[AMA] I've Spent $1M+ on Meta Ads Profitably. Ask me about Scaling, Creative Strategy & Optimization.

Different games, different rules.

Just to clarify the math for the readers so it doesn't get twisted: That is $50k+ Net Profit PER MONTH (on a bad month), not total. When you run offers with a solid backend, the margins are very healthy.

There is definitely money to be made in Black Hat/Cloaking, and I respect the hustle it takes to keep that infrastructure alive. And a 7/10 score is actually decent for a cloaked setup, but once you experience the stability of a compliant setup at scale, it's hard to go back.

For me, the ultimate ROI is the peace of mind. Waking up knowing my ad accounts are stable and my data is clean allows me to focus purely on scaling rather than recovering assets.

Good luck with the grind, mate. There is room for everyone.

My last comment was a bit sarcastic.

First, META rolled out new updates not long ago, a huge one, and everyone (besides you, I guess) is still finding the best ways to handle this.

You come on here presenting yourself as an Authority in the field, 1M+ can mean 50 million a month or 1 million over a year, which one is it?

It would have been so much better if you presented it as "Years of experience working with XYZ brands."

Are they shopping ads that you run?

Is it finance? Is it what? Be more exact on this

Again, the random, 50k+ comfortably - This isn't YouTube where you are trying to impress people, we got people on this forum doing that number in a single day.

A framework? You mentioned your own Frameworks several times, YET again a new update was rolled out with a few more to come

You seem to love entering a GREEKNAME Framework, it means absolutely nothing, maybe to you but it's just completely made up.

Your event quality score = it's not a MUST at all, cool that you have it still doesn't mean anything, as it's just a score. I agree with getting this score up, but only when you actually feed it the correct data and you see proper improvements on your bottom line...

Nobody truly cares how much you run, again repeating myself here, but it's laughable.

The biggest DTC brands don't have meta figured ou,t and neither have you, whether you cloak or don't cloak, it's always a game, meta keeps changin,g and it's not like they have a routemap for every single brand, setup, server setup and all the hundreds of different industries out there.

Just to clarify

- I don't JUST run blackhat but i do for sure
- Hardly getting banned, or losing "assets", what kind of assets are you even on about?

ANYONE and this might surprise you will have a pixel backed up, stored safely, etc

You probably have too, if you don't I highly recommend you do as WHITE can get banned easily too, but you already know this I guess?

Meta doesn't give a flying shit about your accounts, bro. Anyone running legit should be very aware of having multiple accounts to work with no matter the size unless you got a manager on standby and even then, there are a thousand different industries running.

I also never wake up stressed, you are acting as just by running "blackhat" we got no game-plan together lmao, that game-plan might be way better than yours but I don't know I see no point in comparing it.

Yes, I got a course on "cloaking" but never in my life have I run an agency or campaigns for others as my stuff is just way too lucrative to even spend my time on that.

Some of the biggest industries to ever to exist on this earth aren't so welcome on meta ads, but sure as hell run numbers you haven't ever seen in your life.

To sum this up, and I am not going to bother here anymore, your entire posts sound fishy with the signature under it, talking a whole lot without giving any real-life scenarios


Please don't open a AMA as it's for people that are in THAT position, making claims like you did even JUST a few weeks after one of the biggest Meta ads update claiming some of your CLEOPATRA DE LUXA MORSIOUS FRAMEWORKS are the shit, please...

People here aren't that stupid; this isn't YouTube for 12-year-olds.

I am out.
 
Last edited:
But if I’m running multiple CBO campaigns, wouldn’t auction overlap be way higher compared to ABO ad sets?
Especially if I’m trying to scale to the same audience, like, within one single campaign the conflict would be smaller, right?


What are those phases you mentioned? What do you mean by 18 campaigns, and what’s the purpose of each one?


Now a more challenging question, if you had to run ads with a low budget, around $27 per day, how would you structure your campaigns to extract the maximum results? (assuming the offer is already validated)


About the 1-1-10 method, how am I supposed to scale using just one campaign?
That sounds pretty extreme to me, because Facebook might suppress good creatives, and I also feel that spending less sometimes makes the algorithm more accurate with a higher ROI. So my mindset leans more toward “running multiple low-budget campaigns and trying to avoid overlap between them” but I’m open to new perspectives.


Final question, audience overlap.
How do you handle it? In the sense of campaigns competing against each other… how do you fix that? How do you avoid overlap so you can run multiple audiences without them clashing?

Thank you for the feedback!
Hey. Very interesting questions here. I’m excited to answer this and bring some real gems to the forum because there is too much outdated advice floating around.

Let’s break it down, point by point.

1. AUCTION OVERLAP. Auction Overlap DOES NOT EXIST anymore. Unless you are investing more than $100k/month, it simply doesn't exist. That is one of the main "whys" I keep telling people to stop listening to advice from 6 months ago.

The Gem: Nowadays, the game has changed completely. Targeting narrow audiences to find "super niches" is a thing of the past. If you want to use interests, you must stack at least 20 of them. The bigger the audience, the better for the Meta Algorithm. Targeting isn't at the Ad Set level anymore; it is at the Ad Level. Thanks to SAM AI (Segment Anything Model), Meta reads your whole image/video and copy, and based on that + pixel data, it finds the best persona for you.

2. THE STRATEGY: THE "ROASIA" FRAMEWORK You asked about the "phases." This is my proprietary framework (I call it ROASIA) developed after managing millions in spend.

The old "Linear Funnel" (Awareness -> Wait 15 days -> Consideration -> Wait -> Conversion) is obsolete. It’s too slow for today’s attention economy.

ROASIA is a Circular Ecosystem based on Speed.

Here is the breakdown of the phases:

Phase 1: HOOK:
  • Objective: Awareness (TruePlays) & Traffic to Instagram Profile.
  • Content: Viral or High-Value content.
  • The Goal: We need to stop the scroll in the first 3 seconds. If we don't hook them, we don't exist.
Phase 2: SOLVE:
  • Objective: SALES.
  • Timing: I activate this ON THE SAME DAY as Phase 1. Speed is key. If I hook you at 9 AM, I want to sell to you by 12 PM. If I don't, a competitor will.
  • Content: Hybrid (Value + Hard Sell). We address the problems identified in the hook and offer the product as the only logical solution.
Phase 3: RETAIN:
  • Objective: Sales (Remarketing).
  • Timing: Same Day.
  • Audience: People who visited IG or messaged us (Warm).
  • Content: Connection & Validation (Testimonials, Social Proof). We are closing the trust gap immediately.
Phase 4: ENVELOP - THE SECRET SAUCE This is the most critical part that nobody does. I allocate 2% of the total budget here to create an infinite "Content Loop." We trap the user in our ecosystem based on time windows:

  • 0-24 Hours (The Introduction): Show a "Who We Are" video. No CTA. Just authority.
  • 2-7 Days (The Wound): Agitate the problem. "Poke the wound" so they realize they have an issue.
  • 8-30 Days (The Solution): Pure Value & Education. Show them how to solve it.
  • 30-60 Days (The Transformation): Show the lifestyle/dream outcome.
  • Result: They can never leave your funnel. You are always there.
3. LOW BUDGET STRATEGY ($27/day) First, a reality check: If you are targeting the US, please don't try to spend less than $3k/month. High CPM countries will eat that budget alive.

However, if you are in a non-competitive niche or Tier 2/3 country, here is the structure:
  • Split: 85% to Phase 2 (Direct Sales) with lots of creatives + 15% to Phase 3 (Retargeting).
  • Why? Attention is ephemeral. People don't remember the ad they saw 2 days ago. You MUST have that 15% remarketing layer to stay in their mind, even on a low budget.
4. ADVANCED SCALING: THE "SURFING" METHOD You asked about scaling. I use Surfing Scaling. This is the "Legend Level" of scaling.

