I discovered how algorithm work

Just because in your experience it didn't boost to suggested doesn't mean it doesn't work for other people. This whole THREAD is about external views and they are extremly helpful. Of course they don't have impressions DUH but they will trigger the algorithm regardless. Of course the external views source has to be a trusted website and not some indian type of website with no trust score. I had plent of videos do better on suggested and browse feature because they had external views in the first few hours. Stop spreading misinformation.
You remind me of my old viral video, external actually help gain a LARGE amount of suggested views but in exchange of freezing browse feature :) For me i hate suggested views, as you can see, i have nearly no impresison from browse feature but a large amount of suggested views. U can find my post here :D
So basically we are facing a lot of misinfomation that people give us to scare off newbie, and i'm a newbie too. I think i should use community tab to get initial boost :)
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/a...outube-video-to-get-in-the-algorithm.1394948/
1652750684679.png


are external views from Twitter and Facebook good?
No idea, they dont watch my video from twitter or facebook but reddit only
 
You remind me of my old viral video, external actually help gain a LARGE amount of suggested views but in exchange of freezing browse feature :) For me i hate suggested views, as you can see, i have nearly no impresison from browse feature but a large amount of suggested views. U can find my post here :D
So basically we are facing a lot of misinfomation that people give us to scare off newbie, and i'm a newbie too. I think i should use community tab to get initial boost :)
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/a...outube-video-to-get-in-the-algorithm.1394948/View attachment 210969


No idea, they dont watch my video from twitter or facebook but reddit only
Suggested views are actually terrible because they usually come with low CTR. Browse feature has usually a high CTR. That's my experience.
 
Hi @PaddyVu, may I know what your subscriber count is? Are you using just 1 channel with this? Thanks
 
Suggested views are actually terrible because they usually come with low CTR. Browse feature has usually a high CTR. That's my experience.
I remember the OP saying that external views should be used for a very short time for the organic views to take over because external views should only be used for the initial bound. Are suggested views not organic views??? Why should they now be feared ? Don't understand anymore...
 
I remember the OP saying that external views should be used for a very short time for the organic views to take over because external views should only be used for the initial bound. Are suggested views not organic views??? Why should they now be feared ? Don't understand anymore...
Browse Feature>Suggested
 
Suggested views are actually terrible because they usually come with low CTR. Browse feature has usually a high CTR. That's my experience.
Yep that's why i hate suggested views, they have like below 2% CTR, browse feature is god of all views
 
We are actually working on a Youtube CTR service at YTGeeks, but I wonder if it's CTR you need, or end-screen CTR (aka full video watch after CTR)? We can do both, but the 2nd thing would be more expensive for sure.
 
Yes CTR already best way for ranking over 1-2 years. Not new currently but most important think about organic ranking.
 
We are actually working on a Youtube CTR service at YTGeeks, but I wonder if it's CTR you need, or end-screen CTR (aka full video watch after CTR)? We can do both, but the 2nd thing would be more expensive for sure.
I think CTR views would hurt your video. Because lets say you make a CTR service with 80% CTR. It will definetly go down after your video gets suggested to organic views and YT algo will think your video performs bad. I actually think going from let's say 10% CTR to 15% CTR is better than having insanely high CTR from the start.
 
BTW, I've seen people say that changing a video's title over and over again is a risk that the algo views it as spam as much as, for instance, Kwd stuffing in the description. OP and the others what d'you think of that risk, in particular for a long term channel ?
 
BTW, I've seen people say that changing a video's title over and over again is a risk that the algo views it as spam as much as, for instance, Kwd stuffing in the description. OP and the others what d'you think of that risk, in particular for a long term channel ?
I dont think so, i change title like 10 times in 1 day in a single video, when you finaly found a good title, views will increase a lot from being dead => revived
2 days ago i mention i sacrificed a video by changing title to see how it affect other videos, changing it back wont help but you need a new title to revive it, and here's the result. Algorithm starts running again after 4 hours
1652858003910.png
 
Somehow i think if you turn off the monetization, views will gain faster, they have their right to put ads even on non-monetization video... just my fact
 
will segway a bit from the topic. Is there any chance no face in youtube will still be profitable?
 
will segway a bit from the topic. Is there any chance no face in youtube will still be profitable?
You mean faceless videos? Of course, you can do very good with faceless videos as long as the voice quality is good.
did see many movie shortcut with robotic voice , they garnering hundred of thousand views. Maybe they are a group exploiting copyright and they are making new channel everytime I view one.
 
Back
Top