1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

I heard that Google had a system to detect spun articles/blog comment/bookmarks/content

Discussion in 'Social Networking Sites' started by rdetempo, Mar 30, 2011.

  1. rdetempo

    rdetempo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    158
    -

    A few months ago, I read somewhere that Google had a complex system to detect spun articles/blog comment/bookmarks/content (with its big synonyms database etc).



    1. Do you know if it's true ?


    2. If it's wrong (what I really really hope), I would love to hear about you guys who have success with article marketing using spinners !


    The best would be that people how only used spun atricles for backlinks had very good results or not ?


    Thanks !


    -
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. master-of-backlinks

    master-of-backlinks Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    544
    Location:
    USA
    Home Page:
    There has been a huge Big G update, and it has affected many people. I believe this update is more for Quality of your backlinks, and less on quantity. I have always found spun articles to be very powerful backlinks.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. rdetempo

    rdetempo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    158
    Thank you Master-of-Backlinks ;) That sounds good

    Anyone else ?
     
  4. locknload

    locknload Newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yes, the backlinks from article sites are very good links, but you don't want to get too crazy with them. In my experience, once you get over 1-2k article sites, the rest don't have as good of page rank unless it is a great evergreen niche.

    Even then I wouldn't use that as your sole source of links. Google is getting smarter and it is better if you use a variety of types of links. Social Networking, and profile links are good to give you more variety. The most effective backlinks are .edu and .gov, they carry the most weight.

    There are plenty of people on this forum that you can buy them from pretty inexpensively and it will really give you a boost. Hope that helps.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. rdetempo

    rdetempo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    158
    That does help, thanks ;o)

    but isn't it risky to get backlinks from .edu and .gov ?

    I read on the forum that a lot of guys had issues with those kind of backlinks building,
    like almost immediat deletion of their account and even sandboxing :(
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2011
  6. schrute

    schrute Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    16


    I have friends that work at Google.

    Your best bet is to have fresh content. The worst Google will do to you is not display your site.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. BassTrackerBoats

    BassTrackerBoats Moderator Staff Member Moderator Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    12,806
    Likes Received:
    22,112
    Occupation:
    I don't actually have a job
    Location:
    It's an Algo, of course it can be gamed.
    Home Page:
    Here is a guy that is only using spun articles for his backlinking:

    I was doing some keyword research and come to find out that my KW is way more competitive than I was lead to believe in SeScout (22,000 local searches).

    Actual data from Google is 135,000 monthly local searches and 201,000 Global searches. Competition is 5,950,000 with "" and 6,170,000 without "".

    March 21st I was @ #37 in Google for the KW
    March 28th (yesterday) I was at #17 in Google for the KW.

    The only thing that I have used for this is Linkpushing.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. rdetempo

    rdetempo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    158
    Thanks for the time you spent to show me those great results :)