Warning: Only do this if you can check your Ads Manager every 2 hours (4 times a day).

The Protocol:
  1. 8:00 AM (Check 1):Look at your campaigns. If the Cost Per Result (CPA) is great (better than yesterday), you caught a "Wave."
    • Action: Increase budget by 25% (e.g., from $30 to $37.50).
  2. 10:00 AM (Check 2):Check performance.
    • Action: If CPA is still stable or good, increase by another 25%.
  3. 12:00 PM (Check 3):Check performance.
    • Action: If it holds, increase another 25%.

    • CRITICAL: If CPA spikes (gets expensive), IMMEDIATELY REVERT the budget to the previous amount. The wave crashed. Stop scaling.
  4. 2:00 PM (Check 4): Final check. Max 4 increases per day.

  5. THE RESET: At Midnight, ALWAYS reset all budgets back to the original baseline (e.g., back to $30).
Why this works: Meta puts your ads in different "audience buckets" every day. Some days you hit a winning bucket. Surfing allows you to spend $500 on a winning day and stay at $30 on a losing day.

5. THE 1-1-10 RULE & CREATIVE STRATEGY "Facebook might suppress good creatives" -> This is outdated. Thanks to Andromeda, you DO NOT need to turn off "bad creatives." Leave them ALL ON. Andromeda will automatically allocate spend to the winner.

The Golden Rule of Testing:
  • You MUST create at least 2 new campaigns per week, each with 10 new creatives.
  • Testing Budget: You do NOT need big money to test.
  • Structure: 1 Campaign -> 3 Ad Sets -> 10 Creatives.
  • Spend: You can test with $1 USD to $5 USD MAX per Ad Set.
  • It doesn't matter if you have a $1M budget. Always test cheap. If an ad converts at $3, it will scale. If it doesn't convert at $3, throwing $100 at it won't fix it.
6. THE 7-DAY RULE Finally, a rule to live by: NEVER TURN OFF A CAMPAIGN BEFORE 7 DAYS. Anyone telling you otherwise is giving novice advice.

The Logic:
  • Days 1-3 (Seeking): The algorithm is exploring audiences. Costs are high and volatile.
  • Days 4-7 (Bidding): The algorithm starts entering cheaper auctions and stabilizing.
  • Day 8: This is the only time you should make optimization decisions.
Hope this deep dive helps you and everyone reading this to stop burning money on outdated strategies!

How did you scale the campaign?
most of my campaign when increase the budget die within 2 days
Hey. I detailed the technical "Surfing" method in my previous answer above, but I know exactly the pain you are describing.

"Why does my campaign die within 2 days of scaling?" This is the most common issue in media buying. Here is the reality check and the fix:

1. The "Reverse Scale" Tactic: If you scale and the CPA spikes heavily within 48 hours, simply revert to the original budget. Don't overthink it. The algorithm tried to find more people at that price, couldn't find them, and spent your money on bad impressions. Go back to what was working.

2. The Hard Pill to Swallow: You must admit that not every campaign is scalable. Some ads are "Ponies," not "Racehorses." They work great at $50/day but break at $200/day.
  • The Strategy: Keep that "Pony" campaign alive at its profitable budget (don't kill it). But to scale revenue, you need to launch a NEW campaign with completely new creatives.
3. Creative Volume & Triggers (The Andromeda Fuel): To scale, you need to feed Andromeda at least 10 NEW Creatives. Not just changing the background color, but hitting completely different psychological angles.

You need to diversify your Emotional Triggers:
  • Scarcity/Urgency: "Only 3 left," "Offer ends in 24h."
  • Social Proof/Bandwagon: "Over 10,000 satisfied customers," Testimonials.
  • Authority: "Recommended by Dentists/Experts."
  • Curiosity: "The secret method nobody talks about..." (Great for CTR).
  • Greed/Value: "Save 50%," "Buy 1 Get 1 Free."
  • Fear (FOMO/Pain): "Stop losing money," "Don't miss out."
  • Identity/Pride: "For the serious investor," "Only for moms who care."
IMPORTANT TRICK: If you already have a 100% proven winner, don't trash it. Iterate the Hook. Keep the body of the video/ad the same, but create 5-10 versions of just the first 3 seconds.
  • Version A: Visual Hook (Weird movement).
  • Version B: Text Hook (Question).
  • Version C: Audio Hook (Sound effect).
  • Then, launch 5 completely new concepts alongside these variations.
"BUT CREATING 10 ADS IS EXPENSIVE/HARD..." -> PLEASE READ THIS:

In the past, creating this massive amount of creatives was a headache and required a huge design budget. Nowadays, you have no excuse.

Thanks to AI, scaling creative volume is possible even as a 'solopreneur' with a low budget:
  1. Visuals: You can use tools like Freepik AI or Midjourney. They are super cheap and you can generate unlimited high-quality assets without hiring a graphic designer.
  2. Video/UGC: You don't need to ship products to influencers. Tools like HeyGen or Hedra allows you to create UGC-style videos with AI avatars that look frighteningly real.
  3. Scripts: Use LLMs to write your scripts based on the triggers I mentioned above.
There are literally TONS of tools competing right now, driving the price down. This gives us a massive opportunity to compete against big brands if we are fast enough to adapt.

Scale your creative production, and you will scale your ads.

Hope this helps!
My last comment was a bit sarcastic.

First, META rolled out new updates not long ago, a huge one, and everyone (besides you, I guess) is still finding the best ways to handle this.

You come on here presenting yourself as an Authority in the field, 1M+ can mean 50 million a month or 1 million over a year, which one is it?

It would have been so much better if you presented it as "Years of experience working with XYZ brands."

Are they shopping ads that you run?

Is it finance? Is it what? Be more exact on this

Again, the random, 50k+ comfortably - This isn't YouTube where you are trying to impress people, we got people on this forum doing that number in a single day.

A framework? You mentioned your own Frameworks several times, YET again a new update was rolled out with a few more to come

You seem to love entering a GREEKNAME Framework, it means absolutely nothing, maybe to you but it's just completely made up.

Your event quality score = it's not a MUST at all, cool that you have it still doesn't mean anything, as it's just a score. I agree with getting this score up, but only when you actually feed it the correct data and you see proper improvements on your bottom line...

Nobody truly cares how much you run, again repeating myself here, but it's laughable.

The biggest DTC brands don't have meta figured ou,t and neither have you, whether you cloak or don't cloak, it's always a game, meta keeps changin,g and it's not like they have a routemap for every single brand, setup, server setup and all the hundreds of different industries out there.

Just to clarify

- I don't JUST run blackhat but i do for sure
- Hardly getting banned, or losing "assets", what kind of assets are you even on about?

ANYONE and this might surprise you will have a pixel backed up, stored safely, etc

You probably have too, if you don't I highly recommend you do as WHITE can get banned easily too, but you already know this I guess?

Meta doesn't give a flying shit about your accounts, bro. Anyone running legit should be very aware of having multiple accounts to work with no matter the size unless you got a manager on standby and even then, there are a thousand different industries running.

I also never wake up stressed, you are acting as just by running "blackhat" we got no game-plan together lmao, that game-plan might be way better than yours but I don't know I see no point in comparing it.

Yes, I got a course on "cloaking" but never in my life have I run an agency or campaigns for others as my stuff is just way too lucrative to even spend my time on that.

Some of the biggest industries to ever to exist on this earth aren't so welcome on meta ads, but sure as hell run numbers you haven't ever seen in your life.

To sum this up, and I am not going to bother here anymore, your entire posts sound fishy with the signature under it, talking a whole lot without giving any real-life scenarios


Please don't open a AMA as it's for people that are in THAT position, making claims like you did even JUST a few weeks after one of the biggest Meta ads update claiming some of your CLEOPATRA DE LUXA MORSIOUS FRAMEWORKS are the shit, please...

People here aren't that stupid; this isn't YouTube for 12-year-olds.

I am out.
Let’s lower the temperature and talk facts.

1. On "Andromeda" being new: Actually, let me correct you there. While the public buzz started recently, the core architecture of Andromeda (GenAI + Lattice retrieval) began rolling out in December 2024. I’ve been analyzing this transition for a full year.

2. On Authority & "Who am I": To clarify the numbers since you asked:
  • Spend: That $1M+ is in the last 6 months profitably.
  • Experience: I’ve been running FB Ads for 10 years and Google Ads for 8. I was buying media before the Pixel even existed.
  • Background: I am a Computer Engineer specializing in AI & Data Science.
  • Why this matters: I don't look at Ads Manager like a marketer guessing; I look at it like an engineer analyzing a backend system. That is why I obsess over EMQ.
3. "What do you run?": Since you want "real-life scenarios":
  • Evergreen ($50k/mo profit): Low, Mid, and High-Ticket Services via Conversational Funnels. I operate across a wide range of niches including Dental, Legal, Plastic Surgery, Psychology, Parenting, Speech Therapy, Lactation Consulting, and Auto Workshops.
  • Launches ($200k spikes): Digital Info-Products (Jeff Walker style launches in LATAM).
  • Total: I'm not claiming to be the richest man on BHW (I know affiliates like Alex Micol do $1M/mo). But I do well enough to not need to sell a course here.
4. The "Greek Framework" & Psychology: You seem hung up on the name. Call it whatever you want. The reason I use a Framework (ROASIA) is precisely BECAUSE Meta changes every week.

My strategy is not based on the algorithm; it is based on Human Psychology.
  • Algorithms change.
  • Human fears, desires, and triggers do not.
  • Meta is just a canvas; psychology is the paint.
If you rely on "hacks," you panic when an update drops. If you rely on psychology, updates just give you better tools to deploy that psychology.

5. On EMQ: You say it's "not a MUST." If you read Meta's technical documentation on Signal Resilience and Lattice, you’d know that an EMQ < 9 means you are feeding low-fidelity data to a probabilistic model. As a Data Scientist, I can tell you: Garbage In, Garbage Out. If you want the AI to work for you, you must feed it high-fidelity data. No discussion allowed there.

6. "Sounding Fishy": I am sharing all of this FOR FREE. I have detailed my entire scaling strategy, my testing structure, and my funnel logic in this thread without asking for a dime.

You are gatekeeping "lucrative secrets"; I am democratizing knowledge.

I respect your hustle in the BlackHat/Cloaking space—it's a different beast. But don't confuse a structured, engineering-based approach to White/Gray Hat scaling with "mysticism."

Let's keep the thread valuable for the learners.
 
Last edited:
Let's keep the thread valuable for the learners.

It's exactly what I am trying to do,

Let's break down your posts again,

LMAO AI is having a field day with this so im just going to stick with that.

Let's get this going, shall we?


--------------------------------------------------------

He keeps pushing how he’s giving everything away for free, while his signature is selling his agency


That is the biggest intent mismatch.
When someone keeps emphasizing:
  • “I’m not selling anything”
  • “I’m sharing for free”
  • “I don’t need to sell a course”

…while a commercial link sits right under their posts, that’s a sales tactic in disguise.


It’s pre-framing:

“I’m not here to sell you anything, I’m just transparent.”
Which actually positions him to sell more effectively.

He frames disagreement as ignorance


“If you read Meta’s technical documentation… you’d know…”
“No discussion allowed there.”

This is a bully tactic.
Experts invite debate.
Fakers shut down debate.


This “no discussion allowed” line is actually the biggest tell that his “expertise” is fragile.

He claims exclusivity (“I’ve been studying Andromeda for a year”) but Meta hasn't even publicly detailed half of what he’s asserting


He claims:
  • “core architecture rolled out in Dec 2024”
  • “been analyzing it for a full year”
  • “technical documentation says X”

Meta hasn’t released that level of engineering clarity publicly — not even to partners.

If his claims were real:
  • He’d be under NDA and couldn’t post them.
  • He wouldn't be saying it on BHW.

This is posturing.


He uses pseudo-technical language to intimidate


He throws in:
  • “Andromeda”
  • “GenAI + Lattice retrieval”
  • “Signal Resilience”
  • “Probabilistic model”
  • “High-fidelity data”
  • “EMQ < 9”

This is NOT how real performance media buyers talk.


He’s mixing:
  • real Meta terms
  • plus internal engineering terminology
  • plus speculation
  • plus jargon designed to sound like he knows private information.

This is classic “too much terminology, not enough actionable explanation.”

His revenue claims don’t match realistic patterns


“Evergreen ($50k/mo profit)
Launches ($200k spikes)”

The numbers don’t align with industry norms:


  • $50k/mo profit but also doing $1M+ in spend in only 6 months?
  • No clear breakdown of ROI, cost structure, team size, media %, fees, etc.
  • He mixes “profit” and “spend” numbers in ways that sound impressive but don’t line up mathematically.

People who are actually profitable at scale explain the model, not just the revenue.


He uses vague, unprovable claims and wide niche coverage

He claims to profitably run:
  • Dental
  • Legal
  • Plastic surgery
  • Psychology
  • Parenting
  • Speech therapy
  • Lactation
  • Auto workshops

No real agency or media buyer runs all these niches simultaneously at scale.
Each niche has different compliance, funnel demands, creative angles, and unit economics.


When someone lists a “grab bag” of niches, it’s a classic attempt at artificially broadening perceived authority to attract clients.

--------------------------------------------------------


I just couldn't have said it better than AI could.

It's crazy how and for what reason you keep throwing numbers around. NOBODY is impressed with those numbers.

You say so much and nothing at the same time.

This community isn't stupid, get a life, man, maybe actually do some of the things you talk about instead of self loathing.

I also removed the course from my signature as I know you are someone to mix that up, that I am actually being very sincere here and for this community.

I seem to keep repeating this and I don't like throwing numbers around to impress, but you really need to re-consider who you are talking to, not just me but people on this community.

"You ran ads before the pixel"

Good god, I really thought it couldn't get any worse.

And BEFORE you repeat the same nonsense, Yes I have seen even million-dollar days, yes several members have been there, done that, yes plenty of people have experience with meta before there even was a pixel, just throwing this in there before you come up with another "I am so knowledgeable type comment"

Everything about you sounds off, not that any of your income claims are not REAL just how you are repeatly bringing it up, still all baseless claims.

GETTING TIRED, goodluck in fantasy land man, most people just run paid traffic you know? We dont need fantasy framework names like it's some nintendo game lmao
 
Last edited:
Hi BHW,

As the title says, I have managed over $1M in ad spend across various verticals on Meta (Facebook & Instagram), maintaining healthy profit margins.

I know that scaling isn't just about increasing the budget by 20% every day. It’s about structure, creative fatigue management, and robust data tracking.

More now than ever thanks to Andromeda newest update. Is a must have a good server side tracking (CAPI). I currently have my EMQ at 9.3/10 - This is crucial nowadays for getting better ROI.

Whether you are stuck at $100/day or trying to push past $5k/day, the game changes entirely.

I’m opening this thread to help the community and discuss:

  • Scaling Strategies: CBO vs ABO in 2025, horizontal vs vertical scaling.
  • Creative Strategy: How to find winning angles and structure your creative testing.
  • Tracking & Attribution: Dealing with signal loss, Server-Side tracking (CAPI), and understanding your true CPA.
  • Account Health: Keeping your assets compliant while pushing volume.
I've seen the platform change drastically over the last few years, and I'm happy to share what is working right now.

Ask me anything. Let's get those campaigns profitable.

Hi BHW,

As the title says, I have managed over $1M in ad spend across various verticals on Meta (Facebook & Instagram), maintaining healthy profit margins.

I know that scaling isn't just about increasing the budget by 20% every day. It’s about structure, creative fatigue management, and robust data tracking.

More now than ever thanks to Andromeda newest update. Is a must have a good server side tracking (CAPI). I currently have my EMQ at 9.3/10 - This is crucial nowadays for getting better ROI.

Whether you are stuck at $100/day or trying to push past $5k/day, the game changes entirely.

I’m opening this thread to help the community and discuss:

  • Scaling Strategies: CBO vs ABO in 2025, horizontal vs vertical scaling.
  • Creative Strategy: How to find winning angles and structure your creative testing.
  • Tracking & Attribution: Dealing with signal loss, Server-Side tracking (CAPI), and understanding your true CPA.
  • Account Health: Keeping your assets compliant while pushing volume.
I've seen the platform change drastically over the last few years, and I'm happy to share what is working right now.

Ask me anything. Let's get those campaigns profitable.
1 – My target audience is spread across several countries, and I like the idea of separating campaigns by country. But in practice, sometimes it behaves oddly. I’m not sure if it’s because the country is small, for example, Chile has around 19 million people (and I only target women, which narrows it even more).
When I run it worldwide, performance is good, but when I isolate the country, results get strange. The same thing happens with Argentina. Any advice on this? With the U.S. and Mexico it happens less often. I’m not sure if it’s creative fatigue or simply the audience size.

2 – If you only had a small budget, around $20 to $25 per day, how would you structure your campaigns? I have 5–6 validated countries, 2 creatives performing really well, and a third creative that sold a lot before and still seems usable. Other creatives are in production or lightly tested.

3 – My current strategy focuses on keeping campaigns stable with high ROI. So usually I start with a 1-1-1 at $6.50 per day for a single country, and I don’t touch the budget until I get around 10 sales. I earn $23.83 per sale. My logic is: with a low budget, Facebook is forced to be more accurate and selective, which increases ROI. So in my mind, scaling would come from launching as many campaigns as possible for those 5 validated countries, one 1-1-1 CBO campaign for each country and each creative. Would you do it differently or do you see any issue with this approach?

Thank you very much for the feedback.
 

“Auction Overlap doesn’t exist anymore.”


This is simply false.
Auction Overlap still exists — Meta even warns about it in diagnostics.


What is true:
  • Meta has reduced the impact due to L2+ consolidation.
  • But it absolutely exists, especially when running broad + stacked audiences + high creative volume.

Claiming “it doesn’t exist unless you spend $100k/mo” is fiction.

Red flag: Making absolute statements that contradict public Meta documentation.

“Targeting isn’t at the adset level anymore; it’s at the ad level.”


This is partly true but massively overstated.


What’s real:
  • Andromeda does extract semantic signals from the creative (hook, copy, subject, personas, etc.)
  • The algorithm uses this for persona predictions.

But saying targeting is now “at the ad level only” is guru oversimplification.
Adset signals still matter:
  • location
  • language
  • optimization goal
  • audience size
  • placements
  • bid strategy

He turned a nuanced concept into a bold, wrong absolute.

“Stack at least 20 interests.”


This is an old 2021-style advice.
Interests barely matter now.
Most serious buyers run:
  • 1 broad
  • 1 lookalike test
  • maybe a stacked interest set for volume creative testing if really needed

Stacking 20 has no magic effect, it just widens the audience — which broad already does better.


This is “guru filler.”



ROASIA Framework = Buzzword salad


This entire section is 90% descriptive fluff and 10% basic media-buying logic.


Nothing in it is new:
  • Hook
  • CTA
  • Retargeting
  • Content loops
  • Warm sequences
He wrapped normal best practices into a branded pseudo-framework.
Every guru does this.

And his “Envelop loop” is literally just:
  • Intro
  • Problem
  • Solution
  • Lifestyle

This is Dan Kennedy 1990 stuff with new names.


“Use Awareness TruePlays to start a funnel.”


Nobody doing serious performance starts with TruePlays unless:
  • They’re running a brand lift test, or
  • They’re trying to train an IG account

For sales?
Awareness + TruePlays is one of the worst ROAS entry points.


He’s presenting this as revolutionary — but it’s actually not backed by any data from high-spend accounts.


It's INSANE how you come here with absolute GURU TRASH.

THE BIGGEST PATTERN: He uses Meta buzzwords to fake authority


Watch how he does it:

  • Andromeda
  • SAM AI
  • Lattice retrieval
  • Signal Resilience
  • EMQ
  • Auction buckets

He mixes:

  • legit Meta concepts
  • general machine learning vocabulary (This GURU uses AI too)
  • speculative terminology
  • made-up explanations
This creates the illusion of deep technical knowledge.


But a real engineer/media buyer never talks like this because they know:
  • the architecture is not fully public
  • Meta reps don’t even describe it this way
  • performance buying does not require sounding like an ML researcher

This is enthusiastic tech-mysticism with 20% truth.


THE CORE TRUTH


He knows just enough real Meta concepts to impress beginners,
but he’s filling the rest with:


  • speculation
  • frameworks
  • buzzwords
  • misleading absolutes
  • branded tactics
  • vague claims
  • and overinflated authority positioning

This is exactly how agency sellers position themselves on forums.



Feel FREE to PM me your linkedin profile and let's see what you are really working with...

YOU are not helping anymore and its some of the dumbest shit i ever heard, you overcomplicated things TRYING to impress that even mark zuck would slap the shit out of you

Just stop it
 
For anyone who thinks I am wrong about this person, just go look at some of his older posts.

I can talk like a retard at times, and that's what a forum is for, but just take a look at this.

I got ZERO to gain from this just getting tired of these absolute losers on blackhatworld

A lot of people know me on here, I am just going to let AI do the talking again, as damn they explain it so much bette,r and since this "META GURU" uses AI for 99% of his replies, it's better to just let AI go VS AI

1. He’s building an AI-enhanced expert persona, not speaking like a real expert


Real high-level media buyers talk:


  • efficiently
  • with examples
  • with practical logic
    They don’t write philosophical monologues about “psychology being the paint and Meta the canvas.”

That whole style screams:
AI + buzzwords + trying very hard to sound deeper than he is.




2. He overclaims in every direction


He’s claimed:


  • $1M spend in 6 months
  • mastery of Meta
  • mastery of Google Ads thresholds (extremely niche & blackhat)
  • 10 years FB Ads
  • 8 years Google Ads
  • Computer engineer
  • Data scientist
  • Funnel expert
  • Psychology expert
  • Launch specialist
  • Niches from dental to parenting to plastic surgery
  • LATAM launch guru

Nobody with that real background is posting on a forum fishing for attention.


Nobody that advanced is asking:


“Should I reuse my Instagram content on Shorts?”

That destroys his entire façade.




3. The contradictions expose the fake persona


He said:


“I don’t do blackhat.”

But elsewhere:


“I’ve vast experience with blackhat Google Ads thresholds today in July 2025.”

He said:


“I don’t need to sell anything.”

Yet his signature promotes a service/agency.


He said:


“I’ve been analyzing Andromeda for a year.”

But then asks beginner questions about:

  • Content posting
  • Company formation
  • Basic setup knowledge

It’s completely incoherent.




4. The “framework” is almost certainly AI-generated fluff


People who are real operators don’t build:


  • Greek-sounding frameworks
  • Psychology monologues
  • Multi-stage “systems” named dramatically

They build:

repeatable workflows
  • SOPs
  • metrics-based processes

His “ROASIA” framework sounds like:
AI-generated marketing doctrine with 10% truth and 90% filler.


Exactly what scammy “gurus” sell.



5. The long-term pattern = preparing to sell something


Here’s what people like this do:


Step 1 — Build authority using AI-polished posts​


Flood the forum with long, smart-sounding posts that newbies respect.


Step 2 — Create contradictions (doesn’t matter, newbies don’t check history)​


Ask noob-level questions in other threads because they’re actually beginners.

Step 3 — Signal expertise everywhere​


“My framework.”
“My psychology system.”
“My years of experience.”
“My data scientist background.”


Step 4 — Funnel users into signature / DM​


Once enough people trust him, he drops:
  • a paid group
  • consulting
  • an ebook
  • “private method”
  • “premium audits”

This is exactly how bogus operators seed an audience before monetising.



6. The money claims don’t match his behaviour


People running:
  • $1M Meta
  • $50k/mo evergreen
  • $200k launch spikes
  • blackhat thresholds
  • massive multi-niche funnels

…do not spend their time asking:
  • whether to reuse content
  • how to register a US company
  • how to get discounts
  • basic beginner questions
It’s impossible

LOL this is actually funny just using AI to reply to AI but for me the entire thing is WAY to much scammers around and with topics like this without ANY proof no backing and a history of AI posts on this users profile + the dumbest questions.

Few months back this man asked shit on company formation LMAO

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE
 
It's exactly what I am trying to do,

Let's break down your posts again,

LMAO AI is having a field day with this so im just going to stick with that.

Let's get this going, shall we?


--------------------------------------------------------

He keeps pushing how he’s giving everything away for free, while his signature is selling his agency


That is the biggest intent mismatch.
When someone keeps emphasizing:
  • “I’m not selling anything”
  • “I’m sharing for free”
  • “I don’t need to sell a course”

…while a commercial link sits right under their posts, that’s a sales tactic in disguise.


It’s pre-framing:



He frames disagreement as ignorance




This is a bully tactic.
Experts invite debate.
Fakers shut down debate.


This “no discussion allowed” line is actually the biggest tell that his “expertise” is fragile.

He claims exclusivity (“I’ve been studying Andromeda for a year”) but Meta hasn't even publicly detailed half of what he’s asserting


He claims:
  • “core architecture rolled out in Dec 2024”
  • “been analyzing it for a full year”
  • “technical documentation says X”

Meta hasn’t released that level of engineering clarity publicly — not even to partners.

If his claims were real:
  • He’d be under NDA and couldn’t post them.
  • He wouldn't be saying it on BHW.

This is posturing.


He uses pseudo-technical language to intimidate


He throws in:
  • “Andromeda”
  • “GenAI + Lattice retrieval”
  • “Signal Resilience”
  • “Probabilistic model”
  • “High-fidelity data”
  • “EMQ < 9”

This is NOT how real performance media buyers talk.


He’s mixing:
  • real Meta terms
  • plus internal engineering terminology
  • plus speculation
  • plus jargon designed to sound like he knows private information.

This is classic “too much terminology, not enough actionable explanation.”

His revenue claims don’t match realistic patterns




The numbers don’t align with industry norms:


  • $50k/mo profit but also doing $1M+ in spend in only 6 months?
  • No clear breakdown of ROI, cost structure, team size, media %, fees, etc.
  • He mixes “profit” and “spend” numbers in ways that sound impressive but don’t line up mathematically.

People who are actually profitable at scale explain the model, not just the revenue.


He uses vague, unprovable claims and wide niche coverage

He claims to profitably run:
  • Dental
  • Legal
  • Plastic surgery
  • Psychology
  • Parenting
  • Speech therapy
  • Lactation
  • Auto workshops

No real agency or media buyer runs all these niches simultaneously at scale.
Each niche has different compliance, funnel demands, creative angles, and unit economics.


When someone lists a “grab bag” of niches, it’s a classic attempt at artificially broadening perceived authority to attract clients.

--------------------------------------------------------


I just couldn't have said it better than AI could.

It's crazy how and for what reason you keep throwing numbers around. NOBODY is impressed with those numbers.

You say so much and nothing at the same time.

This community isn't stupid, get a life, man, maybe actually do some of the things you talk about instead of self loathing.

I also removed the course from my signature as I know you are someone to mix that up, that I am actually being very sincere here and for this community.

I seem to keep repeating this and I don't like throwing numbers around to impress, but you really need to re-consider who you are talking to, not just me but people on this community.

"You ran ads before the pixel"

Good god, I really thought it couldn't get any worse.

And BEFORE you repeat the same nonsense, Yes I have seen even million-dollar days, yes several members have been there, done that, yes plenty of people have experience with meta before there even was a pixel, just throwing this in there before you come up with another "I am so knowledgeable type comment"

Everything about you sounds off, not that any of your income claims are not REAL just how you are repeatly bringing it up, still all baseless claims.

GETTING TIRED, goodluck in fantasy land man, most people just run paid traffic you know? We dont need fantasy framework names like it's some nintendo game lmao
So you had to copy-paste a ChatGPT analysis because you couldn't formulate a counter-argument yourself? That says more about your depth of knowledge than anything else.

But since the AI raised some points, let’s address them for the community, transparency style.

1. The "Intent Mismatch" (Agency Signature): Yes, I run an Agency. It's literally in my signature. I’m not hiding it. There is no "trick" here.

I give the Knowledge (Strategies, Frameworks, Technical Setup) for FREE.

I offer the Execution (Service) for those who have the budget but not the time. That is how a service business works on BHW. I’m not selling a $997 video course teaching theory. I’m an operator.

2. The "Niche Grab Bag": "No real media buyer runs all these niches simultaneously." Correct. A Solo Media Buyer doesn't. An AGENCY does. I have teams and pods dedicated to different verticals. I oversee the strategy and data architecture (the Engineering side), while my media buyers execute the day-to-day. That is how you scale past being a freelancer.

3. "Andromeda" & Technical Jargon: You call it "pseudo-technical"; I call it Reverse Engineering. I don't need an NDA or insider leaks to analyze the API documentation, observe the shift in Lattice retrieval, or test thousands of ads to see the pattern recognition change. As a Computer Engineer, I look at the backend logic, not just the Ads Manager interface. If that intimidates you, that's not my intention. My intention is to elevate the conversation beyond "just test more interests."

4. The Math: It's simple Agency Economics:

$1M+ Spend: Client Budget managed.

$50k/mo Profit: My Net Take-home (Fees + Performance Bonuses).

$200k Spikes: Launch Revenue (Revenue Share). The math aligns perfectly if you understand the business model.

Final thought: You removed your link to claim the moral high ground. I keep mine because I’m proud of the work my team does.

I’m done with the flame war. You stick to your methods, I’ll stick to mine. I’m going back to answering questions for people who actually want to learn.
1 – My target audience is spread across several countries, and I like the idea of separating campaigns by country. But in practice, sometimes it behaves oddly. I’m not sure if it’s because the country is small, for example, Chile has around 19 million people (and I only target women, which narrows it even more).
When I run it worldwide, performance is good, but when I isolate the country, results get strange. The same thing happens with Argentina. Any advice on this? With the U.S. and Mexico it happens less often. I’m not sure if it’s creative fatigue or simply the audience size.

2 – If you only had a small budget, around $20 to $25 per day, how would you structure your campaigns? I have 5–6 validated countries, 2 creatives performing really well, and a third creative that sold a lot before and still seems usable. Other creatives are in production or lightly tested.

3 – My current strategy focuses on keeping campaigns stable with high ROI. So usually I start with a 1-1-1 at $6.50 per day for a single country, and I don’t touch the budget until I get around 10 sales. I earn $23.83 per sale. My logic is: with a low budget, Facebook is forced to be more accurate and selective, which increases ROI. So in my mind, scaling would come from launching as many campaigns as possible for those 5 validated countries, one 1-1-1 CBO campaign for each country and each creative. Would you do it differently or do you see any issue with this approach?

Thank you very much for the feedback.
Hey. These are legitimate scaling questions. Let's analyze them through the lens of data science and the current algorithm mechanics.

1. The "Small Country" Paradox (Chile/Argentina): You are experiencing a Data Density issue. When you run Worldwide, the algorithm has a massive pool to find the "lowest hanging fruit" (cheapest conversions). It surfs between countries to find users.

When you isolate Chile (19M pop -> Women only -> ~7M active users), the pool shrinks. If you add interest targeting on top of that, you are suffocating the algorithm.
  • The Fix: For smaller countries like Chile or Argentina, you MUST go Broad (no interests, just Age/Gender).
  • The Strategy: Don't isolate them 1-by-1 if they are unstable. Group them by "Cultural/Economic Clusters."
    • Create a "LATAM Tier 1" CBO: Chile + Mexico + Brazil (if you speak Portuguese) + Colombia.
    • Let the CBO allocate budget to the country performing best that day. This gives stability.
2. Low Budget Structure ($20 - $25/day): Be careful. Spreading $25 across 5-6 countries is diluting your data. You will never exit the Learning Phase.

My recommendation for Max Results:
  • Focus: Pick your TOP 3 performing countries. Group them in ONE CBO.
  • Structure (ROASIA Mini-Setup):
    • 85% Budget ($21): Phase 2 (Solve/Sales). 1 CBO Campaign -> 1 Ad Set (Broad, 3 Countries grouped) -> All 3 Winning Creatives inside.
    • 15% Budget ($4): Phase 3 (Retain/Remarketing). 1 Campaign targeting IG Engagers/Website Visitors (Last 30 days).
Why? Even with a small budget, you need that remarketing layer to catch the people who clicked but got distracted.

3. The 1-1-1 Strategy ($6.50/day) vs. Scaling: Your logic is "Sniper logic" (Low budget = High bid pressure = High ROI).
  • The Good: It works for maintaining high ROAS on small spend.
  • The Bad: It is terrible for scaling. It creates Data Fragmentation.
By creating separate 1-1-1 campaigns for every creative and country, you are slicing your data into tiny pieces. Andromeda (the AI) hates this. It needs consolidated data to learn patterns.

The Issue: If you scale by launching 50 tiny campaigns, you manage a nightmare. If one creative dies, the whole campaign dies.

My Advice: Move to a 1-1-10 or 1-1-20 structure.
  • Put your 3 winning creatives into ONE Ad Set.
  • Let Meta compete them against each other.
  • This consolidates the data (sales) into one vessel, helping the Ad Set exit the learning phase faster and stabilize.
1-1-1 is a "Scarcity Mindset" strategy. To scale, you need a "Consolidation Mindset."

Hope this helps you shift gears!

“Auction Overlap doesn’t exist anymore.”


This is simply false.
Auction Overlap still exists — Meta even warns about it in diagnostics.


What is true:
  • Meta has reduced the impact due to L2+ consolidation.
  • But it absolutely exists, especially when running broad + stacked audiences + high creative volume.

Claiming “it doesn’t exist unless you spend $100k/mo” is fiction.

Red flag: Making absolute statements that contradict public Meta documentation.

“Targeting isn’t at the adset level anymore; it’s at the ad level.”


This is partly true but massively overstated.


What’s real:
  • Andromeda does extract semantic signals from the creative (hook, copy, subject, personas, etc.)
  • The algorithm uses this for persona predictions.

But saying targeting is now “at the ad level only” is guru oversimplification.
Adset signals still matter:
  • location
  • language
  • optimization goal
  • audience size
  • placements
  • bid strategy

He turned a nuanced concept into a bold, wrong absolute.

“Stack at least 20 interests.”


This is an old 2021-style advice.
Interests barely matter now.
Most serious buyers run:
  • 1 broad
  • 1 lookalike test
  • maybe a stacked interest set for volume creative testing if really needed

Stacking 20 has no magic effect, it just widens the audience — which broad already does better.


This is “guru filler.”



ROASIA Framework = Buzzword salad


This entire section is 90% descriptive fluff and 10% basic media-buying logic.


Nothing in it is new:
  • Hook
  • CTA
  • Retargeting
  • Content loops
  • Warm sequences
He wrapped normal best practices into a branded pseudo-framework.
Every guru does this.

And his “Envelop loop” is literally just:
  • Intro
  • Problem
  • Solution
  • Lifestyle

This is Dan Kennedy 1990 stuff with new names.


“Use Awareness TruePlays to start a funnel.”


Nobody doing serious performance starts with TruePlays unless:
  • They’re running a brand lift test, or
  • They’re trying to train an IG account

For sales?
Awareness + TruePlays is one of the worst ROAS entry points.


He’s presenting this as revolutionary — but it’s actually not backed by any data from high-spend accounts.


It's INSANE how you come here with absolute GURU TRASH.

THE BIGGEST PATTERN: He uses Meta buzzwords to fake authority


Watch how he does it:

  • Andromeda
  • SAM AI
  • Lattice retrieval
  • Signal Resilience
  • EMQ
  • Auction buckets

He mixes:

  • legit Meta concepts
  • general machine learning vocabulary (This GURU uses AI too)
  • speculative terminology
  • made-up explanations
This creates the illusion of deep technical knowledge.


But a real engineer/media buyer never talks like this because they know:
  • the architecture is not fully public
  • Meta reps don’t even describe it this way
  • performance buying does not require sounding like an ML researcher

This is enthusiastic tech-mysticism with 20% truth.


THE CORE TRUTH


He knows just enough real Meta concepts to impress beginners,
but he’s filling the rest with:


  • speculation
  • frameworks
  • buzzwords
  • misleading absolutes
  • branded tactics
  • vague claims
  • and overinflated authority positioning

This is exactly how agency sellers position themselves on forums.



Feel FREE to PM me your linkedin profile and let's see what you are really working with...

YOU are not helping anymore and its some of the dumbest shit i ever heard, you overcomplicated things TRYING to impress that even mark zuck would slap the shit out of you

Just stop it
You seem extremely angry for a Monday. Let’s wrap this up because you are resorting to "Dox me" tactics, and that’s not what BHW is about.

1. On LinkedIn & "Doxing":" Feel FREE to PM me your linkedin profile" Nice try. Rule #1 of BlackHatWorld: Anonymity. I don't need to prove my identity to a random user who gets emotional over marketing theory. My value is in the posts I write, not the title on my LinkedIn.

2. On "Dan Kennedy 1990 Stuff": You meant that as an insult, but I take it as a massive compliment. YES. It is Dan Kennedy stuff. It is Eugene Schwartz stuff. That is exactly my point.
  • You chase the algorithm: You cloak, you hide, you look for the hack.
  • I use classic psychology: I wrap timeless direct response principles (Kennedy) into modern placements (Meta). If you think using "Problem-Agitation-Solution" is a bad thing because it's from the 90s, you don't understand marketing; you only understand media buying.
3. On Awareness/TruePlays: "Awareness + TruePlays is one of the worst ROAS entry points." This exposes your limitations. If you are a pure Dropshipper/Affiliate looking for a 1-click purchase, yes, Awareness sucks. But if you are selling Low, Mid, High-Ticket ($2k+ services) or building a Brand, you cannot just scream "BUY NOW" to cold traffic. We use TruePlays to build custom audiences cheaply, so we can retarget them with high-intent ads later. It’s called a Full Funnel Strategy. It’s not for selling $20 gadgets; it’s for building 7-figure asset value.

