Marco69
Elite Member
- Jan 30, 2022
- 4,077
- 680
My both domains on namecheap stelalr +stellar business plan have horrible slow loading times and ttfb global is 2 seconds (keycdn performance tool)
I wonder they must have bad configured and overcrowded servers.
On a test with google cloud vm 2cpu+2gb ram with cloudpanel I have ttfb: europe 300-315ms, germany 420ms (ok, it's not my main audience point) and usa 100-120ms I have blazingcdn on it, but it not looks like the cdn will lower more these ttfb scores. But they looks ok so, way way faster than namecheap hosting, not possible to get these ttfb scores with namecheap hosting.
Today I will try some ngingx settings see if I can get a little bit more razor edge speed.
But I'm very sad on namecheap hosting, in the past 2-4 years they were better, today not worth spend the money on webhosting, no matter if their hosting has dedicated ip or not, the hosting servers are crap.
I will change webhosting, I think I will hold on this one google cloud vm and for the other domain I will choose rocket.net or speedypage hosting.
I'm tired of bad configured and overcrowded webhosting servers.
My experience so far: on bad configured webhosting servers, Litespeed cache +cloudflare makes things way more worse not better, no matter how often the other side's spreading their lies over the web, how fast Litespeed or Cloudflare is, there are way better premium cdn out there in the web space. When you want beat nginx servers with a Litespeed server it's not possible, only when you buy a Litespeed server plan and set it up on your vps only then maybe.
Another one; hey not laugh guys, when you setup the cheapest Interserver plan with their outdated looking panel, you will be shocked how fast your wordpress site will load with them and you will get ttfb like 70-120ms usa, europe 200-280ms , yep that's not a joke, without using Litespeed cache or a cdn or with hostgnome (a lot of guys here recommend it)
What can Interserver, rocket.net, speedypage, google cloud vm, Hostgnome can do better than namecheap? I think the namecheap team are not server experts, have bad configured and overcrowded servers, it would be helpful for us when there would be free tools to check if a webhosting has bad configured and overcrowded servers, hence checking how fast the Home page of a webhosting company loads is a bad indicator, they all have well setup dedicated servers. You will know this after you bought a plan, a never ending ripoff industry it is today.
Happy Friday !
I wonder they must have bad configured and overcrowded servers.
On a test with google cloud vm 2cpu+2gb ram with cloudpanel I have ttfb: europe 300-315ms, germany 420ms (ok, it's not my main audience point) and usa 100-120ms I have blazingcdn on it, but it not looks like the cdn will lower more these ttfb scores. But they looks ok so, way way faster than namecheap hosting, not possible to get these ttfb scores with namecheap hosting.
Today I will try some ngingx settings see if I can get a little bit more razor edge speed.
But I'm very sad on namecheap hosting, in the past 2-4 years they were better, today not worth spend the money on webhosting, no matter if their hosting has dedicated ip or not, the hosting servers are crap.
I will change webhosting, I think I will hold on this one google cloud vm and for the other domain I will choose rocket.net or speedypage hosting.
I'm tired of bad configured and overcrowded webhosting servers.
My experience so far: on bad configured webhosting servers, Litespeed cache +cloudflare makes things way more worse not better, no matter how often the other side's spreading their lies over the web, how fast Litespeed or Cloudflare is, there are way better premium cdn out there in the web space. When you want beat nginx servers with a Litespeed server it's not possible, only when you buy a Litespeed server plan and set it up on your vps only then maybe.
Another one; hey not laugh guys, when you setup the cheapest Interserver plan with their outdated looking panel, you will be shocked how fast your wordpress site will load with them and you will get ttfb like 70-120ms usa, europe 200-280ms , yep that's not a joke, without using Litespeed cache or a cdn or with hostgnome (a lot of guys here recommend it)
What can Interserver, rocket.net, speedypage, google cloud vm, Hostgnome can do better than namecheap? I think the namecheap team are not server experts, have bad configured and overcrowded servers, it would be helpful for us when there would be free tools to check if a webhosting has bad configured and overcrowded servers, hence checking how fast the Home page of a webhosting company loads is a bad indicator, they all have well setup dedicated servers. You will know this after you bought a plan, a never ending ripoff industry it is today.
Happy Friday !