Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I bought this, but when i activated the license it just dissapeared and asked me again for the activation data, i check the info and the data was right
 
I've sent two messages to support regarding my problem with my scrapebox closing when harvesting, but none was answered how can i get in touch with scrapebox support?
 
I've sent two messages to support regarding my problem with my scrapebox closing when harvesting, but none was answered how can i get in touch with scrapebox support?

To contact support just use the Contact Form http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us

If you had problems twice, then perhaps try using a different email or checking your spam folder. Between license activations, transfers and tech support we send a couple hundred emails per day and every day get bounced mail due to spam filtering, mailbox over quota, typos when people enter their email in the form etc.
 
If the APIs were banned then they wouldn't have been able to succeed in the first place, which is why I suspect that the problem may be IP related with someone else hammering away with a couple of my shared IPs every 10 or so seconds with their own API keys through scrapebox or some other tool they're using.

This in turn leads me to suggest a feature request where the PA tool after it's done an entire list, goes and redoes the URLs which were 401 or 503 or had some other issue because it's extremely inconvenient and time consuming to fix something like this by hand just to see your work undone a few minutes later because someone else with one of your IPs hops on and starts hammering away. Right now if I click start again on a list of say around 300 urls where 240 or so were done and 60 were 401, it goes and redoes all the properly retrieved URL metrics unnecessarily along with the 401s and I have to export the output and pick out the 401s(they show as PA -1) and paste that into sb and rerun and repeat until no more 401s are produced.
I think I misunderstood you then.

If its consistently the same apis then it could be an api or an ip, you would have to test.

If those apis work sometimes and not others then it could indeed be your apis.

If you count the blocks in order like I was saying and you run the same list say 3 times in a row, if the exact same group of 10 or groups of urls in multiple of 10s always fail, thats linked to a specific api, which in turn is linked to the associatled IP. So it could be the ip or the api. You could try changing the ip and if it works then it was the ip of course. If not it could be the api. If that makes sense.
 
I think I misunderstood you then.

If its consistently the same apis then it could be an api or an ip, you would have to test.

If those apis work sometimes and not others then it could indeed be your apis.

If you count the blocks in order like I was saying and you run the same list say 3 times in a row, if the exact same group of 10 or groups of urls in multiple of 10s always fail, thats linked to a specific api, which in turn is linked to the associatled IP. So it could be the ip or the api. You could try changing the ip and if it works then it was the ip of course. If not it could be the api. If that makes sense.

No it doesn't make sense. Unless it's possible for a bad API key to sometimes work and sometimes not work. I would think that if the API key is expired for the month or banned or something then it would just not work and give an authentication error consistently rather than work intermittently. Assuming of course that nobody else besides me is using that API key which should not be the case since I didn't share them with anyone.

I switched to using just one API key and that works much better for my lists of 200 to 300 URLs that I need to check periodically. I think next I'll try and just use one API key without any proxies. It would be nice if the addon had the ability to redo URLs from the same batch though, without having to start fresh on the same URL list obviously...
 
To contact support just use the Contact Form http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us

If you had problems twice, then perhaps try using a different email or checking your spam folder. Between license activations, transfers and tech support we send a couple hundred emails per day and every day get bounced mail due to spam filtering, mailbox over quota, typos when people enter their email in the form etc.

that's were i sent my messages but none was answered
 
that's were i sent my messages but none was answered
They always answer me. I have seen their mail go to the spam folder before, so it looked they never replied.

At any rate I pm'd you.
 
Hello there,

I've been sent a ticket from the contact support form at http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us but I have never heard back a replied from them (none were kicked to spam folder, already checked it). It's been 2 days right now. My problem is I'm getting a problem with scrapebox harvesting. I think there's a bug with harvester because when I tried using private proxies, scrapebox won't harvested any single link at a certain time. When I tried to close the app once again it getting freeze as I see the harvesting season still have an active thread. I need to force close at task manager everytime to close the app. There's no problem with harvester when I'm not using proxies and server proxies. I hope this will be fixed asap. Thanks in advance.
 
Hello there,

I've been sent a ticket from the contact support form at http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us but I have never heard back a replied from them (none were kicked to spam folder, already checked it). It's been 2 days right now. My problem is I'm getting a problem with scrapebox harvesting. I think there's a bug with harvester because when I tried using private proxies, scrapebox won't harvested any single link at a certain time. When I tried to close the app once again it getting freeze as I see the harvesting season still have an active thread. I need to force close at task manager everytime to close the app. There's no problem with harvester when I'm not using proxies and server proxies. I hope this will be fixed asap. Thanks in advance.
Support is replying my mails, not sure what happend there. I pmed you though.
 
I have a feature request. Kindly add the Dupremove addon on scrapebox automator addon list. I know the automator has a similar function for harvester . But when the link list is huge, the harvester cannot load the lists. For me, I need to load a lists of 8GB and then split it.
 
The latest version is bugged. When you scrape it will get a bunch of errors, skip to around 10% done, then crash.

It's 100% not a proxy problem, because when you revert to 2.0.0.73 it works fine.

Not really interested at this point going through support and giving detailed info, as there are obviously enough people in this thread having the same problem and doing that.

Either way you guys should take a look and fix it, since the harvester is pretty much the main point of Scrapebox
 
Will two dozens of quality blog backlinks in a short time span, can 'kill' a particular thread of a forum?
Eg, a thread 'sank' permanently due to powerful links.
I sell controversial stuff (several clients had complainted on my selling thread after they used them), I often warry someone will perform this and such senerio will become true.
 
I have a feature request. Kindly add the Dupremove addon on scrapebox automator addon list. I know the automator has a similar function for harvester . But when the link list is huge, the harvester cannot load the lists. For me, I need to load a lists of 8GB and then split it.

the harvester handles 8Gb lists fine for me. Does it crash saying out of memory or ? The harvester grid in Scrapebox should support up to something like 134 million lines I think.

The latest version is bugged. When you scrape it will get a bunch of errors, skip to around 10% done, then crash.

It's 100% not a proxy problem, because when you revert to 2.0.0.73 it works fine.

Not really interested at this point going through support and giving detailed info, as there are obviously enough people in this thread having the same problem and doing that.

Either way you guys should take a look and fix it, since the harvester is pretty much the main point of Scrapebox

They are already working on it. Basically they rebuilt a lot of the thread code in .72 to make proxies work exponentially better and avoid bans better then ever.

Well a few users have an issue with it, so they built .74 to try and fix it, but the harvester is extremely complex. So sometimes when you change 1 thing it cascades into something else. So the .74 was an attempt to fix the issues that a few users were having with .72 and .73. It even says in the change log that it "might" be fixed. This is all standard, taking a few versions to sort out any bugs for major changes.

I tested the new version and it was fine for me and them and they released it and it works for like 99% of people.

Anyway, you can tell they are working on it because the download link for Scrapebox
http://www.scrapebox.com/payment-received

Will always have the latest version, but right now it still have .71 even though .74 is the latest update. That way if someone is having an issue they can go download .71.

Also in help >> restore previous version - you can roll back, which is sounds like what you did. So if .73 is working go with it, else download .71 at the above link and when .75 comes out, try that.

The improvements include the ability to change how often a proxy is rotated. So you can set it to rotate on every request or every 25th request or anything in between. This is huge, because as you use various engines or build in your own you can find the sweet spot and set it and it can dramatically affect ip blocks. AFter all avoiding those and still harvesting as fast as possible is the goal.

I've replied your pm..Kindly check. Thanks

thanks mate, pmed you back.
 
how can scrapebox do the Following.

trim root to url
trim url to root
put http to root domain
put htttp://www to root domain
put htttp:// to root domain


btw delete dedupe is not working or trim to root is not working in scrapebox.

tested it with www.domain.com it wont trim to root to domain.com
 
how can scrapebox do the Following.

trim root to url
trim url to root
put http to root domain
put htttp://www to root domain
put htttp:// to root domain


btw delete dedupe is not working or trim to root is not working in scrapebox.

tested it with www.domain.com it wont trim to root to domain.com

The trim function is fine, it trims a long url to the root url bei removing any path/parameter etc.
So http://www.domain.com/dir/page would end up in http://www.domain.com
It is not supposed to trim a url to domain (where does it say so?)
 
how can scrapebox do the Following.

trim root to url
trim url to root
put http to root domain
put htttp://www to root domain
put htttp:// to root domain


btw delete dedupe is not working or trim to root is not working in scrapebox.

tested it with www.domain.com it wont trim to root to domain.com

What? Im lost

You say trim root to url - what is this?

Trim url to root means http://www.domain.com/page1.htm becomes http://www.domain.com

Trimming to root does not remove the www because according to google and conventional standards domain.com and www.domain.com can be 2 completely different websites. Any proper webserver should redirect 1 to the other but they can be differnet. So trim to root just removes any thing beyond whatever is before the forward slash that comes after the TLD (aka .com, .net etc...)


what does put http to root domain mean. prefix it with this? Tools >> text editor >> hammer tool dropdown >> prefix with user input, input the http

Given what I just said, what do you mean by

put htttp://www to root domain
put htttp:// to root domain

You could just do those with user input on the prefix above, unless you mean something completely different and I don't follow. If you can give some concrete examples that would help.


Also if you want the www.domain.com to become domain.com

Just open your list in the scrapebox text editor or notepad and do a

find

www.

replace with

and leave the replace with box empty.

I use find replace a lot for basic stuff like this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top