AdvenueAlex
Registered Member
- Feb 21, 2015
- 86
- 12
I still support the view that Pacquiao must win
Vrill, you're regurgitating carbon copy doctrine of what you get from RT, the green Fox.
Content removed, and should I say its getting pretty heated in here.
Still i didnt saw a single proof that i'm wrong.Just poor assumptions.Where are the facts showing that i'm wrong ?
Is this the kind of argumentation which you are getting teached in today's school ?
I gave you guys so many possibilities showing that what i wrote is wrong.
LOL did you read yourself your poor claims ?I'm still waiting for a single proof.
But i guess thats exectly how todays argumentation works.If somebody has no argumentation since there are no facts proofing the opposite there will be tons of claims throughn at somebody instead of posting a single proof of a direct legit source
How would you describe a person who throughs claims at you without a single poof ?
I know what you mean. It's almost as bad as people who throw around claims and cite sources from quacks and disgraced scientists, but ignore every shred of evidence from the rest of the scientific community.
Which is exactly what you do with vaccines, for example.
You never read the studies else you wouldn't claim that.
@OutOfTown I think you misunderstood my point mate.
@Vrill, you're regurgitating carbon copy doctrine of what you get from RT, the green Fox.
It always gets heated when Vrill gets on his soap box.
He doesn't have the ability to engage in a discussion like an adult and can't refrain from calling everyone who disagrees with him an idiot.
It's ironic - because he has such a desire to discuss these things, but often ends up getting the thread closed because of his inability to keep his anger in check.
Anyway this was real boxing.