Create WEB2.0 Structures Yourself - A Simple Method

">> Why does adding a video add value to the web 2.0 article?

It just does. Mix your articles up with images and video, looks more natural and the content is better."

partly because the bounce rate gets better, people stay on the site to watch the video, so the bounce rate lowers, and your url looks better to google because people have stayed on their longer.






I think Scritty provided plenty of information with clear advice as to the why's and why nots. I think he's probably got better things to do than repeat himself over and over and spoon feed everybody.

Take action and do something. You'll learn more that way. But I'll answer some of your questions and I've only read Scritty's first post:

>> How would google know what email address I'm using when I sign up for web 2.0's?

They don't know. It's the web 2.0 sites. They block signups using free email's. So use your domains email address to sign up.

>> Why would I delete it after 3 months, how would that help?
Because it will end up getting lots of spam and you only created the email address to sign up for the web 2.0 and don't need it once you're accepted.

>> When you do link out from a web 2.0 is it always via the last paragraph in a resource box type fashion?

It will vary per web 2.0

>> How do I know which web 2.0's allow you to put multiple posts? I've never even submitted a web 2.0 manually, I just hired them out, and they were single spun articles. So I'm pretty confused on this process.

Go to the web 2.0 sites and find out.

>> Why does adding a video add value to the web 2.0 article?

It just does. Mix your articles up with images and video, looks more natural and the content is better.

>> Add a link to a youtube video or is there actual click here watch a video in your article? How do you add the video, and how does it help?

Try this on Google 'add video to blog post'. See what it comes up with. Or find a video on Youtube and use the share button to find the embedded link. load this in your article and the youtube video will load.

>> why do you write an article about "some fictional person and the sort of dumb stuff they get up to?"

I think you'll find that was about the bio page on the web 2.0 site you sign up to.

>> Do you have a picture of what your marketing strategy or link pyramid looks like?

BSB posted his which is great.

>> I've never bookmarked before, should I hire out the process or do it myself? Is there service that could make me a bunch of accounts? I don't see how I could make 1000 accounts myself.

Try onlywire.com, ping.fm sure there's more. Or use Fiverr.

That's enough from me. Your other questions I either didn't know what you were asking or didn't know the answer. Good luck with you endevours.
 
The first time you do all this, it may take you well over an hour. However, I've got to the stage now where I am here in about 10 or 12 minutes, again, that's pretty competitive even when rated alongside automated Web 2.0 is creation and submission tools.

this is the point... :D
 
brilliant sharing, a great knowledge about web 2.0 sites and linking
 
Scritty, great thread and great read, thanks! Its now almost a year since your last comment (I think). Has anything changed with your process over that time given the shitload of G algo updates over the last couple of years?
 
nice step by step method. thanks. it takes mush time to create web2.0 blogs manually.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised that a 3 year old post is still valid after all the updates even if with a few changes
 
One of the best posts I read...you should see all my notes! How important is it that the web2.0's are on different platforms? I.e can I have a ring of only wordpress, blogspot and livejournal web2.0's?
 
One of the best posts I read...you should see all my notes! How important is it that the web2.0's are on different platforms? I.e can I have a ring of only wordpress, blogspot and livejournal web2.0's?

Each URL on your website only really benefits from one link from any IP. More are just a waste really.
For traffic - if you make a load of Tumblr posts and then promote them with another tier - sure - that's all good. Especially if you link to internal URL's on your site. Great. might even sqyeeze some link juice.

But for general success, you need links from different IP's no point getting hte same link over and over again.

Scritty
 
Each URL on your website only really benefits from one link from any IP. More are just a waste really.
For traffic - if you make a load of Tumblr posts and then promote them with another tier - sure - that's all good. Especially if you link to internal URL's on your site. Great. might even sqyeeze some link juice.

But for general success, you need links from different IP's no point getting hte same link over and over again.

Scritty
I always viewed it as each link on the same IP is worth half the value of the previous link. There has to be at least some value having two pages on a site linking to you versus just one.

That means you probably want to be as diverse as possible. But if one high quality platform is really easy to bot, it might be worth a tiny bit of extra time and effort to get another "half valued" link.

I don't know if that is right or not, but that is how I've always approached it.
 
I always viewed it as each link on the same IP is worth half the value of the previous link. There has to be at least some value having two pages on a site linking to you versus just one.

That means you probably want to be as diverse as possible. But if one high quality platform is really easy to bot, it might be worth a tiny bit of extra time and effort to get another "half valued" link.

I don't know if that is right or not, but that is how I've always approached it.

That's not a bad way to look at it, but remember the decline is recursive. 1/2.... then 1/4..... then 1/8th

Pretty soon it's a waste of time. It's more about where you link to . You can link from the same domain multipe times, just link to a different page on your own site. UP to a point (and no-one knows what that point is) Google treats each URL seperately.

Scritty
 
I've been using Web 2.0s creation for a long time. Is maintaining the Web 2.0s is a good thing like updating its blogs around 2-3 post per week. How about the linking to my money site is it ok to have link target my site every post/page that will be made?

Like this Web 2.0s

http://bumblebeesrusny.wordpress.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.weebly.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.blogspot.com/
http://bumblebeesrusinfo.wix.com/bumblebeesrus
http://bumblebeesrus.webs.com/
http://www.bumblebeesrus.sitew.org/#Home.A
http://bumblebeesrus.jimdo.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.blinkweb.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.webnode.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.jigsy.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.yolasite.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.bravesites.com/
http://bumblebeesrus.page.tl/
http://bumblebeesrus.angelfire.com/

I created it personally and make other pages and put contents on each properties. Is it ok to have links targeting my Money site on every page/post. I want your opinion on that.
 
I'm no expert but by putting your link on every page seems it would be a big footprint to google. If you were creating one of these sites (as an average Joe) you might link to a website you like 2-3 times but everypage seems to much. Just my 2 cents.
 
i didnt even read all of the original post because it was too damn long, so i know the actual process would tire you out! an easier method for creating web 2.0s is to use autofill magic instead.
 
i didnt even read all of the original post because it was too damn long, so i know the actual process would tire you out! an easier method for creating web 2.0s is to use autofill magic instead.

Nah, we are talking about quality manually created web 2.0 pages here, not some auto-spun crap. Manually created web 2.0 backlinks with unique articles always outdo the auto created ones in terms of link juice and longevity.
 
Back
Top