[Case Study] Why You Should Not Used AI Content Writers

This case study is also at question as all these AI tools use one engine as well. So whatever software is used to do the scanning whether the content is AI generated is using parameters that do or do not follow some of the AI generation principles. So, all in all, the study might not carry any weight in terms of reliability of data showed.

I mean it's all about prompts.

Had ChatGPT write me an article with a special prompt I crafted myself here are the results.

GPTZero: PASS - Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human
Open AI Detector: PASS - The classifier considers the text to be very unlikely AI-generated.
Writer: PASS - 92% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT
GPT-2 Output Detector: PASS - 70% real
Quetext (Free version): PASS - 10%

But who cares Google literally says they don't care how it is written as long as it is high quality.
https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content
"Our focus on the quality of content, rather than how content is produced, is a useful guide that has helped us deliver reliable, high-quality results to users for years."

They also care a lot about originality.

"Google's ranking systems aim to reward original, high-quality content that demonstrates qualities of what we call E-E-A-T: expertise, experience, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness."