[Case Study] Why You Should Not Used AI Content Writers

Vabrida1 · Feb 8, 2023

Which of the spun content software did you use I'm this article ?

joecal · Feb 9, 2023

I completely agree with it the study is sh*t.
BTW, I checked out Frase from the list, and the in many cases, it produces complete BS unreadable content.

india · Feb 11, 2023

All content must be proof read and must be edited to avoid any future penalty when millions of websites use AI content.

nSnoopy · Feb 11, 2023

I don't know where you got the screenshot from, but from my point of view it is not 100% correct.
I use an AI writter to help me writting articles then i manually proofread/fact-check them, and i get plagiarized content on quetext, maxium at 10% which is fair.

bbrokeaf · Feb 11, 2023

In my opinion, even if these tools can't detect gpt-3 content, you shouldn't use it as the main foundation of your content. Trust me I learned the hard way by investing $1k into an AI website to just get shitted on by google and bing after a few months. The thing is though, it makes sense because with AI content being your main foundation, you really have no edge or net value to the customer. For example, there was a website who did this very well called findanyanswer dot com, and they used to have millions of visits every month, but now their dead and gone.

HenryObi · Feb 11, 2023

kivi_nz said:
The test did not say how many articles have been tested against these detectors, as in my experiments, some articles can pass
these detectors, some cannot, you will find different articles written by the same AI tool have different testing results, without
the large scale of testing, you can not have a conclusion.

Your observation is right but it's actually not easy to run mutliple such experiments and case studies.

jerli · Feb 11, 2023

Meh, useless research with lack of actual research and methodology details

There's so many ways to customise tools like ChatGPT purely via text it's incredible how that research lacks understanding of internal flaws

And sadly there's no proper ways to detect AI generated content not just in long term but even in mid term

Sburator · Feb 11, 2023

In the meantime, Google...

(...) not all use of automation, including AI generation, is spam (...)

Is AI content against Google Search's guidelines?

Appropriate use of AI or automation is not against our guidelines. (...)

Should I use AI to generate content?

If you see AI as an essential way to help you produce content that is helpful and original, it might be useful to consider. If you see AI as an inexpensive, easy way to game search engine rankings, then no.

Google Search's guidance about AI-generated content

HenryObi · Feb 11, 2023

Sburator said:
If you see AI as an essential way to help you produce content that is helpful and original, it might be useful to consider. If you see AI as an inexpensive, easy way to game search engine rankings, then no.

There's no way AI would create a better content when compared to an expert in that field. The major reasons people use AI content generators is price(inexpensive) and the speed(saves time).

Sburator · Feb 11, 2023

HenryObi said:
There's no way AI would create a better content when compared to an expert in that field. The major reasons people use AI content generators is price(inexpensive) and the speed(saves time).

Personally, I use ChatGPT as a secretary, mainly for rephrasing stuff. I always proofread what I get and double-check facts, but I did that with human writers too.

But there is the lost art of knowing how to pose questions and ask for what you want. If you say: I want a 2500 words long article about SEO, you will get garbage, I am 100% sure.

raqm1 · Feb 14, 2023

can you try katteb.com then tell us with result

Mad10 · Feb 15, 2023

raqm1 said:
can you try katteb.com then tell us with result

Are you an affiliate of this paid tool, or the owner as you are asking others to pay and report back to you?

raqm1 · Feb 15, 2023

Mad10 said:
Are you an affiliate of this paid tool, or the owner as you are asking others to pay and report back to you?

not an affiliate and not owner
only need from @HenryObi evaluation tool

Slimeys · Feb 16, 2023

Any free ai tool you know of that could probably do a report assignment as i will manually change also , if anyone knows please get back to me would appreciate it alotlike would need to ask for something as the ai what are the goods commands that can answer the question as good as possible for me ? Do you know any useful ai tools that can do this
kindest regards

fixedincome · Feb 16, 2023

Indeed, this "study" is completely biased.
Besides, there are numerous ways to use these AI tools in such way the "output" articles comes out to be 99% GREEN.

Mactronn · Feb 18, 2023

LoL, what a BS! Jasper has the best affiliate commission around and that's why he promotes it...

leadgennow · Feb 18, 2023

Patrick111 said:
Stay Far Far Away!!!
I don't know about all of them. But a friend that's a developer in the field says that Chat GPT and others have a watermark agreement with Google.

It's not the kind of watermark you can see, it's deep in the code. But it automatically identifies it as A.I.

And IMHO Google will slap the crap out of A.I. websites at some point because people just generate the content and publish. The A.I.'s are notorious for using bad or incorrect data because they don't know if it's correct or not.

So, even if you fact checked yours and re-wrote it. SOOOOO many won't, that it will lead to a slap.

Recent big black eye for Google was when a site written in latin killed a very expensive local term based on keyword and lsi usage. Site has since been deindexed due to all the coverage in got in the seo world.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-algorithm-loopholes/278093/

01010010 · Feb 18, 2023

Good prompt-engineering with an algorithm to change output formatting would give 99% or more human rating to it on all these tools. My guess is that this is probably what Jasper and some other bit-hard-to-detect tools are doing.

Just see it yourself by altering punctuation here and there and the results would completely flip.

Mactronn · Feb 18, 2023

Patrick111 said:
Stay Far Far Away!!!
I don't know about all of them. But a friend that's a developer in the field says that Chat GPT and others have a watermark agreement with Google.

It's not the kind of watermark you can see, it's deep in the code. But it automatically identifies it as A.I.

And IMHO Google will slap the crap out of A.I. websites at some point because people just generate the content and publish. The A.I.'s are notorious for using bad or incorrect data because they don't know if it's correct or not.

So, even if you fact checked yours and re-wrote it. SOOOOO many won't, that it will lead to a slap.

Do you really believe that we will stop using new technologies? Nah! I'm "hacking" Google for 20 years and this lil watermark will not gonna stop me!

myloveishere · Feb 23, 2023

Great share about different AI Writers in Content Quality.

I have used ChatGPT for several days, it seems the content are not in high quality for its keywords seems not very professional or Expertise. and appeared lots of repeated keywords that beyond the density of 2%, which not suitable for Google Algorithm
Any help or suggestion?
Under this thread, So I need to change GPT to the first one?

[Case Study] Why You Should Not Used AI Content Writers

Newbie

Registered Member

Elite Member

Supreme Member

BANNED

Elite Member

Registered Member

Junior Member

Is AI content against Google Search's guidelines?​

Should I use AI to generate content?​

Elite Member

Junior Member

Junior Member

BANNED

Junior Member

Regular Member

Registered Member

Power Member

Junior Member

Junior Member

Power Member

Junior Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World

Is AI content against Google Search's guidelines?

Should I use AI to generate content?