 2.1%
Same thing, the ratio between good and bad quality followers leans towards the bad ones a lot.
Followers types by Reach:
Low — 48%
Average — 23%
High — 18%
Poor
Followers by Country:
Croatia — 41.4%
Germany — 10.3%
Spain — 6.9%
UK — 6.8%
USA — 6.5%
Argentina — 3.4%
Followers by City:
Istanbul — 6.9%
Rovinj — 6.8%
Zagreb — 6.8%
City Beach — 3.4%
Rome — 3.3%
Starigrad-Paklenica, Zagrebačka — 3.2%
Esparraguera, Cataluna — 3.2%
Draguignan — 2%
Followers without profile photo — 4.6% (Good)
Followers with private profiles — 35.6% (High)
Conclusion:
ER is too high and by looking at the quality of the engagements it is obvious that more than 60% of it is from bots. It was very easy to spot, so if you are aiming to sell ads — be aware, not all advertisers will rely on the screenshots of Instagram Insights, but most of them will use third-party services to check your followers. I also spotted follow/unfollow but it’s very mild, so it should be ok. The content, bio and everything else looks good.
someone else uses them for you then, idkInteresting, specially because i don't use any bots at all, all engangment is genuine and not paid or from bot, follow/unfollow method was used in start more then year ago not anymore.
I don't do PM requests. BHW is an open community, so if you have any questions, ask them here. ThanksI've sent you a PM for my page.
Thanks
Dont think so, as my engagement issomeone else uses them for you then, idk
If you checked my profile you can see that posts get from 1k - 18k likes, depending how viral post gets, so i dont think that someone else would be spending money on my account to get fake engagement. Also all engangment is proportional to reach.someone else uses them for you then, idk
I am using Scanem(.)ioDont think so, as my engagement is
If you checked my profile you can see that posts get from 1k - 18k likes, depending how viral post gets, so i dont think that someone else would be spending money on my account to get fake engagement. Also all engangment is proportional to reach.
What software are you using for analyzing?
If you are interested i will send you Screenshots of posts and insights.
Also country/city analytics is off if i look official IG insights.
Likes from followers/non-followers:
Followers — 8.5%
Non-followers — 91.5%
Very bad. - why? As i stated up recently one post went viral with 18k likes, no bots, or other BS
you have PM with my last 12 posts insights.... average likes is 9-12% of reach...I am using Scanem(.)io
Regarding likes, it doesn't matter if some of your posts go viral, because Scanem uses median to exclude spikes such as viral posts.
But ok, since you are offering, I am interested in checking your screenshots as well. Send them to PM together with stats for the last few posts if you have them as well
thank you very muchSaid’s Tweet (@saidtweets)
Followers: 6821
Following: 866
Posts: 350
ER: 40.79% — Amazing
It's interesting. ER looks too good to be true. Let’s investigate further and see what’s up.
Avg. likes/post: 2731 (Amazing)
Avg. comments/post: 50 (Amazing)
Avg. Video views/post: N\A (no videos to analyze)
Likes from followers/non-followers:
Followers — 93.8%
Non-followers — 6.2%
The ratio is great
Comments from followers/non-followers/author:
Followers — 52%
Non-followers — 46.7%
Author — 1.3%
Considering the type of content, the ratio is ok but doesn’t align with 'likes' ratio which is a bit strange.
Time to check followers
Followers demographics
Gender:
79.5% — Female
20.5% — Male
Language:
English — 84.4%
French — 10.7%
Albanian — 5.1%
Italian — 1.6%
Follower types by Quality:
Real people — 43.4%
Massfollowers — 43%
Commercial — 12.5%
Suspicious — 1.2%
The ratio between good and bad quality followers leans towards the bad ones. 43% of real accounts give good growing potential though.
Follower types by Reach:
Low — 51%
Average — 31%
Low — 18%
Poor result. Most likely affected by Massfollowers.
Followers by Country:
France — 76.2%
Réunion — 5%
Senegal — 3%
Belgium — 2%
Switzerland — 2%
Democratic Republic of the Congo — 2%
Other — 9.9%
Followers by City (TOP 7):
Paris — 5%
Saint-Pierre — 3%
Toulouse — 3%
Cannes — 2%
Kinshasa — 2%
Le Havre — 2%
Draguignan — 2%
Followers without profile photo — 3.1% (Good)
Followers with private profiles — 41.6% (Too high)
Conclusion:
A few anomalies spotted during the audit. First, a very high ER. Second, a strange difference in ratio between 'Likes from followers' and 'Comments from followers'. Third, Followers by Reach is a bit odd considering the amount of real followers. Also, in 4 days between Jan 27 and Jan 31, the Following on this account increased almost twice, from 822 to 1441, then decreased back to 811 in the next 3 days. This is an obvious follow/unfollow method. Now back to the first and second anomalies: I assume this account purchases comments or participates in comment pods, but with likes the situation might be a bit different since most of them are from followers. Most likely likes were acquired from the same source as followers, or some amount of followers are just good quality bots managed by the same person. It's hard to tell exactly.
Despite great work on hiding fake engagements, the account is well managed and has some potential. Good luck!