4. On "Buzzwords" & Tech: You call it "Tech-Mysticism." I call it understanding the machine. You don't need to know how a combustion engine works to drive a car. But if you are a Formula 1 mechanic, you better know how the fuel injection timing works. I treat Meta like an Engineer. You treat it like a Gambler. Both can make money, but I prefer my way.

5. On Auction Overlap: Yes, the warning light exists in Ads Manager. Does it negatively impact the CPM or CPA of a $500/day account running 3 broad ad sets? Statistically, negligible. You are focusing on the "Warning Label"; I am focusing on the "Bottom Line Impact."

Final Words: You are clearly triggered because I challenge your "Black Hat / Guru" worldview with a structured, corporate-level approach.
 
For anyone who thinks I am wrong about this person, just go look at some of his older posts.

I can talk like a retard at times, and that's what a forum is for, but just take a look at this.

I got ZERO to gain from this just getting tired of these absolute losers on blackhatworld

A lot of people know me on here, I am just going to let AI do the talking again, as damn they explain it so much bette,r and since this "META GURU" uses AI for 99% of his replies, it's better to just let AI go VS AI

1. He’s building an AI-enhanced expert persona, not speaking like a real expert


Real high-level media buyers talk:


  • efficiently
  • with examples
  • with practical logic
    They don’t write philosophical monologues about “psychology being the paint and Meta the canvas.”

That whole style screams:
AI + buzzwords + trying very hard to sound deeper than he is.




2. He overclaims in every direction


He’s claimed:


  • $1M spend in 6 months
  • mastery of Meta
  • mastery of Google Ads thresholds (extremely niche & blackhat)
  • 10 years FB Ads
  • 8 years Google Ads
  • Computer engineer
  • Data scientist
  • Funnel expert
  • Psychology expert
  • Launch specialist
  • Niches from dental to parenting to plastic surgery
  • LATAM launch guru

Nobody with that real background is posting on a forum fishing for attention.


Nobody that advanced is asking:




That destroys his entire façade.




3. The contradictions expose the fake persona


He said:




But elsewhere:




He said:




Yet his signature promotes a service/agency.


He said:




But then asks beginner questions about:

  • Content posting
  • Company formation
  • Basic setup knowledge

It’s completely incoherent.




4. The “framework” is almost certainly AI-generated fluff


People who are real operators don’t build:


  • Greek-sounding frameworks
  • Psychology monologues
  • Multi-stage “systems” named dramatically

They build:

repeatable workflows
  • SOPs
  • metrics-based processes

His “ROASIA” framework sounds like:
AI-generated marketing doctrine with 10% truth and 90% filler.


Exactly what scammy “gurus” sell.



5. The long-term pattern = preparing to sell something


Here’s what people like this do:


Step 1 — Build authority using AI-polished posts​


Flood the forum with long, smart-sounding posts that newbies respect.


Step 2 — Create contradictions (doesn’t matter, newbies don’t check history)​


Ask noob-level questions in other threads because they’re actually beginners.

Step 3 — Signal expertise everywhere​


“My framework.”
“My psychology system.”
“My years of experience.”
“My data scientist background.”


Step 4 — Funnel users into signature / DM​


Once enough people trust him, he drops:
  • a paid group
  • consulting
  • an ebook
  • “private method”
  • “premium audits”

This is exactly how bogus operators seed an audience before monetising.



6. The money claims don’t match his behaviour


People running:
  • $1M Meta
  • $50k/mo evergreen
  • $200k launch spikes
  • blackhat thresholds
  • massive multi-niche funnels

…do not spend their time asking:
  • whether to reuse content
  • how to register a US company
  • how to get discounts
  • basic beginner questions
It’s impossible

LOL this is actually funny just using AI to reply to AI but for me the entire thing is WAY to much scammers around and with topics like this without ANY proof no backing and a history of AI posts on this users profile + the dumbest questions.

Few months back this man asked shit on company formation LMAO

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE
Wow, you really went full "Internet Detective" on a Monday. And yet, you still needed AI to write your insults for you. That is actually hilarious.

Let’s dismantle your "Gotcha" moments one last time, point by point.

1. The "Beginner Questions" (Organic vs. Paid): You dug up posts about Instagram Shorts and Organic content? Newsflash: Being a Top 1% Media Buyer (Paid Traffic) does not make someone an expert in Organic Content Creation. They are two completely different sports.
  • Also, full transparency: This BHW account has shared access. My sister manages the organic side of our projects and asks questions here.
  • But even if it was me asking: Smart people ask questions when they step out of their zone of genius. Only fools pretend to know everything.
2. The BlackHat Contradiction (Read carefully, this will hurt): You claim I contradicted myself about BlackHat. Check the context.
  • I said I don't run META BlackHat. (Because Meta's bans are annoying and disrupt High-Ticket funnels).
  • I absolutely run GOOGLE ADS BlackHat (Thresholds).
Yes, I play both sides. I run WhiteHat on Meta for stability/branding ($50k/mo profit), and I run BlackHat on Google for aggressive yield. Although,

I don't use Cloaking. I hate it and for me is absolutely not worth it at all.

The fact that I can switch between being a "WhiteHat Consultant" and a "BlackHat Thresholder" implies I have more depth than you, not less. I know exactly where to break the rules and where to follow them.

3. "Company Formation Questions": You think asking about US Company Formation is a "noob" question? Scaling from LATAM to the US involves complex Tax & Legal structuring. Asking for advice on the best state for an LLC or tax implications is what Business Owners do. Broke people assume; rich people ask lawyers and forums to optimize taxes.

4. "AI Persona": You keep screaming "AI! AI!" because you can't comprehend that someone can write structured, articulate English without a bot. I’m an Engineer. We think in systems. We write in systems.

Also, ever heard of an app called Grammarly? I use it to polish my spelling and grammar because I care about quality. The difference is: I use tools to correct my writing; you depend on AI to think for you. Big difference.

Final Reality Check: You are spending your Monday stalking my post history, running it through ChatGPT, and writing essays to "expose" me. I am answering user questions and running my business.

You are obsessed with me. It’s getting weird.

I’m done feeding your need for attention. Reply whatever you want—I won't see it. I'm going back to the money.

Bye.
 
LOL GOOD GAME

Yes, I even told you I was replying to AI with AI, never thought this would happen, but it's kinda awesome

  • Also, full transparency: This BHW account has shared access. My sister manages the organic side of our projects and asks questions here.

I’m done feeding your need for attention. Reply whatever you want—I won't see it. I'm going back to the money.

AI ON AI is actually wild. This is exactly what me and so many have mentioned in the feedback on this forum = stop AI use

It's not even funny anymore, as this dude is probably legit scamming people on his Telegram.

CRAZY work.

On a side note, hoping nobody is ending up in the dispute section because of this moron.
 
Hi BHW,

As the title says, I have managed over $1M in ad spend across various verticals on Meta (Facebook & Instagram), maintaining healthy profit margins.

I know that scaling isn't just about increasing the budget by 20% every day. It’s about structure, creative fatigue management, and robust data tracking.

More now than ever thanks to Andromeda newest update. Is a must have a good server side tracking (CAPI). I currently have my EMQ at 9.3/10 - This is crucial nowadays for getting better ROI.

Whether you are stuck at $100/day or trying to push past $5k/day, the game changes entirely.

I’m opening this thread to help the community and discuss:

  • Scaling Strategies: CBO vs ABO in 2025, horizontal vs vertical scaling.
  • Creative Strategy: How to find winning angles and structure your creative testing.
  • Tracking & Attribution: Dealing with signal loss, Server-Side tracking (CAPI), and understanding your true CPA.
  • Account Health: Keeping your assets compliant while pushing volume.
I've seen the platform change drastically over the last few years, and I'm happy to share what is working right now.

