funkybunker
Supreme Member
- May 14, 2013
- 1,264
- 1,812
As long as War creates more income than Peace & World Leaders continue to make everyone else fight over their disagreements, we will have war.
Exactly!Thankful?Be thankful that you have the freedom to spew the anti-military crap that you do.That 's just another part of propaganda you are accustomed to.
War is justified in pure defence. If and only if an army invades your country, it is justified to fight them out.
Justified in this context is similar to "politically correct" - has no value in practice.
I don't understand what you mean. It is the non-aggression principle. If you try to hit me, I will defend. How else am I going to stop you from hitting me? Bad breath?![]()
I was thinking a bit deeper/broader. War is not like a 2 people fight. It is not the fight of those fighting but of those ruling. Yeah in the end it comes to defending yourself. But war is not about the killing and is not won because of the killing and fighting. Especially these days. In my country, hundreds of years ago, when enemies attacked, my ancestors poisoned all wells and burned all fields so the enemy was left with nothing for his win. They'd win, but they'd win "fuck all".
While I certainly support your right to hold your beliefs, I do believe that they are misinformed. If you want to know about the reasons and purposes of war, I would suggest that your read "The Prince" by Nicolo Machiavelli, and "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu. If you want to know more about the beginnings of war, and racism, and many other thing, I would suggest that you investigate the simple fact that long ago war was over resource for ones group and self. This has not change even today.
Yeah I know. But that's not the bottom reason. Bottom reason is fear. Fear of not having what to eat, of being hurt, of boogie man (terrorists), etc. Those who rule know masses respond well to fear and can be programmed through it. Take a person you never met before, put fear into him about whatever and he will allow himself to be programmed by you and he will accept what you say without a need to verify. If you don't believe it test it on your friends. Spend one month programming fear into them and you will see after that month they will behave like they always thought that way. It's so natural it's amazing. If you want a simple form of programming through fear think how you train an animal. Even a wild lion at a circus. Or in the case of humans, a parent telling his kid he's good for nothing and "can't do that", "you'll never going to do that", "that's not for you", etc. Or a boyfriend making his woman feel like she has ugly breasts or body. I had this friend (girl) she had small boobs. She'd acknowledge it and accept that's how it is. Then she met a guy. This guy loved her breasts. Touched them different then her previous boyfriends, told her they're beautiful, etc. This was the first guy ever to trully make her feel like a woman (her words). In one year her breasts grew bigger. Like they do when a woman gets pregnant. Think as a young guy a woman tells you in bed that your dick is small. How would that affect you if you're not very secure on yourself? That's what programming can do.
It is also something specific to non-evolved beings because if they'd be evolved they'd see it for what it is - bullshit. And I do not blame the rulers. They're just smarter thank the "sheep". The "sheep" get what they deserve for being "sheep". They have the rulers they have - weak and corrupted - because of the same reason. Things will only change when humanity as a whole will evolve enough. Not sooner. Until then, they will follow whatever the shepherds tell them to do no matter how dumb or bad it is.
Edit - added more on programming.
And when they ask you, dad, what would you do? Would you say that you couldn't do 12 months for them, 50 years earlier? What will they think of you?
You do realise he did not say he wanted to skip fighting when those savage Canadian invade Brazil, right?
There 's a difference when fighting against an aggressor and when slaving away in times of peace.
You can't just go ahead and pick up a rifle out of the blue and tare shit up when aggressors finally come.
'Slaving away' in times of peace means leading by example.
What do 12 months of a lifetime mean when you set an example. An example that may save a future generation of a lifetime of misery.
If you can't stomach 12 months of duty in peacetime, don't expect anyone to fight for you when shit hits the time.
When you dodge draft because you don't feel like it, don't expect your kids to do things when they don't feel like it.
You want professionals to fight your wars? This means high pays, which means more money to be allocated to military. Say hello to the military industrial complex. Which is we didn't want to fight for from the beginning.Which is why you pay professionals. The role of the rest are for cannon fodder anyway.
You are not state owned just because law requires you to do something. With that logic any and all laws make you a slave. Even life itself makes you a slave.No, it means "slaving away". It means that you do not own your self, but the state owns you.
The world becomes better when it becomes rich? For wealth to exist, poverty has to as well. We all can't be rich or 'rich' wouldn't even exist.If you want to save a generation of a lifetime of misery, you produce. You become rich. That 's how the world gets better. You don't become a slave.
See above, you can't expect a highly paid professional army to stay 100% true to the cause of self-defense. An expensive army needs justification, which means it needs to be good at fighting wars, which means it needs wars to even exist.Of course I do, just like I expect people to grow tomatoes. I don't like growing tomatoes. Others do and are happy to get paid for that (and I happy to pay for the tomatoes).
Well, if you don't expect your kids to do things they don't like that's your prerogative.I never expect my kids to do things they do not like. I do not own my kids, they are not my slaves.
You want professionals to fight your wars?
This means high pays, which means more money to be allocated to military. Say hello to the military industrial complex. Which is we didn't want to fight for from the beginning.
You are not state owned just because law requires you to do something. With that logic any and all laws make you a slave.
The world becomes better when it becomes rich? For wealth to exist, poverty has to as well. We all can't be rich or 'rich' wouldn't even exist.
As we can't expect an expensive professional army to not fight for money we only have draft left to fight for self-defense.
See above, you can't expect a highly paid professional army to stay 100% true to the cause of self-defense.
An expensive army needs justification, which means it needs to be good at fighting wars, which means it needs wars to even exist.
A relatively cheap draft based army for self defense only is easily justifiable and doesn't need to rely on money for fabricated wars.
Well, if you don't expect your kids to do things they don't like that's your prerogative.
No, I want professionals to take care of my security, just like I want professional doctors to take care of my health. I do not wish to wage any wars, thank you very much.
I 'll pay high prices to a doctor instead of lower prices to an amateur every time. If you do not want the military industrial complex, all you have to do is reduce government.
The plantation slaves were owned legally by the slave masters. If you force me to work for you, I am your slave, it 's totally obvious.
There will always be comparative poverty and that 's great because it gives people motive to produce more. There is no comparison between a poor person today and a poor person 200 years ago. The reason is the huge difference in total production. The only way to make humanity go forward is by increasing production. And you increase your production by providing value. Provision of value gets you rich.
Sure we can. A professional army is much more efficient over a bunch of amateur cannon fodder dead men walking. And because I take my security seriously, I prefer the best choice.
There 's no stronger motive than personal gain.
Have you ever heard of the word "training"? Martial experts train without having to kill anyone to get their "skillz".
I prefer security. Maybe you prefer your money over security. Then obviously it does make sense to advocate that other people slave away to compensate for your being a cheapskate.
Obviously it 's mine, I did not say it was yours. You are free to beat up your kids to "mold them" I guess![]()
Obviously it 's mine, I did not say it was yours. You are free to beat up your kids to "mold them" I guess![]()