terrycody
Elite Member
- Sep 29, 2012
- 6,422
- 3,329
Fxxk this is sad I am going to do the same, now should give up?
Best AI rewriting tool
- Thread starter Guybrushthepirate
- Start date
Fxxk this is sad I am going to do the same, now should give up?
Guybrushthepirate
Regular Member
- Dec 23, 2015
- 281
- 169
Not necessarily. What didn't work for me, may work for you. That "manual twist" is the golden ingredient there and it is different for each of us.
terrycody
Elite Member
- Sep 29, 2012
- 6,422
- 3,329
But in my opinion, you already did the best: multiple article sources, manually edit, I can't think of more cautious steps. I would end up in the same result as yours.
Guybrushthepirate
Regular Member
- Dec 23, 2015
- 281
- 169
Probably the niche is important as well. Mine is a generic info site, not specialized in any particular niche.
terrycody
Elite Member
- Sep 29, 2012
- 6,422
- 3,329
I guess its just Google can detect Quillbot now.
Scadush
BANNED
- Feb 22, 2016
- 97
- 56
I agree. Rytr also has a great review writer that is completely natural which is something others don't have.I've not tried Jasper extensively (only for a few days when it first got released and only because there was a free / cheap trial) but it gets a lot of good recommendations, so I'm assuming that it's the best AI writing assistant on the market, even though I do have a soft spot for Rytr.
However, Jasper is not a rewriting tool, per se, which is why I'm going to vote for Jasper as the best AI writing assistant (even though it might still have rewriting capabilities), but I will choose SpinRewriter as the true, best rewriting tool (or content spinner if you want to call it like this, it's the same).
And yes, I did try SR extensively in the past for several months and it's the simplest, most powerful spinner on the market in my opinion. The trick is that you have to "train" it, so-to-speak, in order for it to rewrite / spin your content into a quality article while still retaining high uniqueness. And this "training" bothers most of the people, including myself
But yeah, I think Jasper and SpinRewriter are the best in their respective categories (Jasper for creating content out of thin air, and SpinRewriter for rewriting existing content)
EDIT: no, I never used Quilbot so I can't speak for, or against it, and it might actually be better than SR, but I gave my opinion on what I know / have used only, so take my opinion with a grain of salt
mastercheef85
Newbie
- Aug 29, 2021
- 17
- 9
What about creaitor.ai?
Johnpeterburs
Power Member
- Apr 25, 2021
- 660
- 181
Though it's tricky I would like to vote for Jasper as the dominant leader.
europemaverick
Regular Member
- Mar 1, 2018
- 253
- 108
Jasper is the best from all the mentioned options. Some of them aren't even close to usable but won't name them here.
Quilbot works ok for paragraph rewrites, but like all AI tools you still have tweak the final output to ensure the sentences flow/make sense and avoid plagiarism. Havent had great success with Jasper, Spin rewriter, Frase or Rytr previously. Market is wide open for a leading paraphraser IMO.
- Jan 22, 2011
- 3,691
- 784
I choose Jasper as it has more templates ( more than 50) to improvise your content not just by replacing the words but also by simplifying, expanding, summarizing and improving the content.
Cons of jasper – it is payable.
Some Other decent article rewriters are AI article spinner, spin bot, small seo tools
Cons of jasper – it is payable.
Some Other decent article rewriters are AI article spinner, spin bot, small seo tools
rahuldhawan
Junior Member
- Jul 8, 2022
- 132
- 31
You can use Quillbot for it.
- Feb 19, 2021
- 388
- 52
I've been using Quillbot for the last 1 month. The interface is quite simple, easy to use. but I can't say that I got exactly what I wanted 100% successful. As someone who is particularly obsessed, I did not like the fact that it found mistakes in the grammar checker, had it corrected again and again.
Jasper was suggested the most in the comments, I will try it.
Jasper was suggested the most in the comments, I will try it.