Ask me anything. Let's get those campaigns profitable.
Recently, I asked you about the 1-1-1 using $6.50/day, and you mentioned allocating 85% of the budget to the sales campaign and 15% to remarketing, using the 3 best countries and the 3 best creatives.
Okay, but how do I scale that?

Do I create more CBO campaigns with different creatives for that audience?
That’s my main question: how do I scale in CBO?
How do I increase the number of campaigns to scale more aggressively?
Would I just target the same audience with the same campaign structure but using new creatives?
 
LOL GOOD GAME

Yes, I even told you I was replying to AI with AI, never thought this would happen, but it's kinda awesome





AI ON AI is actually wild. This is exactly what me and so many have mentioned in the feedback on this forum = stop AI use

It's not even funny anymore, as this dude is probably legit scamming people on his Telegram.

CRAZY work.

On a side note, hoping nobody is ending up in the dispute section because of this moron.
Go ahead. Open ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude right now. Ask them to generate the specific ROASIA Framework, the exact Surfing Scaling percentages, or the Envelop Phase time-windows I detailed above. They won't find it. Why? Because LLMs are trained on past data, and what I shared comes from MY OWN current field experience.

You want to know why it took me nearly 2 hours to write that guide? Because English is not my first language. I write my strategies in Spanish (my native language) to ensure the technical nuance is perfect, and then I translate and polish them to ensure clarity for this forum. If a Moderator could see the draft logs, they would see the effort involved. That is not "low-effort AI spam"; that is respecting the community enough to deliver a clear message despite the language barrier.

"Show me the numbers": You want proof? You want to see what a real Launch strategy looks like with my ROASIA framework applied?

Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 3.47.59 PM.png

Let’s break down what you are looking at, since you like data:

Timeframe: Last 14 Days (Nov 17 - Nov 30, 2025).

Spend: $7,603,226 MXN (Mexican Pesos).

USD Equivalent: That is roughly $375,000 USD spent in just 2 weeks.

ROAS: 3.12 on cold traffic + retargeting.

The Result: Do the math on the profit.

Since I know your type, I challenge you: Download the image. Run it through an ELA (Error Level Analysis) tool. Check the metadata. Look for pixel inconsistencies. It is raw, unedited, and straight from the backend.

You are calling me a scammer, yet:

I haven't pitched a single thing.

I just dropped a 2,000-word scaling guide for free.

I just showed you a quarter-million-dollar ad spend proof.

You are fighting ghosts, my friend.

I won't be replying to you anymore. You can have the last word if it makes your ego feel better. I’m here to answer questions for the community and the learners.

Good luck with the cloaking.
 
Go ahead. Open ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude right now. Ask them to generate the specific ROASIA Framework, the exact Surfing Scaling percentages, or the Envelop Phase time-windows I detailed above. They won't find it. Why? Because LLMs are trained on past data, and what I shared comes from MY OWN current field experience.

You want to know why it took me nearly 2 hours to write that guide? Because English is not my first language. I write my strategies in Spanish (my native language) to ensure the technical nuance is perfect, and then I translate and polish them to ensure clarity for this forum. If a Moderator could see the draft logs, they would see the effort involved. That is not "low-effort AI spam"; that is respecting the community enough to deliver a clear message despite the language barrier.

"Show me the numbers": You want proof? You want to see what a real Launch strategy looks like with my ROASIA framework applied?

View attachment 491080

Let’s break down what you are looking at, since you like data:

Timeframe: Last 14 Days (Nov 17 - Nov 30, 2025).

Spend: $7,603,226 MXN (Mexican Pesos).

USD Equivalent: That is roughly $375,000 USD spent in just 2 weeks.

ROAS: 3.12 on cold traffic + retargeting.

The Result: Do the math on the profit.

Since I know your type, I challenge you: Download the image. Run it through an ELA (Error Level Analysis) tool. Check the metadata. Look for pixel inconsistencies. It is raw, unedited, and straight from the backend.

You are calling me a scammer, yet:

I haven't pitched a single thing.

I just dropped a 2,000-word scaling guide for free.

I just showed you a quarter-million-dollar ad spend proof.

You are fighting ghosts, my friend.

I won't be replying to you anymore. You can have the last word if it makes your ego feel better. I’m here to answer questions for the community and the learners.

Good luck with the cloaking.
Guys, stop fighting please :v
 
@Waddup @MynameisD Could you please keep things civil? Thanks.
Understood. Sorry about the derail, didn't mean to clutter the thread with drama. My only goal here is to share some knowledge with the community, so I'll stick to that moving forward.

Let's get back on track—feel free to drop any more questions guys, happy to help.
 
Recently, I asked you about the 1-1-1 using $6.50/day, and you mentioned allocating 85% of the budget to the sales campaign and 15% to remarketing, using the 3 best countries and the 3 best creatives.
Okay, but how do I scale that?

Do I create more CBO campaigns with different creatives for that audience?
That’s my main question: how do I scale in CBO?
How do I increase the number of campaigns to scale more aggressively?
Would I just target the same audience with the same campaign structure but using new creatives?
Does anyone have that answer?
 
Recently, I asked you about the 1-1-1 using $6.50/day, and you mentioned allocating 85% of the budget to the sales campaign and 15% to remarketing, using the 3 best countries and the 3 best creatives.
Okay, but how do I scale that?

Do I create more CBO campaigns with different creatives for that audience?
That’s my main question: how do I scale in CBO?
How do I increase the number of campaigns to scale more aggressively?
Would I just target the same audience with the same campaign structure but using new creatives?
Hey. Exactly, you nailed it.

To scale horizontally, you basically just launch a new CBO targeting the same audience (or Broad) but using completely new creatives.

Don't worry about them competing against each other. Since "Creative is the Targeting" now, Campaign A with a "Logical/Educational" creative will find a different pocket of users than Campaign B with an "Emotional/Lifestyle" creative. They are fishing in different parts of the same ocean.

So your scaling roadmap looks like this:

First, try Vertical Scaling on your winner. Bump the budget by 20-25% once a day if the CPA holds.

Second, execute Horizontal Scaling by launching those new CBOs with fresh angles (like you mentioned).

And if you want to be really aggressive and have the time to watch the screen, go with the Surfing Scaling method I explained in detail earlier in the thread. That’s my personal favorite for pushing volume fast.

Let me know if you need more clarity on the setup. Happy to help.
 
How can I recover my ad account if I suspect it has been flagged by Meta? I’m currently receiving high-CPM traffic with extremely low CTR and no conversions. I’ve tried creating new ad accounts, but the results remain the same. I’m not sure whether I need to replace the Pixel. Performance also dropped after about two months of switching to CAPI—during the first two months, results were still normal.
 
Any tips on Video Ads length? I am trying to sell a trip package to travelers. Your suggestions are deeply appreciated :)
 
How can I recover my ad account if I suspect it has been flagged by Meta? I’m currently receiving high-CPM traffic with extremely low CTR and no conversions. I’ve tried creating new ad accounts, but the results remain the same. I’m not sure whether I need to replace the Pixel. Performance also dropped after about two months of switching to CAPI—during the first two months, results were still normal.
Hey,

There are a lot of variables that need to be analyzed here. But most of the cases is about creatives and the strategy you are following.
Any tips on Video Ads length? I am trying to sell a trip package to travelers. Your suggestions are deeply appreciated :)
Hey,

Video Ads length is the less important thing to be brutally honest with you. What matters the most is the strategy and creatives. Not exactly the length. But again, the strategy behind it. And having AT LEAST 10 creatives per campaign, in order to feed Andromeda's Algo.

Hope this helps.
 
Back
Top